Terrorism: Difference between revisions
imported>Aleksander Stos m (typo) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(62 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Terrorism has many definitions and the concept is the subject of much controversy. The term ''terrorism'' was first used in the 1790s | Terrorism has many definitions and the concept is the subject of much controversy. The term ''terrorism'' was first used in the late 1790s by opponents of the [[French Revolution]] in reference to the Terror, the period of revolutionary history from June 1793 through July 1794, during which the Jacobins, led by Maximilien [[Robespierre]], eliminated many of their opponents among the French political elite and society, from aristocrats to peasants, through execution by guillotine. <ref> [http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=terrorism Online Etymology Dictionary - Terrorism] </ref> The three main reasons for the Terror were the strength of the counterrevolutionary forces, the lack of a parliamentary tradition in France that would have enabled the formation of stable political parties and tolerance for opposing views, and, most important, the war with foreign powers that began in April 1792.<ref>Dr Marisa Linton, "The Terror in the French Revolution," p. 1, at [http://www.port.ac.uk/special/france1815to2003/chapter1/interviews/filetodownload,20545,en.pdf]. </ref> For Robespierre, "Terror" meant simply "prompt, severe, inflexible justice"; and was "a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to the most pressing needs of the fatherland." (Address, National Convention, 1794). However, the terrorism of the French Revolution is not what is now generally meant by "terrorism". | ||
Russian revolutionary terrorism in the late nineteenth century was another antecedent that the present-day use of the term does not characterize. These revolutionary terrorists believed incorrectly that it would be possible to overthrow the Tsarist form of government by assassinating high officials in the regime. The simplicity of such a view, as it appears to us today, is only a reflection of the lack of development of advanced social theory at the time. It did not seem unreasonable in a time and place where the head of state, the Tsar, wielded such absolute power and so completely dominated the political landscape. A signal difference between these terrorists and those of today is that the former specifically targeted those individuals whom they believed responsible for social ills, poor governance, and injustice. In a famous incident in 1905, a socialist revolutionary refused to throw a bomb at the carriage of the Tsar's uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, when he realized that the carriage also contained the Grand Duke's children, who were not guilty of any crime in the eyes of the terrorists. [[Albert Camus]] used this incident as the basis for his play ''Les Justes'' (usually translated as ''The Just Assassins'', but more accurately ''The Just Ones''). Also, these revolutionaries called ''themselves'' terrorists, giving this noun the particular moral quality exemplified in that 1905 incident. By contrast, the terrorists of today decline this label that is instead applied to them by others, and they do not as a rule in their actions distinguish between individuals who are "guilty" of specific political crimes and those who are not: for them, it suffices to be a member of a social category or simply to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. | |||
Based on a survey of leading academics, there are at least 109 different definitions of terrorism (Schmid & Jongman 1988). A compiled analysis of this survey identified the following recurring elements: | Based on a survey of leading academics, there are at least 109 different definitions of terrorism (Schmid & Jongman 1988). A compiled analysis of this survey identified the following recurring elements: | ||
Line 79: | Line 81: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Throughout the 20th century, groups that engaged in terrorist activities were sponsored directly or indirectly by governments in furtherance of their | Throughout the 20th century, groups that engaged in terrorist activities were sponsored directly or indirectly by governments in furtherance of their political and economic aims. The Cuban Communist government of [[Fidel Castro]] was a notable supporter of insurgent groups in South America and Africa, often acting as a proxy for the [[Soviet Union]]. China under Mao tse Tung was a notably indiscriminate source of funding for some of the most violent groups, notably the [[Khmer Rouge]] in [[Cambodia]], which after gaining power, arrested, tortured and eventually executed anyone suspected of being "enemies", indiscriminately including professionals and intellectuals, ethnic Vietnamese, ethnic Chinese, Christians, Muslims, Buddhist monks and homosexuals. The apartheid Government of South Africa sponsored rebel terrorist groups in neighbouring [[Angola]] and [[Mozambique]] to destabilise their regimes. Under president [[Jimmy Carter]], the USA sponsored the [[mujahideen]] in [[Afghanistan]], including the [[Taliban]], in their insurgent campaign against the Soviet-backed government of President Najibullah. The Taliban, the most extreme fundamentalist group among the mujahadeen, eventually took over Afghanistan, with widespread massacres of Hazaras, a mostly Shia ethnic group <ref>[http://www.hrw.org/reports/2001/afghanistan/ Massacres of Hazaras in Afghanistan] Human Rights Watch</ref> Under President [[Ronald Reagan]], the USA covertly funded the [[Contras]], various armed guerilla groups that opposed [[Nicaragua]]'s ''Frente Sandinista de Liberacion Nacional'', the Sandinista Junta that ruled Nicaragua following the July 1979 overthrow of President Anastasio Somoza Debayle. Not ony the Sandinista government, but also groups such as [''Amnesty International''], ''Americas Watch'' and ''Witness for Peace'' frequently accused the Contras of indiscriminate attacks on civilians. Libya in the 1970's covertly funded the Provisional Irish Republican Army. Currently, [[Syria]] and [[Iran]] are supporters of Palestinian and Islamic fundamentalist groups whose tactics include attacks on civilians. | ||
