Larkin Reynolds: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
George Swan (talk | contribs) (first draft) |
John Leach (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "counter-terrorism" to "counterterrorism") |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| footnotes = | | footnotes = | ||
}} | }} | ||
'''Larkin Reynolds''' is an [[ | '''Larkin Reynolds''' is an [[United States of America|American]] lawyer and counterterrorism specialist.<ref name=LawfareLarkin/><ref name=WilmerHaleLarkin/> Reynolds is a frequent contributor to Lawfare. At Harvard, Reynolds studied under terrorism expert Jessica Stern.<ref name=Chronicla2010-06-20/> While a student, Reynolds interned at the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps, and the National Security Division of the Department of Justice. While at Harvard Law School, Reynolds was the founding editor of the Harvard National Security Journal. In 2010 and 2011 Reynolds was a fellow at the Brooking Institute. In 2011 she joined the law firm Wilmer Hale. | ||
In May 2011 Reynolds was a co-author of a paper entitled ''"[[The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0: The Guantánamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking]]"'', that argued that Judges were being forced to '''make''' the law, since the laws on fighting counterterrorism, and, specifically, the laws on the legality of detaining suspects indefinitely, without charge, were poorly defined.<ref name=brookings2011-05-12/> | |||
==Education== | ==Education== | ||
| Line 75: | Line 77: | ||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
<ref name=brookings2011-05-12> | |||
{{cite news | {{cite news | ||
| url = | | url = https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-emerging-law-of-detention-2-0-the-guantanamo-habeas-cases-as-lawmaking/ | ||
| title = | | title = The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0: The Guantánamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking | ||
| work = | | work = [[Brookings Institution]] | ||
| author = | | author = Larkin Reynolds, [[Benjamin Wittes]], [[Robert M. Chesney]] | ||
| date = | | date = 2011-05-12 | ||
| page = | | page = | ||
| location = | | location = | ||
| Line 86: | Line 89: | ||
| language = | | language = | ||
| trans-title = | | trans-title = | ||
| archiveurl = | | archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20211227223053/https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-emerging-law-of-detention-2-0-the-guantanamo-habeas-cases-as-lawmaking/ | ||
| archivedate = | | archivedate = 2021-12-28 | ||
| accessdate = 2022-03-30 | | accessdate = 2022-03-30 | ||
| url-status = live | | url-status = live | ||
| quote = | | quote = This state of affairs puts a premium on these cases not merely as a means of deciding the fate of the individuals in question but as a law-making exercise with broad implications for the future. <!-- The law established in these cases will in all likelihood govern not merely the Guantánamo detentions themselves but any other detentions around the world over which American courts might acquire habeas jurisdiction—although, as we discuss briefly below, the prospects for wider habeas jurisdiction are unclear. What’s more, to the extent that these cases establish substantive and procedural rules governing the application of law-of-war detention powers in general, they could end up impacting detentions far beyond those immediately supervised by the federal courts; indeed, they might even have an indirect but significant impact on superficially unrelated military activities, such as the planning of operations and decisions to target suspected enemy combatants with lethal force. In short, the legislature’s passivity to date combined with President Obama’s decision not to seek new law to address these questions have together delegated to the courts a remarkable task: defining the rules of military detention. --> | ||
}} | }} | ||
[https://web.archive.org/web/20211227223053/https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-emerging-law-of-detention-2-0-the-guantanamo-habeas-cases-as-lawmaking/ mirror 2021-12-28] | |||
</ref> | </ref> | ||
| Line 98: | Line 102: | ||
| url = http://www.lawfareblog.com/author/larkin/ | | url = http://www.lawfareblog.com/author/larkin/ | ||
| title = Posts by Larkin Reynolds | | title = Posts by Larkin Reynolds | ||
| work = [[Lawfare] | | work = [[Lawfare]] | ||
| author = | | author = | ||
| date = | | date = | ||
Latest revision as of 04:34, 21 March 2024
| Larkin Reynolds | |
|---|---|
| Occupation | lawyer |
Larkin Reynolds is an American lawyer and counterterrorism specialist.[1][2] Reynolds is a frequent contributor to Lawfare. At Harvard, Reynolds studied under terrorism expert Jessica Stern.[3] While a student, Reynolds interned at the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps, and the National Security Division of the Department of Justice. While at Harvard Law School, Reynolds was the founding editor of the Harvard National Security Journal. In 2010 and 2011 Reynolds was a fellow at the Brooking Institute. In 2011 she joined the law firm Wilmer Hale.
In May 2011 Reynolds was a co-author of a paper entitled "The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0: The Guantánamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking", that argued that Judges were being forced to make the law, since the laws on fighting counterterrorism, and, specifically, the laws on the legality of detaining suspects indefinitely, without charge, were poorly defined.[4]
Education
| year | degree | institution | details |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | B.A. | New York University | International Relations |
| 2010 | J.D. | Harvard Law School | Law degree |
References
- ↑ Posts by Larkin Reynolds, Lawfare. Retrieved on 2012-07-16.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Larkin Reynolds: Associate. Wilmer Hale. Retrieved on 2012-07-17.
- ↑ A Terrorism Expert Turns Her Gaze Inward". The Chronicle Review. 2010-06-20. https://chronicle.com/article/A-Terrorism-Expert-Turns-Her/65989/. Retrieved, The Chronicle Review, 2010-06-20. Retrieved on 2012-07-16. “During an informal class session held at her home, Stern told the students about her latest work and about what led her to pursue it. Her students say Stern's "intellectual honesty," as one of them, Larkin Reynolds, put it, allowed them to have deeper discussions and to take scholarly risks, arguing over such potentially incendiary ideas as the morality of torture.”
- ↑ Larkin Reynolds, Benjamin Wittes, Robert M. Chesney. The Emerging Law of Detention 2.0: The Guantánamo Habeas Cases as Lawmaking, Brookings Institution, 2011-05-12. Retrieved on 2022-03-30. “This state of affairs puts a premium on these cases not merely as a means of deciding the fate of the individuals in question but as a law-making exercise with broad implications for the future.” mirror 2021-12-28