User:John R. Brews/Sample2: Difference between revisions
imported>John R. Brews No edit summary |
imported>John R. Brews |
||
Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
===Examples using Bode plots=== | ===Examples using Bode plots=== | ||
====Borderline stable amplifier==== | |||
Two figures at the right illustrate the gain behavior and terminology. For a three-pole amplifier, the first of these figures compares the Bode plot for the gain without feedback (the ''open-loop'' gain) ''A''<sub>OL</sub> with the gain with feedback ''A''<sub>FB</sub> (the ''closed-loop'' gain). See [[negative feedback amplifier]] for more detail. | Two figures at the right illustrate the gain behavior and terminology. For a three-pole amplifier, the first of these figures compares the Bode plot for the gain without feedback (the ''open-loop'' gain) ''A''<sub>OL</sub> with the gain with feedback ''A''<sub>FB</sub> (the ''closed-loop'' gain). See [[negative feedback amplifier]] for more detail. | ||
Line 94: | Line 95: | ||
Comparing the labeled points in these two figures, it is seen that the unity gain frequency ''f''<sub>0dB</sub> and the phase-flip frequency ''f''<sub>180</sub> are very nearly equal in this amplifier, ''f''<sub>180</sub> ≈ ''f''<sub>0dB</sub> ≈ 3.332 kHz, which means the gain margin and phase margin are nearly zero. The amplifier is borderline stable. | Comparing the labeled points in these two figures, it is seen that the unity gain frequency ''f''<sub>0dB</sub> and the phase-flip frequency ''f''<sub>180</sub> are very nearly equal in this amplifier, ''f''<sub>180</sub> ≈ ''f''<sub>0dB</sub> ≈ 3.332 kHz, which means the gain margin and phase margin are nearly zero. The amplifier is borderline stable. | ||
====Stable example==== | |||
{{Image|Gain margin.PNG|right|350px|Gain of feedback amplifier ''A''<sub>FB</sub> in dB and corresponding open-loop amplifier ''A''<sub>OL</sub>. The gain margin in this amplifier is 19 dB.}} | {{Image|Gain margin.PNG|right|350px|Gain of feedback amplifier ''A''<sub>FB</sub> in dB and corresponding open-loop amplifier ''A''<sub>OL</sub>. The gain margin in this amplifier is 19 dB.}} | ||
{{Image|Phase margin.PNG|right|350px|Phase of feedback amplifier ''A''<sub>FB</sub> in degrees and corresponding open-loop amplifier ''A''<sub>OL</sub>. The phase margin in this amplifier is 45°.}} | {{Image|Phase margin.PNG|right|350px|Phase of feedback amplifier ''A''<sub>FB</sub> in degrees and corresponding open-loop amplifier ''A''<sub>OL</sub>. The phase margin in this amplifier is 45°.}} |
Revision as of 16:47, 3 June 2011
A Bode plot, named after Hendrik Wade Bode, is usually a combination of a Bode magnitude plot and Bode phase plot:
A Bode magnitude plot is a graph of log magnitude versus frequency, plotted with a log-frequency axis, to show the transfer function or frequency response of a linear, time-invariant system.
The magnitude axis of the Bode plot is usually expressed as decibels, that is, 20 times the common logarithm of the amplitude gain. With the magnitude gain being logarithmic, Bode plots make multiplication of magnitudes a simple matter of adding distances on the graph (in decibels), since
- .
A Bode phase plot is a graph of phase versus frequency, also plotted on a log-frequency axis, usually used in conjunction with the magnitude plot, to evaluate how much a frequency will be phase-shifted. For example a signal described by: Asin(ωt) may be attenuated but also phase-shifted. If the system attenuates it by a factor x and phase shifts it by −Φ the signal out of the system will be (A/x) sin(ωt − Φ). The phase shift Φ is generally a function of frequency.
Phase can also be added directly from the graphical values, a fact that is mathematically clear when phase is seen as the imaginary part of the complex logarithm of a complex gain.
In the figure at right, the Bode magnitude and phase plots are shown for a one-pole highpass filter function:
where f is the frequency in Hz, and f1 is the pole position in Hz, f1 = 100 Hz in the figure. Using the rules for complex numbers, the magnitude of this function is
while the phase is:
Care must be taken that the inverse tangent is set up to return degrees, not radians. On the Bode magnitude plot, decibels are used, and the plotted magnitude is:
In the next figure, the Bode plots are shown for the one-pole lowpass filter function:
Also shown in these two figures are the straight-line approximations to the Bode plots that are used in hand analysis, and described later.
