Talk:Amateur radio/Catalogs/USA: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day (sub-sub-subpage might be too deep?) |
imported>Paul Derry |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The advantage here is that it conforms to the current [[CZ:Subpage Pilot|subpage standards]] (that might change) Possibly we need a ''regulations'' subpage? Also, sub-subpages are OK, that is what is being done for Signed Articles (see [[Biology/Signed_Articles/Fundamental_Questions_in_Biology_—_A_2006_PLoS_Editorial_by_Simon_A._Levin|example here]])but a sub-sub-subpage might be a bit too deep. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 12:21, 2 August 2007 (CDT) | The advantage here is that it conforms to the current [[CZ:Subpage Pilot|subpage standards]] (that might change) Possibly we need a ''regulations'' subpage? Also, sub-subpages are OK, that is what is being done for Signed Articles (see [[Biology/Signed_Articles/Fundamental_Questions_in_Biology_—_A_2006_PLoS_Editorial_by_Simon_A._Levin|example here]])but a sub-sub-subpage might be a bit too deep. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 12:21, 2 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
Ok, sounds good to me :) I wondered about how that might affect the subpage stuff. --[[User:Paul Derry|Paul Derry]] 15:34, 2 August 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 14:34, 2 August 2007
sub-sub-subpage
How about using a link like Amateur radio/Tables/USA?
The advantage here is that it conforms to the current subpage standards (that might change) Possibly we need a regulations subpage? Also, sub-subpages are OK, that is what is being done for Signed Articles (see example here)but a sub-sub-subpage might be a bit too deep. Chris Day (talk) 12:21, 2 August 2007 (CDT)
Ok, sounds good to me :) I wondered about how that might affect the subpage stuff. --Paul Derry 15:34, 2 August 2007 (CDT)