CZ Talk:Wishlist: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
imported>Thomas H. Larsen (→define: (feature on google): Reply.) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:The best way to achieve this is probably to display the definitions on the main article page, in the place currently occupied by the disclaimer. This is already listed, with priority 4. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 22:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | :The best way to achieve this is probably to display the definitions on the main article page, in the place currently occupied by the disclaimer. This is already listed, with priority 4. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 22:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
: This sounds like a most interesting idea, although I am unsure how to go about making Google recognise (and include) our definitions. --[[User:Thomas H. Larsen|Thomas H. Larsen]] 22:42, 17 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:42, 17 December 2009
Nice work Daniel
Hey Daniel. Thanks for putting the "Lack of active editors" on the wishlist. It belongs there. I will mention it on the forum. Dan Nessett 21:38, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Mark up too difficult for me
Would like to include forum thread msg http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,2846.msg23985.html#msg23985 re References, Citations etc. Anthony.Sebastian 03:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
- Not sure what this means. Where do you want to include it? On this talk page? If so, why not just copy/paste the text here? Dan Nessett 04:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
define: (feature on google)
when you type "define: proptosis" in to google you get a nice definition search.
Please make it so CZ definitions appear in this search.
Try out the define: feature on google ... works on mobile phone browsers too....
would bring hits to CZ!! Tom Kelly 22:04, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- The best way to achieve this is probably to display the definitions on the main article page, in the place currently occupied by the disclaimer. This is already listed, with priority 4. --Daniel Mietchen 22:31, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
- This sounds like a most interesting idea, although I am unsure how to go about making Google recognise (and include) our definitions. --Thomas H. Larsen 22:42, 17 December 2009 (UTC)