User:John R. Brews/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>John R. Brews
No edit summary
 
(19 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
===Interacting atoms===
{{AccountNotLive}}
The outline of paramagnetism above ignores all interactions between atoms, and makes them all act individually. A natural question is: if the torque aligning atoms is due to the magnetic field in the atom's vicinity, shouldn't the field include the effect of the neighboring atoms upon the field?
==Tensor==
In ''physics'' a '''tensor''' in its simplest form is a proportionality factor between two [[vector]] quantities that may differ in both magnitude and direction, and which is a relation that remains the same under changes in the coordinate system. Mathematically this relationship in some particular coordinate system is:


Such a modified theory was proposed by [[Pierre-Ernest Weiss]] by introducing the notion of a ''molecular field'', a magnetic field contribution that was proportional to the magnetization in the vicinity of an atom:<ref name=Spaldin>
:<math> v_j = \sum_{k} \chi_{jk} w_k \ , </math>


{{cite book |title=Magnetic materials: fundamentals and applications |author=Nicola A Spaldin |chapter=§5.2 The Curie-Weiss law |pages=p. 53 |isbn=0521886694 |year=2010 |edition=2nd ed |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=vnrOE8pQUgIC&dq=Weiss+%22molecular+field%22&q=Curie-Weiss+molecular+field#v=onepage&q=molecular%20field&f=false}}
or, introducing unit vectors '''ê<sub>j</sub>''' along the coordinate axes:


</ref>
:<math>  
\begin{align}
\mathbf {v} & = v_1 \mathbf{\hat {e}_1} + v_2 \mathbf{\hat{e}_2} + ...\\
& = \left(\chi_{11} w_1 +\chi_{12}w_2 ...\right)\mathbf{\hat {e}_1} +\left(\chi_{21} w_1 +\chi_{22}w_2 ... \right)\mathbf{\hat {e}_2} ...
\end{align}


:<math> \mathbf{H_W} = \gamma \mathbf M \, </math>


where '''H<sub>W</sub>''' is the "Weiss field" and γ is the "molecular field constant". This contribution is added to the applied magnetic field '''H<sub>A</sub>''' to obtain the total field '''H''':
</math>


:<math>\mathbf H = \mathbf H_A + \mathbf H_W  \ . </math>
where '''v''' is a vector with components {v<sub>j</sub>} and '''w''' is another vector with components {w<sub>j</sub>} and the quantity <math>\overleftrightarrow\boldsymbol{ \Chi}</math> = {χ<sub>ij</sub>} is a tensor. Because '''v''' and '''w''' are vectors, they are physical quantities independent of the coordinate axes chosen to find their components. Likewise, if this relation between vectors constitutes a physical relationship, then the above connection between '''v''' and '''w''' expresses some physical fact that transcends the particular coordinate system where <math>\overleftrightarrow\boldsymbol{ \Chi}</math> = {χ<sub>ij</sub>}.


Given a method to determine '''M''' from '''H''', we then find:
A rotation of the coordinate axes will alter the components of '''v''' and '''w'''. Suppose the rotation labeled ''A'' is described by the equation:
:<math> \mathbf {\hat {e}'_i} = \Sigma_j A_{ij} \mathbf {\hat {e}_j} \ , </math>


:<math>\mathbf M = \mathbf M (\mathbf H_A +\gamma \mathbf M ) \ , </math>
:<math>\mathbf {\hat {e}_i} = \Sigma_j A^{-1}_{ij} \mathbf {\hat {e}'_j} \ , </math>  
an implicit determination of '''M''' for any given '''H<sub>A</sub>'''. In particular, if we adopt the Brillouin approach based upon ''B<sub>J</sub>'' as a function of
:<math>x = \frac{g m_B J \mu_0 H}{k_B T}\ , </math>
all that is needed is to replace ''H'' with the modified ''H'' above that includes the Weiss field.


Although this approach has some application to those paramagnetic and ferrimagnetic materials that are ionic solids with localized moments, it doesn't work for ferromagnetic materials because most are metals with itinerant electrons.<ref name=Spaldin0>
Then:


Chapter 9 of reference cited above: {{cite book |title=Magnetic materials: fundamentals and applications |author=Nicola A Spaldin |chapter=Chapter 9: Ferrimagnetism |pages=pp. 113 ''ff''|isbn=0521886694 |year=2010 |edition=2nd ed |publisher=Cambridge University Press |url=http://www.google.com/search?tbs=bks:1&tbo=p&q=ferrimagnets++next+section+%22molecular+field%22+inauthor:Spaldin&num=10}}
:<math>\mathbf v = \sum_i v_i \mathbf {\hat {e}_i} = \sum_j v'_j \mathbf {\hat {e}'_j} \ , </math>
and
:<math>\mathbf v = \sum_i v_i \sum_j A^{-1}_{ij}  \mathbf {\hat {e}'_j} = \sum_i \sum_k \chi_{ik} w_k \sum_j A^{-1}_{ij}  \mathbf {\hat {e}'_j} \ , </math>


</ref>
:<math>\mathbf w = \sum_m w'_m \sum_k A_{mk}  \mathbf {\hat {e}_k} \ ,</math>


<references/>
:<math>\mathbf v = \sum_i \sum_k \chi_{ik} \sum_m w'_m  A_{mk}  \sum_j A^{-1}_{ij}  \mathbf {\hat {e}'_j} = \sum_m \chi'_{jm} w'_m \mathbf {\hat {e}'_j} \ , </math>
 
so, to be a tensor, the components of <math>\overleftrightarrow\boldsymbol{ \Chi}</math> transform as:
:<math>\chi'_{jm}=  \sum_i \sum_k \chi_{ik}  A_{mk} A^{-1}_{ij} </math>
 
