CZ Talk:Biology Workgroup/Biology Week/Pending decisions: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Reaction to this == | == Reaction to this == | ||
These are all excellent goals. But I disagree that we ''must'' have accomplished them before we can have a Biology Week. We have quite simply spent too long "getting ready" in this way, and we could probably do so for a couple more years. It's time to expand our ranks. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:14, 10 June 2008 (CDT) | These are all excellent goals. But I disagree that we ''must'' have accomplished them before we can have a Biology Week. We have quite simply spent too long "getting ready" in this way, and we could probably do so for a couple more years. It's time to expand our ranks. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:14, 10 June 2008 (CDT) | ||
:The reason I set the page up is that we need a basis upon which to structure the announcements (and the PLoS article in particular, as it will have a publication lag of about 8 weeks and should still be reflecting the cornerstones of CZ policy when published). So what we need is not necessarily final decisions but suitable phrasing for external use. -- [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 04:09, 11 June 2008 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 04:09, 11 June 2008
need for extra constables during workgroup weeks 24/7
I'm sure if we advertise big enough, we will get people signing up for workgroup week to try and spoil it with vandalism, etc.
We will need a massive constable effort during the first rounds of workgroup week.
We may want to recruit more constables so we can have them on 24-7. Tom Kelly 17:51, 9 June 2008 (CDT)
Reaction to this
These are all excellent goals. But I disagree that we must have accomplished them before we can have a Biology Week. We have quite simply spent too long "getting ready" in this way, and we could probably do so for a couple more years. It's time to expand our ranks. --Larry Sanger 22:14, 10 June 2008 (CDT)
- The reason I set the page up is that we need a basis upon which to structure the announcements (and the PLoS article in particular, as it will have a publication lag of about 8 weeks and should still be reflecting the cornerstones of CZ policy when published). So what we need is not necessarily final decisions but suitable phrasing for external use. -- Daniel Mietchen 04:09, 11 June 2008 (CDT)