Talk:New Deal: Difference between revisions
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
imported>Shamira Gelbman |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
== Rewrite needed == | |||
Can someone please turn this into a readable article that includes some well-informed information about the economic issues involved and moves a great deal of its secondary matter to other pages. I realise that this is mainly a transfer from Wikipedia, but in my opinion it falls far short of the standard we should require for a Citizendium article. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 17:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
I am now doing some pruning of irrelevant and inaccurate material in order to make room for the addition of the material that the article lacks. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 16:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
I have now done most of the "houskeeping work" of removing the irrelevant and the obviously inaccurate, and re-ordering the remainder. There is still scope for a lot of pruning (to mix metaphors!) but I hope that I have done enough to encourage contributions from people who understand the issues. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 15:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Despite the lack of response to the above, I have continued with the housework in the hope that by clearing away the opinionated assertions of the previous draft, I will have made room for evidence-backed contributions from more thoughtful American historians. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 22:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
:: It is a lot easier to navigate through now! [[User:Shamira Gelbman|Shamira Gelbman]] 17:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 11:13, 18 February 2009
Rewrite needed
Can someone please turn this into a readable article that includes some well-informed information about the economic issues involved and moves a great deal of its secondary matter to other pages. I realise that this is mainly a transfer from Wikipedia, but in my opinion it falls far short of the standard we should require for a Citizendium article. Nick Gardner 17:09, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
I am now doing some pruning of irrelevant and inaccurate material in order to make room for the addition of the material that the article lacks. Nick Gardner 16:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
I have now done most of the "houskeeping work" of removing the irrelevant and the obviously inaccurate, and re-ordering the remainder. There is still scope for a lot of pruning (to mix metaphors!) but I hope that I have done enough to encourage contributions from people who understand the issues. Nick Gardner 15:14, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Despite the lack of response to the above, I have continued with the housework in the hope that by clearing away the opinionated assertions of the previous draft, I will have made room for evidence-backed contributions from more thoughtful American historians. Nick Gardner 22:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- It is a lot easier to navigate through now! Shamira Gelbman 17:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
- Article with Definition
- Economics Category Check
- History Category Check
- Politics Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Economics Developing Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- History Developing Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- Politics Developing Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- History tag