More directly:
:<math> \mathbf v' =  A \mathbf v =  A \overleftrightarrow\boldsymbol{ \Chi} \mathbf w = A  \overleftrightarrow{\boldsymbol {\Chi}}  A^{-1}  A \mathbf w =  A  \overleftrightarrow{\boldsymbol {\Chi}}  A^{-1} \mathbf w' \ ,</math>
 
where '''v'''' = '''v''' because '''v''' is a vector representing some physical quantity, say the velocity of a particle. Likewise, '''w'''' = '''w'''. The new equation represents the same relationship provided:
 
:<math>\overleftrightarrow\boldsymbol{ \Chi}  = A  \overleftrightarrow {\boldsymbol {\Chi}}A^{-1} \ .</math>
 
 
 
This example is a ''second rank'' tensor. The idea is extended to ''third'' rank tensors that relate a vector to a second rank tensor, as when electric polarization is related to stress in a crystal, and to ''fourth'' rank tensors that relate two second rank tensors, and so on.
 
Tensors can relate vectors of different dimensionality, as in the relation:
 
:<math> \begin{pmatrix}
p_1\\
p_2\\
p_3
\end{pmatrix}
=
\begin{pmatrix}
T_{11} & T_{12} &T_{13}&T_{14}&T_{15}\\
T_{21} & T_{22} &T_{23}&T_{24}&T_{25}\\
T_{31} & T_{32} &T_{33}&T_{34}&T_{35}
 
\end{pmatrix}
\
\begin{pmatrix}
q_1\\
q_2\\
q_3\\
q_4\\
q_5
\end{pmatrix} </math>
[http://books.google.com/books?id=gJA2oahuPSMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=tensor&hl=en&ei=orYKTZmeA4y-sQPN5NjBCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CE8Q6AEwCDgK#v=onepage&q&f=false Young, p 308]
[http://books.google.com/books?id=aWWWyXthnq8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=tensor&hl=en&ei=WsgKTdDEE5P6sAOh46T9Cg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=6&ved=0CEUQ6AEwBTgU#v=onepage&q&f=false Akivis p. 55]
[http://books.google.com/books?id=7xRlVTVSNpQC&printsec=frontcover&dq=tensor&hl=en&ei=WsgKTdDEE5P6sAOh46T9Cg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEwQ6AEwBjgU#v=onepage&q&f=false p1]
[http://books.google.com/books?id=pgCx01lds9UC&printsec=frontcover&dq=tensor&hl=en&ei=WsgKTdDEE5P6sAOh46T9Cg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CF8Q6AEwCTgU#v=onepage&q&f=false p6]
[http://books.google.com/books?id=gWPH3e-xYHMC&pg=PA1&dq=tensor&hl=en&ei=IMoKTbCHH5OssAOiobWSCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDYQ6AEwAzge#v=onepage&q&f=false tensor algebra p. 1]
[http://books.google.com/books?id=-4baDJnuH-sC&pg=PA1&dq=tensor&hl=en&ei=IMoKTbCHH5OssAOiobWSCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CEYQ6AEwBjge#v=onepage&q&f=false intro]
[http://books.google.com/books?id=oTeGXkg0tn0C&printsec=frontcover&dq=tensor&hl=en&ei=_coKTZ-KG4X2tgOAtvzVCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAjgo#v=onepage&q&f=false p. 427; ch 14]
[http://books.google.com/books?id=KCgZAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA58&dq=tensor&hl=en&ei=tcsKTbSvDIK8sQPkxNnYCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CFAQ6AEwBzgy#v=onepage&q=tensor&f=false Weyl]
[http://books.google.com/books?id=14fn03iJ2r8C&pg=PA145&dq=tensor&hl=en&ei=IcwKTdu9IY_CsAPyj-GUCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBDhG#v=onepage&q=tensor&f=false What is a tensor] [http://books.google.com/books?id=LVTYjmcdvPwC&pg=PA10&dq=negative++%22cyclic+order%22&hl=en&ei=zNUlTbbaBY34sAPdtb3_AQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CDQQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=negative%20%20%22cyclic%20order%22&f=false tensor as operator]

Latest revision as of 04:07, 22 November 2023


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Tensor

In physics a tensor in its simplest form is a proportionality factor between two vector quantities that may differ in both magnitude and direction, and which is a relation that remains the same under changes in the coordinate system. Mathematically this relationship in some particular coordinate system is:

or, introducing unit vectors êj along the coordinate axes:

where v is a vector with components {vj} and w is another vector with components {wj} and the quantity = {χij} is a tensor. Because v and w are vectors, they are physical quantities independent of the coordinate axes chosen to find their components. Likewise, if this relation between vectors constitutes a physical relationship, then the above connection between v and w expresses some physical fact that transcends the particular coordinate system where = {χij}.

A rotation of the coordinate axes will alter the components of v and w. Suppose the rotation labeled A is described by the equation:

Then:

and

so, to be a tensor, the components of transform as:

More directly:

where v' = v because v is a vector representing some physical quantity, say the velocity of a particle. Likewise, w' = w. The new equation represents the same relationship provided:


This example is a second rank tensor. The idea is extended to third rank tensors that relate a vector to a second rank tensor, as when electric polarization is related to stress in a crystal, and to fourth rank tensors that relate two second rank tensors, and so on.

Tensors can relate vectors of different dimensionality, as in the relation:

Young, p 308 Akivis p. 55 p1 p6 tensor algebra p. 1 intro p. 427; ch 14 Weyl What is a tensor tensor as operator