Cervical cancer: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
No edit summary
imported>Robert Badgett
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
[[Image:Cervical cancer.jpg|right|thumb|266px|{{#ifexist:Template:Cervical cancer.jpg/credit|{{Cervical cancer.jpg/credit}}<br/>|}}]]
==Screening==
==Screening==
===Clinical practice guidelines===
[[Clinical practice guideline]]s by the [[U.S. Preventive Services Task Force]] guide screening:<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspscerv.htm |title=Screening for Cervical Cancer |author=[U.S. Preventive Services Task Force |work=uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org |year=2012 [last update] |accessdate=March 15, 2012}}</ref>
* "The USPSTF recommends screening for cervical cancer in women ages 21 to 65 years with cytology (Pap smear) every 3 years or, for women ages 30 to 65 years who want to lengthen the screening interval, screening with a combination of cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every 5 years. See the Clinical Considerations for discussion of cytology method, HPV testing, and screening interval."
* "The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix and who do not have a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion (i.e., cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] grade 2 or 3) or cervical cancer."
* "The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer with HPV testing, alone or in combination with cytology, in women younger than age 30 years."
The American Cancer Society recommends similar screening.<ref>{{Cite journal
| doi = 10.3322/caac.21139
| issn = 1542-4863
| last = Saslow
| first = Debbie
| coauthors = Diane Solomon, Herschel W Lawson, Maureen Killackey, Shalini L Kulasingam, Joanna Cain, Francisco A. R Garcia, Ann T Moriarty, Alan G Waxman, David C Wilbur, Nicolas Wentzensen, Levi S Downs Jr, Mark Spitzer, Anna‐Barbara Moscicki, Eduardo L Franco, Mark H Stoler, Mark Schiffman, Philip E Castle, Evan R Myers
| title = American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer
| journal = CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
| accessdate = 2012-03-15
| url = http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21139/abstract
}}</ref>
In additional, [[clinical practice guideline]]s address [[mass screening]] for cervical cancer by the [http://www.acog.org/ American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology].<ref>(2009) [http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/documents/PB109_Cervical_Cytology_Screening.pdf Cervical Cytology Screening]. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology</ref>. A summary of these guidelines is:<ref>Davis AJ. (2009) [http://womens-health.jwatch.org/cgi/content/full/2009/1123/1 Major Changes in ACOG Cervical Cytology Screening Recommendations]. Journal Watch Women's Health</ref>
* "Cervical cancer screening should begin at age 21 regardless of age at onset of sexual activity."
* "Cervical cytology screening from age 21 to 29 is recommended every 2 years but should be more frequent in women who are HIV-positive, are immunosuppressed, were exposed in utero to [[diethylstilbestrol]], or have been treated for [[cervical intraepithelial neoplasia]] (CIN) 2, 3 or cervical cancer."
* "Women age  30 who have three consecutive negative screens and who do not fit the above criteria for more-frequent screening may be tested every 3 years. Co-testing with cervical cytology and high-risk HPV typing is also appropriate; if both tests are negative, rescreening in 3 years is warranted."
* "Cervical cancer screening is unnecessary in women who have undergone hysterectomies for benign disease and who have no histories of CIN."
* "Discontinuation of screening after age 65 or 70 is reasonable in women with 3 negative consecutive tests and no cervical abnormalities during the previous decade."
* "Women with histories of CIN 2, 3 or cancer should undergo annual screening for 20 years after treatment."
* "[[Human papilloma virus (HPV)|HPV]] vaccination does not change these recommendations."


===Accuracy of screening tests===
===Accuracy of screening tests===
====Papanicolaou smear====
====Papanicolaou smear====
A [[systematic review]] of available studies found the follow results.<ref name="pmid18165406">{{cite journal |author=Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Klinkhamer P, Martin-Hirsch P, Siebers AG, Bulten J |title=Liquid Compared With Conventional Cervical Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |journal=Obstet Gynecol |volume=111 |issue=1 |pages=167–177 |year=2008 |pmid=18165406 |doi=10.1097/01.AOG.0000296488.85807.b3 |issn=}}</ref>
A [[systematic review]] of available studies for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse found the follow results.<ref name="pmid18165406">{{cite journal |author=Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Klinkhamer P, Martin-Hirsch P, Siebers AG, Bulten J |title=Liquid Compared With Conventional Cervical Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis |journal=Obstet Gynecol |volume=111 |issue=1 |pages=167–177 |year=2008 |pmid=18165406 |doi=10.1097/01.AOG.0000296488.85807.b3 |issn=}}</ref>
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+ Ability to detect ASCUS or worse.<ref name="pmid18165406"/>
|+ Ability to detect ASCUS or worse.<ref name="pmid18165406"/>
Line 16: Line 44:
|}
|}


