Category talk:Chemistry Workgroup (Top): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Mark Rust No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Sounds great, please do help drive this process forward. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:37, 23 December 2006 (CST) | Sounds great, please do help drive this process forward. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 12:37, 23 December 2006 (CST) | ||
Sorry for putting it in the wrong place, I thought that the category talk was for discussing articles which the other editors might want to approve or disapprove of.[[User:Mark Rust|Mark Rust]] | |||
Revision as of 13:51, 23 December 2006
Nuclear chemistry might be improved with time, but I think that we now have a reasonable introduction to the topic. I think that a journalist or a undergraduate student would be able to get a reasonable overview of some of the history and scope of the subject by reading the page. The page has now gone live and I think it might be worthy of approval. Mark Rust
Hi Mark, the place to say this is Talk:Nuclear chemistry.
Sounds great, please do help drive this process forward. --Larry Sanger 12:37, 23 December 2006 (CST)
Sorry for putting it in the wrong place, I thought that the category talk was for discussing articles which the other editors might want to approve or disapprove of.Mark Rust