Talk:Solid harmonics: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Paul Wormer
No edit summary
imported>Jitse Niesen
(hbar in orbital angular momentum)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{checklist
|                abc = Solid harmonics
|                abc = Solid harmonics
|                cat1 = physics
|                cat1 = Physics
|                cat2 = mathematics
|                cat2 = Mathematics
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check =  
|          cat_check = No
|              status = 2
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = yes
|        underlinked = yes
Line 13: Line 13:
This article (my own article from Wikipedia) gave LaTeX errors which I worked around.
This article (my own article from Wikipedia) gave LaTeX errors which I worked around.
Added to WP version section on relation to regular and irregular solid harmonics and references.  --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 04:18, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
Added to WP version section on relation to regular and irregular solid harmonics and references.  --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 04:18, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
:Hi Paul. Is the definition of the orbital angular momentum <math>\mathbf{L}</math> (second displayed equation) correct? The factor <math>\hbar</math> seems out of place. -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 08:01, 24 August 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 08:01, 24 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Solid harmonics"
Workgroup category or categories Physics Workgroup, Mathematics Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by --Paul Wormer 04:18, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.





This article (my own article from Wikipedia) gave LaTeX errors which I worked around. Added to WP version section on relation to regular and irregular solid harmonics and references. --Paul Wormer 04:18, 22 August 2007 (CDT)

Hi Paul. Is the definition of the orbital angular momentum (second displayed equation) correct? The factor seems out of place. -- Jitse Niesen 08:01, 24 August 2007 (CDT)