Warfarin: Difference between revisions
imported>Robert Badgett |
imported>Robert Badgett |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
====Empiric dosing==== | ====Empiric dosing==== | ||
The evidence table suggests that the Harrison 5 mg algorithm from Ontario is the chest combination of efficacy and safety; however, two independent studies (Kovacs<ref name="pmid12729425"/> and Quiroz in 2006 from the Massachusetts General Hospital<ref name="pmid16893712"/>) have not been able to replicate the results. One explanation may be that the personnel in the Harrison study were more expert and the flexibility in the algorithm allowed expression of their expertise. If so, then perhaps equally expert health care providers should use the Harrison 5 mg algorithm while other personnel should use the Kovacs 10 mg algorithm. Considering that the expertise of the Massachusetts General Hospital could not replicate the results | The evidence table suggests that the Harrison 5 mg algorithm from Ontario is the chest combination of efficacy and safety; however, two independent studies (Kovacs<ref name="pmid12729425"/> and Quiroz in 2006 from the Massachusetts General Hospital<ref name="pmid16893712"/>) have not been able to replicate the results of Ontario group of Harrison and Crowther. One explanation may be that the personnel in the Harrison study were more expert and the flexibility in the algorithm allowed expression of their expertise. If so, then perhaps equally expert health care providers should use the Harrison 5 mg algorithm while other personnel should use the Kovacs 10 mg algorithm. Considering that the expertise of the Massachusetts General Hospital could not replicate the Ontario results, perhaps most providers should use the Kovacs 10 mg algorithm. | ||
A [[systematic review]] of the [[randomized controlled trial]]s done through 2003 of 5 mg versus the 10 mg concluded that the Kovacs 10 mg regimen is best.<ref name="pmid15522981">{{cite journal |author=Eckhoff CD, Didomenico RJ, Shapiro NL |title=Initiating warfarin therapy: 5 mg versus 10 mg |journal=Ann Pharmacother |volume=38 |issue=12 |pages=2115–21 |year=2004 |pmid=15522981 |doi=10.1345/aph.1E083}}</ref> This conclusion was largely based on the inability of the results of the Harrison 5 mg flexible algorithm to be replicated by Kovacs. | A [[systematic review]] of the [[randomized controlled trial]]s done through 2003 of 5 mg versus the 10 mg concluded that the Kovacs 10 mg regimen is best.<ref name="pmid15522981">{{cite journal |author=Eckhoff CD, Didomenico RJ, Shapiro NL |title=Initiating warfarin therapy: 5 mg versus 10 mg |journal=Ann Pharmacother |volume=38 |issue=12 |pages=2115–21 |year=2004 |pmid=15522981 |doi=10.1345/aph.1E083}}</ref> This conclusion was largely based on the inability of the results of the Harrison 5 mg flexible algorithm to be replicated by Kovacs. |
Revision as of 07:14, 25 January 2008
Warfarin (IUPAC name 4-hydroxy-3-(3-oxo-1-phenylbutyl)-2H-chromen-2-one), also widely called coumadin, is a an anticoagulant medication used prophylactically to suppress the formation of embolism and thromboembolism. It was originally designed to be a rat poison. It works as an anticogulant by suppressing the enzyme epoxide reductase in the liver, thereby suppresing the formation of the reduced form of vitamin K epoxide, which is needed for the synthesis of many coagulation factors. As a drug, it is often sold as the sodium salt of warfarin.
Brand names
- Athrombin
- Athrombin-K
- Athrombine-K
- Brumolin
- Co-Rax
- Coumadin
- Coumafen
- Coumafene
- Coumaphen
- Coumaphene
- Coumarins
- Coumefene
- D-Con
- Dethmor
- Dethnel
- Dicusat E
- Frass-Ratron
- Jantoven
- Kumader
- Kumadu
- Kumatox
- Kypfarin
- Latka 42
- Mar-Frin
- Marevan
- Maveran
- Panwarfin
- Place-Pax
- Prothromadin
- RAX
- Rosex
- Sofarin
- Solfarin
- Sorexa Plus
- Temus W
- Tintorane
- Tox-Hid
- Vampirinip II
- Vampirinip III
- Waran
- Warf 42
- Warfarat
- Warfarin Plus
- Warfarin Q
- Warfarine
- Warficide
- Warfilone
- Zoocoumarin
Mechanism of action
Warfarin therapy reduces the vitamin K dependent cofactors II, VII, IX, and X and the vitamin K dependent Protein C. The level of factor II is thought to most influence coagulation.[1][2] The levels of factor VII and Protein C fall the fastest after warfarin is started.[2] With the exception of Factor IX, these factors are from either the extrinsic pathway or the final common pathway.
