CZ Talk:Editorial Council Resolution 0007: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>Warren Schudy (typo) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If you can wrap your head around [[CZ:Editorial_Council_Resolution_0007#VI._Council_start-up_period.|this section]], I'll be impressed. If you want to propose a way of balancing new and old, authors and editors, etc., I'd appreciate it. It's a tricky puzzle. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:36, 26 February 2008 (CST) | If you can wrap your head around [[CZ:Editorial_Council_Resolution_0007#VI._Council_start-up_period.|this section]], I'll be impressed. If you want to propose a way of balancing new and old, authors and editors, etc., I'd appreciate it. It's a tricky puzzle. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 16:36, 26 February 2008 (CST) | ||
:Should be easy with a spreadsheet. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 21:07, 26 February 2008 (CST) | :Should be easy with a spreadsheet. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 21:07, 26 February 2008 (CST) | ||
::As such looks OK to me. However, if Robert can make it better, that'd be most welcome. [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten Sarbadhikari]] 23:13, 26 February 2008 (CST) | |||
:::Nevermind, I'm at a loss. It's irrelevant. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:20, 27 February 2008 (CST) | |||
::::Fine, I'm opening the amendments for discussion. [[User:Supten Sarbadhikari|Supten Sarbadhikari]] 21:00, 27 February 2008 (CST) | |||
In second paragraph of "council start up period", there's a sentence: "All Council members who fail to meet the criteria, '''and''' who do not confirm that they wish to continue on the Council, will be removed from the Council on the selection day." Shouldn't that "and" be an "or"? [[User:Warren Schudy|Warren Schudy]] 22:59, 9 March 2008 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:59, 9 March 2008
If you can wrap your head around this section, I'll be impressed. If you want to propose a way of balancing new and old, authors and editors, etc., I'd appreciate it. It's a tricky puzzle. --Larry Sanger 16:36, 26 February 2008 (CST)
- Should be easy with a spreadsheet. --Robert W King 21:07, 26 February 2008 (CST)
- As such looks OK to me. However, if Robert can make it better, that'd be most welcome. Supten Sarbadhikari 23:13, 26 February 2008 (CST)
- Nevermind, I'm at a loss. It's irrelevant. --Robert W King 09:20, 27 February 2008 (CST)
- Fine, I'm opening the amendments for discussion. Supten Sarbadhikari 21:00, 27 February 2008 (CST)
- Nevermind, I'm at a loss. It's irrelevant. --Robert W King 09:20, 27 February 2008 (CST)
- As such looks OK to me. However, if Robert can make it better, that'd be most welcome. Supten Sarbadhikari 23:13, 26 February 2008 (CST)
In second paragraph of "council start up period", there's a sentence: "All Council members who fail to meet the criteria, and who do not confirm that they wish to continue on the Council, will be removed from the Council on the selection day." Shouldn't that "and" be an "or"? Warren Schudy 22:59, 9 March 2008 (CDT)