Forum Talk:Competitors and Press

Help system	All recent posts	Back to top	Contact Administrators	Archives
Competitors and Press Discussion about anything regarding Citizendium's competitors and any press coverage about or affecting Citizendium

Pages: Content • Governance and Policy • Style • Management • Technical Issues • Requests for Help • Competitors and Press • Archived Boards

Archives

1

Google search results...

I noticed something that alarmed me.

Over the years I drafted many articles on the small, non-WMF wiki wikialpha.org. Since my return to the Citizendium I have ported a couple of dozen articles originally drafted on wikialpha to the Citizendium.

Citizendium is older, larger, and frankly, a lot more serious than wikialpha. So when both wikis had an article on a topic Citizendium's were showing up first. Then, a couple of days ago, when I was away from home, on my cell phone, I used google, thinking it would find the Citizendium article I was looking for. It didn't find it, it only found the wikialpha article, which I had not kept up to date.

Just now I googled Leila Boujnane, an article I started here three months ago. Google didn't find it.

Is this a temporary glitch? A well known problem - but temporary? Did a site-wide __NOINDEX__ get accidentally instantiated? I am going to ping Pat, because this could be serious.

Cheers! George Swan (talk) 03:31, 27 August 2022 (CDT)

• Okay Very High Temperature Reactor, the most recent article started by User:David MacQuigg, in May, showed up.

But Rainer Maria Rilke, started by Pat, in June? Did not show up.

Catherine Hooper, Stephanie Mack, which I started in March, showed up.

I started Steven David on April 1st. Steven David/Definition shows up. But Steven David does not.

I ported Mateo Sabog from wikialpha on April 2nd. It didn't show up, and neither did any of its subpages.

• I know articles I had recently started WERE showing up in the google results a week or two ago. George Swan (talk) 04:01, 27 August 2022 (CDT)

• My first draft of the Leila Boujnane article initially had a __NOINDEX__ on it, which I removed about ten minutes later, after I concluded there were enough references to support an article about her.

I'll be more careful about that. George Swan (talk) 11:31, 2 September 2022 (CDT)

My impression is that Google is using AI to assess the quality of articles and thus deciding where to rank them in relationship to other sites. Some of Citizendium's articles are ranking quite well (such as Google:One+way+encryption) and others, as George points out, seem not to show up at all. But, those are topics that are typically covered extensively by other websites. I've about come to the conclusion that the best thing we can do to increase visibility in Google, at this point, is to generate very high quality contents. Note also that, often, the snippet Google decides to display about one of our articles will come from down in the middle somewhere, something that Google thought was newsworthy. That's why I think they use AI to rank the articles.Pat Palmer (talk) 09:47, 6 February 2023 (CST)

Interesting research paper

See [1]. At a quick glance, the paper itself seems to be non-free access. Peter Jackson (talk) 04:54, 6 February 2023 (CST)

A tempest in a teapot, to me. Despite Wikipedia's insistence that every single sentence has to point to a source somewhere, they still get much wrong and omit important historical information due to bias that can't easily be detected or measured--such as a town disassociating itself from an unsavory past.Pat Palmer (talk) 09:51, 6 February 2023 (CST)