Whiskey Rebellion: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Todd Coles
No edit summary
imported>Todd Coles
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
After the ratification of the [[U.S. Constitution]] in 1789, the federal government assumed the debts that the states incurred during the [[American Revolution]].  In an effort to reduce the national debt, [[Alexander Hamilton]], the [[United States Secretary of the Treasury|Secretary of the Treasury]], proposed a bill to tax distilled spirits.  The bill was passed into law in 1791.  The tax was not well received by farmers and distillers in the western frontier counties, primarily in [[Pennsylvania]].  Due to the difficulty of shipping grain to market, the western farmers became economically dependent on fermenting and distilling their grains in order to preserve it's lifespan.  These frontier counties also operated largely on the barter system, which made it difficult for them to pay cash taxes.  Believing that the federal government was acting against their interests, the frontiersmen refused to pay the tax.       
After the ratification of the [[U.S. Constitution]] in 1789, the federal government assumed the debts that the states incurred during the [[American Revolution]].  In an effort to reduce the national debt, [[Alexander Hamilton]], the [[United States Secretary of the Treasury|Secretary of the Treasury]], proposed a bill to tax distilled spirits.  The bill was passed into law in 1791.  The tax was not well received by farmers and distillers in the western frontier counties, primarily in [[Pennsylvania]].  Due to the difficulty of shipping grain to market, the western farmers became economically dependent on fermenting and distilling their grains in order to preserve it's lifespan.  These frontier counties also operated largely on the barter system, which made it difficult for them to pay cash taxes.  Believing that the federal government was acting against their interests, the frontiersmen refused to pay the tax.       


The tax resulted in both violent and non-violent responses to it.  In September 1791, sixteen men in Washington County tarred and feathered a tax collector named Robert Johnson. That same month, the western Pennsylvania counties of Washington, Allegheny, Westmoreland, and Fayette organized a representative meeting in [[Pittsburgh]] where they attempted a more moderate denouncement of the lawCollectors feared for their safety and no taxes were collected in western Pennsylvania throughout 1792By late 1792, an excise officer named John Neville finally found a residence that would allow him to set up an officeHe was unable to settle in, however, when locals threatened to burn the landlord's house down.
The tax resulted in both violent and non-violent responses to it.  In September 1791, sixteen men in Washington County tarred and feathered a tax collector named Robert Johnson. Johnson was able to identify some of the men who assaulted him and warrants were issued for their arrests.  Realizing the danger of the situation, head excise officer John Neville, a veteran of the [[American Revolution]], used a proxy to serve the warrantsThe proxy was assaulted by a mob and the warrants were never served.  Meetings were held to fight the tax with non-violent means by representatives from Pennsylvania's western counties of Washington, Allegheny, Westmoreland, and FayetteThe petitioned Congress, charging that the excise was a selective tax unfairly targeting western Pennsylvanian distillers.  Politicians in the east feared this violent resistance to pay the law signified a move toward frontier independence, of which there had been several occurrences in the 1780's.
 
Politicians in the east feared this violent resistance to pay the law signified a move toward frontier independence, of which there had been several occurrences in the 1780's.
 
 


A group of western Pennsylvanians known as the Mingo Creek Association became the driving force behind the rebellion.  Their members rose through the ranks of the local authorized militias and used their power to obstruct tax collectors and protect residents from debt lawsuits.  In 1792, Neville rented a house from an army officer named William Faulkner in Washington County.  Faulkner was threatened by the Association, and during a convention in [[Pittsburgh]] issued a series of radical demands including support for actions against anyone aiding federal officials.  Shortly afterward, a group ransacked Faulkner's house and he decided to not allow Neville to use it as his base of operations.


==Bibliography==
==Bibliography==

Revision as of 15:33, 5 September 2007

The Whiskey Rebellion was a rural uprising in the western counties of Pennsylvania in 1794 in response to a United States federal government imposed excise tax placed on liquor. The rebellion had to be put down by force, as George Washington became the only U.S. President to command troops in the field. It demonstrated that the federal government was willing to enforce laws by force. The unpopularity of this tax contributed to the resignation of Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, who later formed the Republican Party which proved to be the downfall of the Federalist Party.

Background

After the ratification of the U.S. Constitution in 1789, the federal government assumed the debts that the states incurred during the American Revolution. In an effort to reduce the national debt, Alexander Hamilton, the Secretary of the Treasury, proposed a bill to tax distilled spirits. The bill was passed into law in 1791. The tax was not well received by farmers and distillers in the western frontier counties, primarily in Pennsylvania. Due to the difficulty of shipping grain to market, the western farmers became economically dependent on fermenting and distilling their grains in order to preserve it's lifespan. These frontier counties also operated largely on the barter system, which made it difficult for them to pay cash taxes. Believing that the federal government was acting against their interests, the frontiersmen refused to pay the tax.

The tax resulted in both violent and non-violent responses to it. In September 1791, sixteen men in Washington County tarred and feathered a tax collector named Robert Johnson. Johnson was able to identify some of the men who assaulted him and warrants were issued for their arrests. Realizing the danger of the situation, head excise officer John Neville, a veteran of the American Revolution, used a proxy to serve the warrants. The proxy was assaulted by a mob and the warrants were never served. Meetings were held to fight the tax with non-violent means by representatives from Pennsylvania's western counties of Washington, Allegheny, Westmoreland, and Fayette. The petitioned Congress, charging that the excise was a selective tax unfairly targeting western Pennsylvanian distillers. Politicians in the east feared this violent resistance to pay the law signified a move toward frontier independence, of which there had been several occurrences in the 1780's.

A group of western Pennsylvanians known as the Mingo Creek Association became the driving force behind the rebellion. Their members rose through the ranks of the local authorized militias and used their power to obstruct tax collectors and protect residents from debt lawsuits. In 1792, Neville rented a house from an army officer named William Faulkner in Washington County. Faulkner was threatened by the Association, and during a convention in Pittsburgh issued a series of radical demands including support for actions against anyone aiding federal officials. Shortly afterward, a group ransacked Faulkner's house and he decided to not allow Neville to use it as his base of operations.

Bibliography

  • Hogeland, William. The Whiskey Rebellion: George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and the frontier rebels who challenged America's newfound sovereignty. Scribner, 2006.
  • Slaughter, Thomas P. The Whiskey Rebellion: Frontier epilogue to the American Revolution. Oxford University Press, 1986.

External Links