A more recent study of the convention method reported very similar results:<ref name="pmid17942871">{{cite journal |author=Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, ''et al'' |title=Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=357 |issue=16 |pages=1579–88 |year=2007 |pmid=17942871 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa071430|url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/357/16/1579}}</ref>
A more recent study of the conventional method for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or 3 reported very similar results:<ref name="pmid17942871">{{cite journal |author=Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, ''et al'' |title=Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=357 |issue=16 |pages=1579–88 |year=2007 |pmid=17942871 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa071430|url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/357/16/1579}}</ref>
* [[sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] 55%
* [[sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] 55%
* [[specificity (tests)|specificity]] 94%
* [[specificity (tests)|specificity]] 94%
Line 28: Line 56:
* [[sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] 100%<ref name="pmid17942871"/>
* [[sensitivity (tests)|sensitivity]] 100%<ref name="pmid17942871"/>
* [[specificity (tests)|specificity]] 93%<ref name="pmid17942871"/>
* [[specificity (tests)|specificity]] 93%<ref name="pmid17942871"/>
===Specimen collection===
"The widely used Ayre's spatula is the least effective device for cervical sampling and should be superseded by extended-tip spatulas for primary screening and investigation of women before and after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia" according to a [[meta-analysis]]. <ref name="pmid10577637">{{cite journal| author=Martin-Hirsch P, Lilford R, Jarvis G, Kitchener HC| title=Efficacy of cervical-smear collection devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. | journal=Lancet | year= 1999 | volume= 354 | issue= 9192 | pages= 1763-70 | pmid=10577637 | doi= | pmc= | url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&tool=sumsearch.org/cite&retmode=ref&cmd=prlinks&id=10577637  }} </ref>


===Effectiveness of screening===
===Effectiveness of screening===
In a [[randomized controlled trial]], the addition of Human papillomavirus testing to screening for cervical cancer "reduces the incidence of grade 2 or 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer detected by subsequent screening examinations."<ref name="pmid17942871">{{cite journal |author=Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, ''et al'' |title=Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=357 |issue=16 |pages=1579–88 |year=2007 |pmid=17942871 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa071430|url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/357/16/1579}}</ref>
In a [[randomized controlled trial]], the addition of Human papillomavirus testing to screening for cervical cancer "reduces the incidence of grade 2 or 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer detected by subsequent screening examinations."<ref name="pmid17942872">{{cite journal |author=Naucler P, Ryd W, Törnberg S, ''et al'' |title=Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer |journal=N. Engl. J. Med. |volume=357 |issue=16 |pages=1589–97 |year=2007 |pmid=17942872 |doi=10.1056/NEJMoa073204 |url=http://content.nejm.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=short&pmid=17942872&promo=ONFLNS19}}</ref>


In another [[randomized controlled trial]], the addition of Human papillomavirus testing to screening for cervical cancer led to  earlier detection of CIN3+ lesions.<ref name="pmid17919718">{{cite journal |author=Bulkmans NW, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, ''et al'' |title=Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial |journal=Lancet |volume=370 |issue=9601 |pages=1764–72 |year=2007 |pmid=17919718 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61450-0}}</ref>
In another [[randomized controlled trial]], the addition of Human papillomavirus testing to screening for cervical cancer led to  earlier detection of CIN3+ lesions.<ref name="pmid17919718">{{cite journal |author=Bulkmans NW, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, ''et al'' |title=Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial |journal=Lancet |volume=370 |issue=9601 |pages=1764–72 |year=2007 |pmid=17919718 |doi=10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61450-0}}</ref>


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>

Revision as of 11:56, 24 July 2012

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
(PD) Photo: U.S. Centers for Disease Control

Screening

Clinical practice guidelines

Clinical practice guidelines by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guide screening:[1]

  • "The USPSTF recommends screening for cervical cancer in women ages 21 to 65 years with cytology (Pap smear) every 3 years or, for women ages 30 to 65 years who want to lengthen the screening interval, screening with a combination of cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every 5 years. See the Clinical Considerations for discussion of cytology method, HPV testing, and screening interval."
  • "The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix and who do not have a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion (i.e., cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] grade 2 or 3) or cervical cancer."
  • "The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer with HPV testing, alone or in combination with cytology, in women younger than age 30 years."