The magnitude and phase Bode plots can seldom be changed independently of each other — changing the amplitude response of the system will most likely change the phase characteristics and vice versa. For minimum-phase systems the phase and amplitude characteristics can be obtained from each other with the use of the Hilbert transform.
If the transfer function is a rational function with real poles and zeros, then the Bode plot can be approximated with straight lines. These asymptotic approximations are called straight line Bode plots.
An example with pole and zero
The construction of Bode plots using superposition now is illustrated. To begin, the components are presented separately.
The figure at right shows the Bode magnitude plot for a zero and a low-pass pole, and compares the two with the Bode straight line plots. The straight-line plots are horizontal up to the pole (zero) location and then drop (rise) at 20 dB/decade. The figure below does the same for the phase. The phase plots are horizontal up to a frequency a factor of ten below the pole (zero) location and then drop (rise) at 45°/decade until the frequency is ten times higher than the pole (zero) location. The plots then are again horizontal at higher frequencies at a final, total phase change of 90°.
The Bode plot for a gain function that is the product of a pole and zero can be constructed by superposition, because the Bode plot is logarithmic, and the logarithm of a product of factors is sum of the individual, separate logarithms. The following two figures show how superposition (simple addition) of a pole and zero plot is done. The Bode straight line plots again are compared with the exact plots. The zero is assumed to reside at higher frequency than the pole to make a more interesting example.
Notice in the magnitude plot that the initial 20 dB/decade drop of the pole is arrested by the onset of the 20 dB/decade rise of the zero, resulting in a horizontal (zero-slope) magnitude plot for frequencies above the zero location.
Notice in the phase plot that the straight-line approximation is pretty approximate in the region where both pole and zero affect the phase. Notice also in this plot that the range of frequencies where the phase changes in the straight line plot is limited to frequencies a factor of ten above and below the pole (zero) location. Where the phase of the pole and the zero both are present, the straight-line phase plot is horizontal because the 45°/decade drop of the pole is arrested by the overlapping 45°/decade rise of the zero in the limited range of frequencies where both are active contributors to the phase.
Gain margin and phase margin
Bode plots are used to assess the stability of negative feedback amplifiers by finding the gain and phase margins of an amplifier. The notion of gain and phase margin is based upon the gain expression for a negative feedback amplifier given by
where AFB is the gain of the amplifier with feedback (the closed-loop gain), β is the feedback factor and AOL is the gain without feedback (the open-loop gain). The gain AOL is a complex function of frequency, with both magnitude and phase.[1] Examination of this relation shows the possibility of infinite gain (interpreted as instability) if the product βAOL = −1. (That is, the magnitude of βAOL is unity and its phase is −180°, the so-called Barkhausen criteria). Bode plots are used to determine just how close an amplifier comes to satisfying this condition.
Key to this determination are two frequencies. The first, labeled here as f180, is the frequency where the open-loop gain flips sign. The second, labeled here f0dB, is the frequency where the magnitude of the product | β AOL | = 1 (in dB, magnitude 1 is 0 dB). That is, frequency f180 is determined by the condition:
where vertical bars denote the magnitude of a complex number (for example, | a + j b | = [ a2 + b2]1/2 ), and frequency f0dB is determined by the condition:
One measure of proximity to instability is the gain margin. The Bode phase plot locates the frequency where the phase of βAOL reaches −180°, denoted here as frequency f180. Using this frequency, the Bode magnitude plot finds the magnitude of βAOL. If |βAOL|180 = 1, the amplifier is unstable, as mentioned. If |βAOL|180 < 1, instability does not occur, and the separation in dB of the magnitude of |βAOL|180 from |βAOL| = 1 is called the gain margin. Because a magnitude of one is 0 dB, the gain margin is simply one of the equivalent forms: 20 log10( |βAOL|180) = 20 log10( |AOL|180) − 20 log10( 1 / β ).
Another equivalent measure of proximity to instability is the phase margin. The Bode magnitude plot locates the frequency where the magnitude of |βAOL| reaches unity, denoted here as frequency f0dB. Using this frequency, the Bode phase plot finds the phase of βAOL. If the phase of βAOL( f0dB) > −180°, the instability condition cannot be met at any frequency (because its magnitude is going to be < 1 when f = f180), and the distance of the phase at f0dB in degrees above −180° is called the phase margin.
If a simple yes or no on the stability issue is all that is needed, the amplifier is stable if f0dB < f180. This criterion is sufficient to predict stability only for amplifiers satisfying some restrictions on their pole and zero positions (minimum phase systems). Although these restrictions usually are met, if they are not another method must be used, such as the Nyquist plot.[2][3]
Examples using Bode plots
Borderline stable amplifier
Two figures at the right illustrate the gain behavior and terminology. For a three-pole amplifier, the first of these figures compares the Bode plot for the gain without feedback (the open-loop gain) AOL with the gain with feedback AFB (the closed-loop gain). See negative feedback amplifier for more detail.
Because the open-loop gain AOL is plotted and not the product β AOL, the condition AOL = 1 / β decides f0dB. The feedback gain at low frequencies and for large AOL is AFB ≈ 1 / β (look at the formula for the feedback gain at the beginning of this section for the case of large gain AOL), so an equivalent way to find f0dB is to look where the feedback gain intersects the open-loop gain. (Frequency f0dB is needed later to find the phase margin.)
Near this crossover of the two gains at f0dB, the Barkhausen criteria are almost satisfied in this example, and the feedback amplifier exhibits a massive peak in gain (it would be infinity if β AOL = −1). Beyond the unity gain frequency f0dB, the open-loop gain is sufficiently small that AFB ≈ AOL (examine the formula at the beginning of this section for the case of small AOL).
The second of the two figures shows the corresponding phase comparison: the phase of the feedback amplifier is nearly zero out to the frequency f180 where the open-loop gain has a phase of −180°. In this vicinity, the phase of the feedback amplifier plunges abruptly downward to become almost the same as the phase of the open-loop amplifier. (Recall, AFB ≈ AOL for small AOL.)
Comparing the labeled points in these two figures, it is seen that the unity gain frequency f0dB and the phase-flip frequency f180 are very nearly equal in this amplifier, f180 ≈ f0dB ≈ 3.332 kHz, which means the gain margin and phase margin are nearly zero. The amplifier is borderline stable.
Stable example
The last two figures on the right illustrate the gain margin and phase margin for a different amount of feedback β. The feedback factor is chosen smaller than in previous borderline stable amplifier, moving the the condition | β AOL | = 1 to lower frequency.
The upper of the two figures shows the gain plot. The intersection of 1 / β and AOL occurs at f0dB = 1 kHz. Notice that the peak in the gain AFB near f0dB seen in the borderline stable amplifier is almost gone.[4][5]
The lower of the two figures is the phase plot. Using the value of f0dB = 1 kHz found above from the magnitude plot, the open-loop phase at f0dB is −135°, which is a phase margin of 45° above −180°.
Using the phase plot, for a phase of −180° the value of f180 = 3.332 kHz (the same result as found earlier, of course[6]). The open-loop gain from the gain plot at f180 is 58 dB, and 1 / β = 77 dB, so the gain margin is 19 dB.
As an aside, it should be noted that stability is not the sole criterion for amplifier response, and in many applications a more stringent demand than stability is good step response. As a rule of thumb, good step response requires a phase margin of at least 45°, and often a margin of over 70° is advocated, particularly where component variation due to manufacturing tolerances is an issue.[7] See also the discussion of phase margin in the step response article.
References and notes
- ↑ Ordinarily, as frequency increases the magnitude of the gain drops and the phase becomes more negative, although these are only trends and may be reversed in particular frequency ranges. Unusual gain behavior can render the concepts of gain and phase margin inapplicable. Then other methods such as the Nyquist plot have to be used to assess stability.
- ↑ Thomas H. Lee (2004). The design of CMOS radio-frequency integrated circuits, Second Edition. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-83539-9.
- ↑ William S Levine (1996). The control handbook: the electrical engineering handbook series, Second Edition. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press/IEEE Press. ISBN 0849385709.
- ↑ The critical amount of feedback where the peak in the gain just disappears altogether is the maximally flat or Butterworth design.
- ↑ Willy M C Sansen (2006). Analog design essentials. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. ISBN 0-387-25746-2.
- ↑ The frequency where the open-loop gain flips sign f180 does not change with a change in feedback factor; it is a property of the open-loop gain. The value of the gain at f180 also does not change with a change in β. Therefore, we could use the previous values from Figures 6 and 7. However, for clarity the procedure is described using only Figures 8 and 9.
- ↑ Willy M C Sansen. §0526 p. 162. ISBN 0-387-25746-2.