Talk:Federation of Straight Chiropractors and Organizations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (→not being facetious: new section) |
imported>D. Matt Innis (→not being facetious: clarify maybe) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Don't you think that fairly near the top of the article you ought to have a little something about the "straight" vs. "gay" usage of the word now? I had to read *deep* into the article before I was certain of the intent.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 18:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | Don't you think that fairly near the top of the article you ought to have a little something about the "straight" vs. "gay" usage of the word now? I had to read *deep* into the article before I was certain of the intent.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 18:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I don't think we need to differentiate straight from gay, but in this case could differentiate early about straight vs mixer, which should still satisfy that curiosity. 00:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:37, 7 February 2009
not being facetious
Don't you think that fairly near the top of the article you ought to have a little something about the "straight" vs. "gay" usage of the word now? I had to read *deep* into the article before I was certain of the intent.... Hayford Peirce 18:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think we need to differentiate straight from gay, but in this case could differentiate early about straight vs mixer, which should still satisfy that curiosity. 00:37, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Health Sciences Category Check
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Developing Articles
- Health Sciences Nonstub Articles
- Health Sciences Internal Articles
- Health Sciences Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Complementary and alternative medicine tag