CZ:Managing Editor/2010/005 - Editorial guidance for the WikiLeaks article: Difference between revisions
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
imported>Daniel Mietchen |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
=== Decisions by the governing bodies === | === Decisions by the governing bodies === | ||
=== | === Auxiliary policy === | ||
*[[CZ:Editors]] | |||
*[[CZ:Editor Policy]] | |||
== Draft decision == | == Draft decision == | ||
Revision as of 11:12, 6 December 2010
Statement of problem
Please be brief and specific in your request (polar questions are best) and add relevant links if available. Please state a time frame in which you expect a decision.
The article WikiLeaks needs editorial guidance in light of disagreements between two Editors. Both the Managing Editor and the Ombudsman have been invited to intervene. --Daniel Mietchen 15:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
Formal restatement of problem
This section defines the section structure of the decision.
Existing applicable policy
Charter
Decisions by the governing bodies
Auxiliary policy
Draft decision
The text below is what I plan to decide in this case. Feel free to edit the text if you think this improves it. If your edits require discussion, please use the dedicated section below. Editing and discussion in this "Draft decision" section shall stop 24h after my last edit to it.'
- As a first step, three other Politics Editors - Donald C. Church, Roger A. Lohmann and Jonathan B. Rubinstein have been invited to provide editorial guidance.
Discussion of Draft decision
When reading or editing this section, please keep in mind that the current version of the draft decision might be different from the one referred to by previous commenters.