Talk:Linux (operating system): Difference between revisions
imported>Robert Tito mNo edit summary |
imported>Raymond Pasco (linux vs linux distribution) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I wonder if that is not obtained when starting with MIMIX as the start for Linus Torvald's endeavour to create a multipurpose unix version. Put that into historic context to the ''free software'' becoming more popular, resulting in (now) consultancy companies prividing ''free open source linux'' such as Red Hat and the likes. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 11:12, 22 February 2007 (CST) | I wonder if that is not obtained when starting with MIMIX as the start for Linus Torvald's endeavour to create a multipurpose unix version. Put that into historic context to the ''free software'' becoming more popular, resulting in (now) consultancy companies prividing ''free open source linux'' such as Red Hat and the likes. [[User:Robert Tito|Robert Tito]] | [[User talk:Robert Tito|Talk]] 11:12, 22 February 2007 (CST) | ||
I think "Linux" should be about Linux (the thing on kernel.org) and "Linux distribution" should discuss the operating system family &c. I really don't mean to say this in the context of any GNU/Linux name debate (note that I didn't suggest an article named "GNU/Linux distribution"), but the coincidental placement of this comment might make it seem that way. Rather, I think that this is more precise terminology, and that both articles would be able to contain very different sets of information, as a kernel and a family of operating systems are rather different things, even if this family of operating systems is defined by being based around said kernel. --[[User:Raymond Pasco|Raymond Pasco]] 20:59, 28 March 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 14:59, 28 March 2007
Is anyone else amused about how cautious the first paragraph is? It's like two points of view are both trying to express their arguments in one sentence. I'd almost say we should just have a minor heading about Linux vs GNU/Linux. --Nick Johnson 11:06, 22 February 2007 (CST)
I wonder if that is not obtained when starting with MIMIX as the start for Linus Torvald's endeavour to create a multipurpose unix version. Put that into historic context to the free software becoming more popular, resulting in (now) consultancy companies prividing free open source linux such as Red Hat and the likes. Robert Tito | Talk 11:12, 22 February 2007 (CST)
I think "Linux" should be about Linux (the thing on kernel.org) and "Linux distribution" should discuss the operating system family &c. I really don't mean to say this in the context of any GNU/Linux name debate (note that I didn't suggest an article named "GNU/Linux distribution"), but the coincidental placement of this comment might make it seem that way. Rather, I think that this is more precise terminology, and that both articles would be able to contain very different sets of information, as a kernel and a family of operating systems are rather different things, even if this family of operating systems is defined by being based around said kernel. --Raymond Pasco 20:59, 28 March 2007 (CDT)