Talk:Magnocellular neurosecretory cell: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Please note, this article was imported from WP; but I wholly wrote it there[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 22:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | Please note, this article was imported from WP; but I wholly wrote it there[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 22:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Enjoyable article that proves I really need new glasses. Initially, my vision center interpreted it as "magnetocellular", and I wondered if you and Daniel had come up with a neuroimaging procedure that involved shaving the patient's head and sprinkling it with iron filings. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC) | :Enjoyable article that proves I really need new glasses. Initially, my vision center interpreted it as "magnetocellular", and I wondered if you and Daniel had come up with a neuroimaging procedure that involved shaving the patient's head and sprinkling it with iron filings. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC) | ||
::- One of my papers had an error that I only just spotted in proof - the copy editors had changed magnocellular to magnetocellular in the title. You ''never'' check the title in proofs. As I found later when another paper had "Oxytoxin" in the title instead of "oxytocin". I missed that one for years:-)[[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] 17:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
:::You clearly don't have the right sort of proofreaders. When finishing one of my books, the publisher insisted that the hand-marked galley pages must be returned in their entirety. To review, I carefully made a pile, on my dining table, of each chapter. My beloved editorial assistant of the time, Clifford (properly Clifford, Lord Chatterley), leaped effortlessly to the table, considered the work, and carefully deposited a hairball on each of two chapters. | |||
:::Informing my editor that if she really wanted those pages, I could arrange biologically safe shipping containers. She told me that she, as well, had feline editorial staff, understood the pages completely, and that I could just tell her if any changers were to be made on those pages. | |||
:::"Public key cryptography" is a perfectly valid technical term. Unfortunately, I got through an entire lecture before realizing I had written "pubic key" on the board, without a chastity belt in sight. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:58, 26 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:58, 26 December 2010
Please note, this article was imported from WP; but I wholly wrote it thereGareth Leng 22:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
- Enjoyable article that proves I really need new glasses. Initially, my vision center interpreted it as "magnetocellular", and I wondered if you and Daniel had come up with a neuroimaging procedure that involved shaving the patient's head and sprinkling it with iron filings. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:04, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- - One of my papers had an error that I only just spotted in proof - the copy editors had changed magnocellular to magnetocellular in the title. You never check the title in proofs. As I found later when another paper had "Oxytoxin" in the title instead of "oxytocin". I missed that one for years:-)Gareth Leng 17:37, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- You clearly don't have the right sort of proofreaders. When finishing one of my books, the publisher insisted that the hand-marked galley pages must be returned in their entirety. To review, I carefully made a pile, on my dining table, of each chapter. My beloved editorial assistant of the time, Clifford (properly Clifford, Lord Chatterley), leaped effortlessly to the table, considered the work, and carefully deposited a hairball on each of two chapters.
- Informing my editor that if she really wanted those pages, I could arrange biologically safe shipping containers. She told me that she, as well, had feline editorial staff, understood the pages completely, and that I could just tell her if any changers were to be made on those pages.
- "Public key cryptography" is a perfectly valid technical term. Unfortunately, I got through an entire lecture before realizing I had written "pubic key" on the board, without a chastity belt in sight. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:58, 26 December 2010 (UTC)