Talk:Archive:Bold moves: Difference between revisions
imported>Thomas Mandel (What does "be bold" mean?) |
imported>Thomas Mandel m (typo) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is this page a good idea? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:42, 15 March 2008 (CDT) | Is this page a good idea? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 00:42, 15 March 2008 (CDT) | ||
==I like the idea of the page, I do not like the "be bold". One should not have to be bold to edit what should be there. Simple as that. I had the experience of working two weeks on one paragraph afterwhich someone came in from Wikipdedia, announced he was going to be bold, and replaced my paragraph with his. As if being being bold made him right. Having said that, having a page where "bold edits" are logged might be a great way to have both. This way "being bold" is meaningful rather than just a trivial circumvention of the process. Having said all this I still do not like "be bold" There must be a better word. For example. writing this letter was "being brave" What does "be bold" mean anyway??? [[User:Thomas Mandel|Thomas Mandel]] | ==::I like the idea of the page, I do not like the "be bold". One should not have to be bold to edit what should be there. Simple as that. I had the experience of working two weeks on one paragraph afterwhich someone came in from Wikipdedia, announced he was going to be bold, and replaced my paragraph with his. As if being being bold made him right. Having said that, having a page where "bold edits" are logged might be a great way to have both. This way "being bold" is meaningful rather than just a trivial circumvention of the process. Having said all this I still do not like "be bold" There must be a better word. For example. writing this letter was "being brave" What does "be bold" mean anyway??? [[User:Thomas Mandel|Thomas Mandel]] | ||
Revision as of 01:03, 15 March 2008
Proposal?
Should this be made into a proposal? --Larry Sanger 00:32, 15 March 2008 (CDT)
Good idea?
Is this page a good idea? --Larry Sanger 00:42, 15 March 2008 (CDT)
==::I like the idea of the page, I do not like the "be bold". One should not have to be bold to edit what should be there. Simple as that. I had the experience of working two weeks on one paragraph afterwhich someone came in from Wikipdedia, announced he was going to be bold, and replaced my paragraph with his. As if being being bold made him right. Having said that, having a page where "bold edits" are logged might be a great way to have both. This way "being bold" is meaningful rather than just a trivial circumvention of the process. Having said all this I still do not like "be bold" There must be a better word. For example. writing this letter was "being brave" What does "be bold" mean anyway??? Thomas Mandel