Open Knowledge Conference/Program/A Year in Review: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(started)
 
imported>Daniel Mietchen
(+video)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:


<!--Add a link back to the page of the session, e.g. [[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010 - Ideas and Culture]] -->
<!--Add a link back to the page of the session, e.g. [[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010 - Ideas and Culture]] -->
[[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010|Back to OKCon 2010 Program]]<br />
[[Open Knowledge Conference/Program/OKCon 2010 - State of the Nation|Back to State of the Nation session]]


==Title==
==Title==
<!--Probably the last part of the page title. -->
<!--Probably the last part of the page title. -->
A Year in Review
A Year in Review
<center>
{{#ev:vimeo|11220474|600}}
</center>


==Authors==
==Authors==
Line 28: Line 33:
and wikilink as appropriate.
and wikilink as appropriate.
-->
-->
Type comments here.
Intro from Rufus Pollock:


<noinclude>{{TlDoc}}</noinclude>
*[[OKFN]] is a [[not for profit organisation]]
**building on history of other orgs, such as
 
* Concept of 'open' goes back to Chinese book printing.
 
* Open is about technology
 
* Open requires people to declare it, via a license.
 
* OKFN has ~12 working groups and projects that are then attached to those groups.
 
* Other OKFN chapters launching = Leipzig launching in May
 
* if interested in forming your own group contact them (@EvoMRI did)
 
* "the year open data went mainstream" - data.gov.uk launched in January
 
* Props to John Sheridan and his political push for open data, e.g. data.gov.uk
 
* Central Gov't is changing their viewpoint towards open.
 
* CKAN powers data.gov.uk and is used by 5 other orgs = open catalogue
 
* "On our way to realising the Debian of Data"
 
* getting people together to interoperate with data
 
* most people suck at data - spreadsheets
 
* [God, I wish the Rewired State people would realise this. CSV dumps is leeches, XML is penicillin, RDF is an MRI scan. -Tom] <-- I like it (me too, but I'm MRI-biased)
 
* lots of people, not very co-ordinated
 
* "RDF is very high cost" [any more than writing a SQL schema? An XML format? CSV headers? I don't buy it. It is like the whole thing with type systems - yeah, you can do def foo(x, y) but you have to mentally keep track of the types in your head rather than letting the computer do it for you. -Tom]
 
* new OKFN WGs: EU, bibliographic information, development, archaeology
 
* bibliographic information - Swedish and German national libraries now publish linked data
 
* Exemplars
 
*  Where does my money go <http://www.wheredoesmymoneygo.org/>
 
* Open Shakespeare <http://www.openshakespeare.org/>
 
* Kforge
 
* Public domain works calc
 
* opendefinition.org
 
* PantonPriciples
 
* Open Database Licences
 
* Oneclickor.gs <http://www.oneclickor.gs/>
 
* OKFN built demonstrator to show whereealth, education, public, economic affairs, defence, public safety, social protection...etc
 
* money tracking via data is only skin deep, in the billions, not able to easily track in the millions.
 
* The 3 S's = Search, Storage and Services
 
* these three are the infrastratructure for our scoiety
 
* we are too happy with closed
 
* /end
 
* Q&A
 
* what's going on with open bibliographic data, who owns it?
 
* OKFN trying to work more with Cambridge and BL to publish bib data.
 
* What about in other countries?  How will it pan out for them?
 
* UK has been a leader in this area because of political push, i.e. TBL, etc.
 
* What about the political motivations?
 
* "Whoever wins will be committed to going down this route"
 
* Can't put the genie back in the bottle

Latest revision as of 17:26, 29 April 2010



Back to OKCon 2010 Program
Back to State of the Nation session

Title

A Year in Review

{{#ev:vimeo|11220474|600}}

Authors

Rufus Pollock

Keywords

open data

Abstract

Paste abstract in here.

Notes and comments

Intro from Rufus Pollock:

  • Concept of 'open' goes back to Chinese book printing.
  • Open is about technology
  • Open requires people to declare it, via a license.
  • OKFN has ~12 working groups and projects that are then attached to those groups.
  • Other OKFN chapters launching = Leipzig launching in May
  • if interested in forming your own group contact them (@EvoMRI did)
  • "the year open data went mainstream" - data.gov.uk launched in January
  • Props to John Sheridan and his political push for open data, e.g. data.gov.uk
  • Central Gov't is changing their viewpoint towards open.
  • CKAN powers data.gov.uk and is used by 5 other orgs = open catalogue
  • "On our way to realising the Debian of Data"
  • getting people together to interoperate with data
  • most people suck at data - spreadsheets
  • [God, I wish the Rewired State people would realise this. CSV dumps is leeches, XML is penicillin, RDF is an MRI scan. -Tom] <-- I like it (me too, but I'm MRI-biased)
  • lots of people, not very co-ordinated
  • "RDF is very high cost" [any more than writing a SQL schema? An XML format? CSV headers? I don't buy it. It is like the whole thing with type systems - yeah, you can do def foo(x, y) but you have to mentally keep track of the types in your head rather than letting the computer do it for you. -Tom]
  • new OKFN WGs: EU, bibliographic information, development, archaeology
  • bibliographic information - Swedish and German national libraries now publish linked data
  • Exemplars
  • Kforge
  • Public domain works calc
  • opendefinition.org
  • PantonPriciples
  • Open Database Licences
  • OKFN built demonstrator to show whereealth, education, public, economic affairs, defence, public safety, social protection...etc
  • money tracking via data is only skin deep, in the billions, not able to easily track in the millions.
  • The 3 S's = Search, Storage and Services
  • these three are the infrastratructure for our scoiety
  • we are too happy with closed
  • /end
  • Q&A
  • what's going on with open bibliographic data, who owns it?
  • OKFN trying to work more with Cambridge and BL to publish bib data.
  • What about in other countries? How will it pan out for them?
  • UK has been a leader in this area because of political push, i.e. TBL, etc.
  • What about the political motivations?
  • "Whoever wins will be committed to going down this route"
  • Can't put the genie back in the bottle