Godwin's Law: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
mNo edit summary
imported>Sandy Harris
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
  | title = Godwin's Law
  | title = Godwin's Law
  | journal = TV Tropes}}</ref>
  | journal = TV Tropes}}</ref>
There is even a document called ''Godwin's Law FAQ -or- "How to post about Nazis and get away with it"''.[http://wiki.killfile.org/projects/usenet/faqs/godwin/]


==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}

Revision as of 22:30, 23 August 2012

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Godwin's Law began as a humorous observation about online discussions, by Mike Godwin, who later became general counsel of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The original formulation was:

As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches one.[1]

As it has evolved, it has spread to all online discussion, not just Usenet, and has become a guideline that when participants in discussion invoke Nazi analogies, all useful information exchange has ended. [2]

He has clarified that genuine historical references to National Socialism, in context, do not invoke the Law. It has been observed, however, that improper invocations of Godwin's Law also indicate the conversation has lost value. [3]

There is even a document called Godwin's Law FAQ -or- "How to post about Nazis and get away with it".[1]

References

  1. "Godwin's Law", Jargon File
  2. Mike Godwin, "Meme, Counter-meme", Wired
  3. "Godwin's Law", TV Tropes