Talk:Tetanus: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter J. King (comments) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
Off the top of my head, I think that there are certain aspects of tetanus that are important to include: history of the disease, some epidemiologic data (past and present), information about the bacteria and a clear explanation of what a toxin is, and how that is pertinent in tetanus. Also, details about immunization. And, as already done, neonatal tetanus. I'm glad to be a collaborator here, and open to further input about a subject with which I have never before studied in great detail. Meanwhile, I'll do a literature search and see what I can come up with-[[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 16:00, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | Off the top of my head, I think that there are certain aspects of tetanus that are important to include: history of the disease, some epidemiologic data (past and present), information about the bacteria and a clear explanation of what a toxin is, and how that is pertinent in tetanus. Also, details about immunization. And, as already done, neonatal tetanus. I'm glad to be a collaborator here, and open to further input about a subject with which I have never before studied in great detail. Meanwhile, I'll do a literature search and see what I can come up with-[[User:Nancy Sculerati|Nancy Sculerati]] 16:00, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Yes to all that (though should [[toxin]] not be dealt with in a separate article, so as to avoid too much duplication?). I've confessed elsewhere my guilty secret as to why I started this article, but I'll be happy to do more on it. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 16:51, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | :Yes to all that (though should [[toxin]] not be dealt with in a separate article, so as to avoid too much duplication?). I've confessed elsewhere my guilty secret as to why I started this article, but I'll be happy to do more on it. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 16:51, 3 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
::Googling brings up loads of U.K. sites, and eventually some U.S. ones, but I couldn't find the equivalent information on immunisation programmes for any other country. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black"> [[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]] </span> 16:21, 4 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:15, 15 November 2007
Off the top of my head, I think that there are certain aspects of tetanus that are important to include: history of the disease, some epidemiologic data (past and present), information about the bacteria and a clear explanation of what a toxin is, and how that is pertinent in tetanus. Also, details about immunization. And, as already done, neonatal tetanus. I'm glad to be a collaborator here, and open to further input about a subject with which I have never before studied in great detail. Meanwhile, I'll do a literature search and see what I can come up with-Nancy Sculerati 16:00, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
- Yes to all that (though should toxin not be dealt with in a separate article, so as to avoid too much duplication?). I've confessed elsewhere my guilty secret as to why I started this article, but I'll be happy to do more on it. --Peter J. King Talk 16:51, 3 April 2007 (CDT)
- Googling brings up loads of U.K. sites, and eventually some U.S. ones, but I couldn't find the equivalent information on immunisation programmes for any other country. --Peter J. King Talk 16:21, 4 April 2007 (CDT)