The effect of warfarin is measured by the prothrombin time (or the International Normalized Ratio derived from the prothrombin time) although warfarin can also affect the partial thromboplastin time.[3][4]
Pharmacokinetics
Absorption
Distribution
Metabolism
Pharmacogenomics
Warfarin activity is determined partially by genetic factors. The American Food and Drug Administration "highlights the opportunity for healthcare providers to use genetic tests to improve their initial estimate of what is a reasonable warfarin dose for individual patients" .[5]
VKORC1
Genetic polymorphisms in the vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1 (VKORC1) gene explain 30% of the dose variation between patients[6]: particular mutations make VKORC1 less susceptible to suppression by warfarin[7] There are a main haplotypes that explain 25% of variation: low-dose haplotype group (A) and a high-dose haplotype group (B).[8] For the three combinations of the haplotypes, the mean daily maintenance dose of warfarin was:
- A/A: 2.7+/-0.2 mg
- A/B: 4.9+/-0.2 mg
- B/B: 6.2+/-0.3 mg
VKORC1 polymorphisms also explain why African Americans are relatively resistant to warfarin (higher proportion of group B haplotypes), while Asian Americans are more sensitive (higher proportion of group A haplotypes).[8]
CYP2C9
CYP2C9 is an isozyme of cytochrome P-450. Polymorphisms of CYP2C9 explain another 10% of variation in warfarin dosing[6], mainly among Caucasian patients as these variants are rare in African American and most Asian populations.[9] A meta-analysis of mainly Caucasian patients found[9]:
- CYP2C9*2 allele:
- present in 12.2% of patients
- mean reduction was in warfarin dose was 0.85 mg (17% reduction)
- relative bleeding risk was 1.91
- CYP2C9*3 allele:
- present in 7.9% of patients
- mean reduction was in warfarin dose was 1.92 mg (37% reduction)
- relative bleeding risk was 1.77
Excretion
Dosage
Loading regimens
Because of warfarin's difficult pharmacokinetics, researchers have proposed algorithms for warfarin loading.
Dosing | Study | Rate of anticoagulation (INR=2-3) |
Rate of over-coagulation | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kovacs 10 mg | 10 mg/day for two days then specified adjusted dosing |
Kovacs†[10] | 83% by day 5 | 9% within 4 weeks(INR>5) |
Quiroz‡[12] | 56% at 5 days | 0% within 5 days (INR>5) | ||
Harrison 10 mg | 10 mg/day for one day then flexible adjusted dosing |
Harrison[2] | 63% at 3.5 days | 17% within 3.5 days (INR>4.8) |
Crowther[11] | 69% at 5 days | 0% within 5 days (INR>5) | ||
Kovacs 5 mg | 5 mg/day for two days then specified adjusted dosing |
Kovacs†[10] | 46% by day 5 | 11% within 4 weeks (INR>5) |
Harrison 5 mg | 5 mg/day for one day then flexible adjusted dosing |
Harrison [2] | 80% at 3.5 days | 4% within 4.5 days (INR>4.8) |
Crowther[11] | 88% at 5 days | 3% within 5 days (INR>5) | ||
Quiroz‡[12] | 52% at 5 days | 0% within 5 days (INR>5) | ||
† Blinded study. ‡ Independent study. Notes: 1. INR. International Normalized Ratio 2. The Kovacs 5 mg algorithm is the same as the Harrison 5 mg algorithm except that where Harrison gave a range warfarin of dosages based on the INR, Kovacs specified a dose (usually at the high end of the range offered by Harrison.[1] |
Empiric dosing
The evidence table suggests that the Harrison 5 mg algorithm from Ontario is the chest combination of efficacy and safety; however, two independent studies (Kovacs[10] and Quiroz in 2006 from the Massachusetts General Hospital[12]) have not been able to replicate the results of Ontario group of Harrison and Crowther. One explanation may be that the personnel in the Harrison study were more expert and the flexibility in the algorithm allowed expression of their expertise. If so, then perhaps equally expert health care providers should use the Harrison 5 mg algorithm while other personnel should use the Kovacs 10 mg algorithm. Considering that the expertise of the Massachusetts General Hospital could not replicate the Ontario results, perhaps most providers should use the Kovacs 10 mg algorithm.
A systematic review of the randomized controlled trials done through 2003 of 5 mg versus the 10 mg concluded that the Kovacs 10 mg regimen is best.[1] This conclusion was largely based on the inability of the results of the Harrison 5 mg flexible algorithm to be replicated by Kovacs.
