Category talk:Chess: Difference between revisions

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-I do not believe that we currently employ specific article-level categories in CZ. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:01, 7 January 2008 (CST)
-I don't think its a bad idea. After all he is 'being bold' :-) [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 09:35, 7 January 2008 (CST)
-:I'm frankly ambivalent, but if we're going to do it then there needs to be policy and guidelines set up. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:54, 7 January 2008 (CST)
-I don't think its completely necessary to 'mobilize the troops' and begin a categorisation rush, but it would be nice to have a few knocking about. I don't think it does any harm. [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 09:59, 7 January 2008 (CST)
-:Actually, I thought about it for a few minutes and I'm not really sure we should have article-level categories like this.  It defeats the purpose of using subpage clusters.  Really, he should be using the tab that's designed for this purpose instead of creating an all new category all together.  See [[Vitamin_C/Related_Articles]] for example. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 10:01, 7 January 2008 (CST)

Latest revision as of 02:47, 13 September 2019