The American Cancer Society recommends similar screening.[2]


In additional, clinical practice guidelines address mass screening for cervical cancer by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology.[3]. A summary of these guidelines is:[4]

  • "Cervical cancer screening should begin at age 21 regardless of age at onset of sexual activity."
  • "Cervical cytology screening from age 21 to 29 is recommended every 2 years but should be more frequent in women who are HIV-positive, are immunosuppressed, were exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol, or have been treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2, 3 or cervical cancer."
  • "Women age 30 who have three consecutive negative screens and who do not fit the above criteria for more-frequent screening may be tested every 3 years. Co-testing with cervical cytology and high-risk HPV typing is also appropriate; if both tests are negative, rescreening in 3 years is warranted."
  • "Cervical cancer screening is unnecessary in women who have undergone hysterectomies for benign disease and who have no histories of CIN."
  • "Discontinuation of screening after age 65 or 70 is reasonable in women with 3 negative consecutive tests and no cervical abnormalities during the previous decade."
  • "Women with histories of CIN 2, 3 or cancer should undergo annual screening for 20 years after treatment."
  • "HPV vaccination does not change these recommendations."

Accuracy of screening tests

Papanicolaou smear

A systematic review of available studies for detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse found the follow results.[5]

Ability to detect ASCUS or worse.[5]
ASCUS or worse High grade or worse
sensitivity specificity sensitivity specificity
Conventional method 88% 71% 55% 97%
Liquid-based thin prep 88% 71% 57% 97%

A more recent study of the conventional method for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or 3 reported very similar results:[6]

Human papillomavirus testing

Combined testing

If either the Papanicolaou smear or Human papillomavirus testing are abnormal:

Specimen collection

"The widely used Ayre's spatula is the least effective device for cervical sampling and should be superseded by extended-tip spatulas for primary screening and investigation of women before and after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia" according to a meta-analysis. [7]

Effectiveness of screening

In a randomized controlled trial, the addition of Human papillomavirus testing to screening for cervical cancer "reduces the incidence of grade 2 or 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer detected by subsequent screening examinations."[8]

In another randomized controlled trial, the addition of Human papillomavirus testing to screening for cervical cancer led to earlier detection of CIN3+ lesions.[9]

References

  1. [U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2012 [last update]). Screening for Cervical Cancer. uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org. Retrieved on March 15, 2012.
  2. Saslow, Debbie; Diane Solomon, Herschel W Lawson, Maureen Killackey, Shalini L Kulasingam, Joanna Cain, Francisco A. R Garcia, Ann T Moriarty, Alan G Waxman, David C Wilbur, Nicolas Wentzensen, Levi S Downs Jr, Mark Spitzer, Anna‐Barbara Moscicki, Eduardo L Franco, Mark H Stoler, Mark Schiffman, Philip E Castle, Evan R Myers. "American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer". CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. DOI:10.3322/caac.21139. ISSN 1542-4863. Retrieved on 2012-03-15. Research Blogging.
  3. (2009) Cervical Cytology Screening. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecology
  4. Davis AJ. (2009) Major Changes in ACOG Cervical Cytology Screening Recommendations. Journal Watch Women's Health
  5. 5.0 5.1 Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Klinkhamer P, Martin-Hirsch P, Siebers AG, Bulten J (2008). "Liquid Compared With Conventional Cervical Cytology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". Obstet Gynecol 111 (1): 167–177. DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000296488.85807.b3. PMID 18165406. Research Blogging.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, et al (2007). "Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer". N. Engl. J. Med. 357 (16): 1579–88. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa071430. PMID 17942871. Research Blogging.
  7. Martin-Hirsch P, Lilford R, Jarvis G, Kitchener HC (1999). "Efficacy of cervical-smear collection devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis.". Lancet 354 (9192): 1763-70. PMID 10577637[e]
  8. Naucler P, Ryd W, Törnberg S, et al (2007). "Human papillomavirus and Papanicolaou tests to screen for cervical cancer". N. Engl. J. Med. 357 (16): 1589–97. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa073204. PMID 17942872. Research Blogging.
  9. Bulkmans NW, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, et al (2007). "Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial". Lancet 370 (9601): 1764–72. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61450-0. PMID 17919718. Research Blogging.