Clinical practice guidelines in 2004 by the American College of Chest Physicians concluded that either 5 or 10 loads are acceptable.[13] The guidelines also state "if treatment is not urgent (eg, chronic stable atrial fibrillation), warfarin administration, without concurrent heparin administration, can be commenced out-of-hospital with an anticipated maintenance dose of 4 to 5 mg per day."[13]
Since publication of the systematic review[1] and clinical practice guidelines[13], a nonblinded, randomized controlled trial by Quiroz[12] found no difference between algorithms, but also achieved less frequent anticoagulation. The reason is not clear as the Kovacs 10 mg algorithm is very specific on each dose of warfarin. The Quiroz trial is also unique in that all patients were receiving a fondaparinux bridge.
Additional algorithms:
- The Tait 5 mg regimen is for outpatient anticoagulation. Patients are given 5 mg of warfarin per day for 5 days and then the INR is checked on day 5 to determine further dosing. (summary)[14]
- The Fennerty 10 mg regimen is an older regimen that has not been studied in an randomized controlled trial.[15][16]
Pharmacogenetic guided dosing
- The Kovacs 10 mg algorithm performed similarly to a pharmacogenetic-guided algorithm.[17]
- Millican derived a pharmacogenetic-based model from a cohort of orthopedic patients. The model included CYP29C and VKORC1 genotype results and predicted 80% of the variation in warfarin doses. It is awaiting validation in larger populations and has not been reproduced in those who require warfarin for other indications.[18]
Adjusting the maintenance dose
Recommendations by the American College of Chest Physicians[13] have been distilled into a table to help manage dose adjustments.[19]
Discontinuation before procedures
One regimin before coronary artery bypass grafting is to stop 6 days before and give 5 mg/day of vitamin 5 and low molecular weight heparin.[20]
Interactions and contraindications
Some foodstuffs have also been reported to interact with warfarin.[21]
Adverse effects
Elderly patients
Patients aged 80 years or more may be especially susceptible to bleeding complications with a rate of 13 bleeds per 100 person-years.[22]
Patients with cancer
No cancer | Cancer | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stage I or II | Stage III | Stage IV | |||
Major bleeding |
Events per 100 patient-years |
8.6 | 3.4 | 19.1 | 42.8 |
Hazard ratio | 1 | 0.5 | 2.15 | 4.8 | |
Recurrent VTE |
Events per 100 patient-years |
12.8 | 14.5 | 44.1 | 54.1 |
Hazard ratio | 1 | 1.9 | 5.3 | 4.6 | |
Adapted from Table 3 of Prandoni et al.<[23] |
Patients with cancer are more likely to have bleeding complications, especially if they have Stage III (regionally extensive) or IV (metastatic) cancer.[23] Regardless of the extent of cancer, the risk of bleeding was less than the risk of recurrent embolism and thromboembolism:
Antagonism and reversal
A detailed table on reversing warfarin are provided in clinical practice guidelines from the American College of Chest Physicians.[13] For patients with an International Normalized Ratio (INR) between 4.5 and 10.0, 1 mg of oral vitamin K is effective.[24]
References
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 Eckhoff CD, Didomenico RJ, Shapiro NL (2004). "Initiating warfarin therapy: 5 mg versus 10 mg". Ann Pharmacother 38 (12): 2115–21. DOI:10.1345/aph.1E083. PMID 15522981. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 Harrison L, Johnston M, Massicotte MP, Crowther M, Moffat K, Hirsh J (1997). "Comparison of 5-mg and 10-mg loading doses in initiation of warfarin therapy". Ann. Intern. Med. 126 (2): 133–6. PMID 9005747. [e]
- ↑ Bell DF, Harris WH, Kuter DJ, Wessinger SJ (1988). "Elevated partial thromboplastin time as an indicator of hemorrhagic risk in postoperative patients on warfarin prophylaxis". J Arthroplasty 3 (2): 181–4. PMID 3397749. [e]
- ↑ Hauser VM, Rozek SL (1986). "Effect of warfarin on the activated partial thromboplastin time". Drug Intell Clin Pharm 20 (12): 964–7. PMID 3816546. [e]
- ↑ FDA Approves Updated Warfarin (Coumadin) Prescribing Information. Retrieved on 2007-08-20.
- ↑ 6.0 6.1 Wadelius M, Chen LY, Downes K, et al (2005). "Common VKORC1 and GGCX polymorphisms associated with warfarin dose". Pharmacogenomics J. 5 (4): 262-70. DOI:10.1038/sj.tpj.6500313. PMID 15883587. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Rost S, Fregin A, Ivaskevicius V, et al (2004). "Mutations in VKORC1 cause warfarin resistance and multiple coagulation factor deficiency type 2". Nature 427 (6974): 537–41. DOI:10.1038/nature02214. PMID 14765194. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 8.0 8.1 Rieder MJ, Reiner AP, Gage BF, et al (2005). "Effect of VKORC1 haplotypes on transcriptional regulation and warfarin dose". N. Engl. J. Med. 352 (22): 2285-93. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa044503. PMID 15930419. Research Blogging.
Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "pmid15930419" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ 9.0 9.1 Sanderson S, Emery J, Higgins J (2005). "CYP2C9 gene variants, drug dose, and bleeding risk in warfarin-treated patients: a HuGEnet systematic review and meta-analysis". Genet. Med. 7 (2): 97-104. PMID 15714076. [e]
- ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 10.3 Kovacs MJ, Rodger M, Anderson DR, et al (2003). "Comparison of 10-mg and 5-mg warfarin initiation nomograms together with low-molecular-weight heparin for outpatient treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial". Ann. Intern. Med. 138 (9): 714-9. PMID 12729425. [e]
- ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 Crowther MA, Ginsberg JB, Kearon C, et al (1999). "A randomized trial comparing 5-mg and 10-mg warfarin loading doses". Arch. Intern. Med. 159 (1): 46–8. PMID 9892329. [e]
- ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 Quiroz R, Gerhard-Herman M, Kosowsky JM, et al (2006). "Comparison of a single end point to determine optimal initial warfarin dosing (5 mg versus 10 mg) for venous thromboembolism". Am. J. Cardiol. 98 (4): 535–7. DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.02.063. PMID 16893712. Research Blogging.
- ↑ 13.0 13.1 13.2 13.3 13.4 Ansell J, Hirsh J, Poller L, Bussey H, Jacobson A, Hylek E (2004). "The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy". Chest 126 (3 Suppl): 204S–233S. DOI:10.1378/chest.126.3_suppl.204S. PMID 15383473. Research Blogging.
Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; name "pmid15383473" defined multiple times with different content Cite error: Invalid<ref>
tag; name "pmid15383473" defined multiple times with different content - ↑ Tait RC, Sefcick A (1998). "A warfarin induction regimen for out-patient anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation". Br. J. Haematol. 101 (3): 450-4. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00716.x. PMID 9633885. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Fennerty A, Dolben J, Thomas P, et al (1984). "Flexible induction dose regimen for warfarin and prediction of maintenance dose". Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 288 (6426): 1268–70. PMID 6424820. [e] [PubMed Central]
- ↑ Fennerty A, Campbell IA, Routledge PA (1988). "Anticoagulants in venous thromboembolism". BMJ 297 (6659): 1285-8. PMID 3144365. [e]
- ↑ Anderson JL, Horne BD, Stevens SM, et al (2007). "Randomized trial of genotype-guided versus standard warfarin dosing in patients initiating oral anticoagulation". Circulation 116 (22): 2563–70. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.737312. PMID 17989110. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Millican E, Jacobsen-Lenzini PA, Milligan PE, et al (2007). "Genetic-based dosing in orthopaedic patients beginning warfarin therapy" 110 (5): 1511-5. DOI:10.1182/blood-2007-01-069609. PMID 17387222. Research Blogging. Online tool based on the study.
- ↑ Point-of-Care Guides - May 15, 2005 - American Family Physician. Retrieved on 2007-08-20.
- ↑ Whitlock RP, Crowther MA, Warkentin TE, Blackall MH, Farrokhyar F, Teoh KH (2007). "Warfarin cessation before cardiopulmonary bypass: lessons learned from a randomized controlled trial of oral vitamin K". Ann. Thorac. Surg. 84 (1): 103–8. DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.03.014. PMID 17588394. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Holbrook AM, Pereira JA, Labiris R, et al (2005). "Systematic overview of warfarin and its drug and food interactions". Arch. Intern. Med. 165 (10): 1095–106. DOI:10.1001/archinte.165.10.1095. PMID 15911722. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Hylek EM, Evans-Molina C, Shea C, Henault LE, Regan S (2007). "Major hemorrhage and tolerability of warfarin in the first year of therapy among elderly patients with atrial fibrillation". Circulation 115 (21): 2689-96. DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.653048. PMID 17515465. Research Blogging. PMID 17515465
- ↑ 23.0 23.1 Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Piccioli A, et al (2002). "Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis". Blood 100 (10): 3484–8. DOI:10.1182/blood-2002-01-0108. PMID 12393647. Research Blogging.
- ↑ Crowther MA, Douketis JD, Schnurr T, et al (2002). "Oral vitamin K lowers the international normalized ratio more rapidly than subcutaneous vitamin K in the treatment of warfarin-associated coagulopathy. A randomized, controlled trial". Ann. Intern. Med. 137 (4): 251-4. PMID 12186515. [e]
See also
External links
- Warfarin - FDA approved drug information (drug label) from DailyMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine).