User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Summary: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen
m (formatting)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{AccountNotLive}}
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}}
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}}


:::;;;<blockquote>''What if everyone in the world were in your lab – a ‘hive mind’ of sorts, but composed of countless creative intellects rather than mindless worker ants, and one in which resources, reagents and effort could be shared, along with ideas, in a manner not dictated by institutional and geographical constraints?&nbsp;&mdash;&nbsp;[http://dmm.biologists.org/content/2/5-6/201 Chris Patil and Vivian Siegel]''</blockquote>


<center><BIG>
<BIG>
If you want to make scholarly publishing editable, wikis provide a viable way to do so.
Wikis
</BIG></center>
*provide the opportunity to structure digitally published items more [[context]]ually than stand-alone articles (particularly print-based ones) allow for
*are compatible with any mode of [[peer review]] tested so far
*can be integrated with every step of the [[research cycle]], so as to highlight research as a process and improve reproducibility
</BIG>

Latest revision as of 03:41, 22 November 2023


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.



The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Session start · Talk start · Quotes · Background · Wikis as science communication platforms ·
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing · Prototypes · Editorial policies · Guided tour ·
Obstacles · Alternatives · Outlook · Summary · Slides · Video · Q & A · Demo

What if everyone in the world were in your lab – a ‘hive mind’ of sorts, but composed of countless creative intellects rather than mindless worker ants, and one in which resources, reagents and effort could be shared, along with ideas, in a manner not dictated by institutional and geographical constraints? — Chris Patil and Vivian Siegel

Wikis

  • provide the opportunity to structure digitally published items more contextually than stand-alone articles (particularly print-based ones) allow for
  • are compatible with any mode of peer review tested so far
  • can be integrated with every step of the research cycle, so as to highlight research as a process and improve reproducibility