Talk:Office for the Administrative Review of Detained Enemy Combatants: Difference between revisions
imported>J. Noel Chiappa m (Fix problem with WPauthor) |
George Swan (talk | contribs) (→Should this article be kept or deleted?: new section) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
No from wikipedia discalimer is necessary. Cheers! |[[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 16:59, 26 October 2007 (CDT)}} | No from wikipedia discalimer is necessary. Cheers! |[[User:George Swan|George Swan]] 16:59, 26 October 2007 (CDT)}} | ||
== Should this article be kept or deleted? == | |||
Should this article be kept or deleted? | |||
John Leach [https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Office_for_the_Administrative_Review_of_Detained_Enemy_Combatants&diff=931517&oldid=929193 tagged] this article for deletion on 2024-03-13, without however providing any justification for doing so, either here on the talk page, or in his edit summary. | |||
Personally, I don't think there is any doubt that this agency, and the tribunals it operated, were extremely important, so I think the article should be kept. [[User:George Swan|George Swan]] ([[User talk:George Swan|talk]]) 13:45, 10 May 2024 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 13:45, 10 May 2024
The metadata subpage is missing. You can start it via filling in this form or by following the instructions that come up after clicking on the [show] link to the right. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. | |
In lieu of WP notice:
I was essentially the sole author of a version of this article that appeared on the wikipedia. [1] No from wikipedia discalimer is necessary. Cheers! | |
George Swan 16:59, 26 October 2007 (CDT) |
Should this article be kept or deleted?
Should this article be kept or deleted?
John Leach tagged this article for deletion on 2024-03-13, without however providing any justification for doing so, either here on the talk page, or in his edit summary.
Personally, I don't think there is any doubt that this agency, and the tribunals it operated, were extremely important, so I think the article should be kept. George Swan (talk) 13:45, 10 May 2024 (CDT)