==Characteristics of Terrorist attacks== | ==Characteristics of Terrorist attacks== | ||
Line 123: | Line 125: | ||
===Ireland=== | ===Ireland=== | ||
In Ireland, the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) was founded to try to end Northern Ireland's status as part of the | In [[Ireland (island)|Ireland]], the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) was founded to try to end [[Northern Ireland]]'s status as part of the [[United Kingdom]], and to establish a single united all-Ireland socialist state by armed force. The organisation was made illegal in both the UK and in the [[Ireland (state)|Republic of Ireland]], but was extensively financed by sympathisers in the USA <ref> BBC News [http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1563119.stm Rich friends in New York] 26 September 2001</ref>. The Provisional IRA's strategy during [[The Troubles (Ireland)|The Troubles]], as they were known, was to use violence to cause the collapse of the Northern Ireland administration, and to cause so many casualties among the British security forces that British public opinion would force the government to withdraw those forces, against the will of the majority Unionist community in Northern Ireland. Initially a small group with little support even among the nationalist Irish community, the Provisional IRA benefited hugely from the decision of the British government in 1971 to introduce internment in Northern Ireland. Internment - detention of terrorist suspects without trial, was a response of the Government to intimidation of witnesses in court proceedings, but the internment camps, in which large numbers of suspects were held indefinitely, became training and indoctrination camps for the inmates, and the lack of legal process provoked widespread discontent amongst the Nationalist community, and lost the British Government the "moral high ground" <ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/1737078.stm. Army 'warned against internment']BBC News 1 January, 2002</ref> | ||
Between 1971 and 1994, the armed campaign mainly targeted the British Army, the Royal Ulster Constabulary, the Ulster Defence Regiment, and economic targets in Northern Ireland, but it also included sectarian killings such as the Kingsmill massacre of 1976. | Between 1971 and 1994, the armed campaign mainly targeted the British Army, the Royal Ulster Constabulary, the Ulster Defence Regiment, and economic targets in Northern Ireland, but it also included sectarian killings such as the Kingsmill massacre of 1976. | ||
The IRA also took its campaign to England, including planting bombs in pubs in Birmingham, and they targeted British government officials, politicians, judges, and police officers | The IRA also took its campaign to [[England]], including planting bombs in pubs in Birmingham, Guildford, Warrington, Brighton, London's docklands and elsewhere, and they targeted British government officials, politicians, judges, and police officers. The armed campaign ended in 2005, allowing the political wing of the Republiican movement, [[Sinn Féin]], to enter into a power-sharing agreement with the Unionist political parties. During the campaign, it is estimated that the provisional IRA were responsible for about 1,800 deaths including 1,100 members of the security forces and about 600 civilians.<ref>[http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/ Conflict and Politics in Northern Ireland (1968 to the Present)] University of Ulster CAIN project</ref> While the Provisional IRA has disarmed, splinter groups such as the Real IRA and Continuity IRA remain a threat. | ||
===The Middle East=== | ===The Middle East=== | ||
Line 186: | Line 188: | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 06:00, 26 October 2024
Terrorism refers to any act, nearly always violent, unpredictable, and chaotic in nature, often targeting civilians, intended to create an atmosphere of fear in order to obtain a political objective. Terrorism has been practiced by both left-wing and right-wing political organizations, religious and nationalistic groups, revolutionaries, as well as — to use the somewhat controversial notion of "state terrorism" — armies, police, and security forces. Since non-governmental terrorist groups are generally small in numbers and have few resources available, they rely on dramatic and destructive hit-and-run acts of violence to seize the attention of the general population, thereby seeking to impose their influence through the publicity associated with their violence. Acts of terrorism include bomb scares and bombings, hijackings, assassinations, kidnappings, cyber-attacks, and attacks using biological, chemical, and — theoretically — nuclear weapons.
Definition
"Above the gates of hell is the warning that all that enter should abandon hope. Less dire, but to the same effect, is the warning given to those who try to define terrorism." quoted by Lord Carlisle in a report to the UK Parliament [1]
Terrorism has many definitions and the concept is the subject of much controversy. The term terrorism was first used in the late 1790s by opponents of the French Revolution in reference to the Terror, the period of revolutionary history from June 1793 through July 1794, during which the Jacobins, led by Maximilien Robespierre, eliminated many of their opponents among the French political elite and society, from aristocrats to peasants, through execution by guillotine. [2] The three main reasons for the Terror were the strength of the counterrevolutionary forces, the lack of a parliamentary tradition in France that would have enabled the formation of stable political parties and tolerance for opposing views, and, most important, the war with foreign powers that began in April 1792.[3] For Robespierre, "Terror" meant simply "prompt, severe, inflexible justice"; and was "a consequence of the general principle of democracy applied to the most pressing needs of the fatherland." (Address, National Convention, 1794). However, the terrorism of the French Revolution is not what is now generally meant by "terrorism".
Russian revolutionary terrorism in the late nineteenth century was another antecedent that the present-day use of the term does not characterize. These revolutionary terrorists believed incorrectly that it would be possible to overthrow the Tsarist form of government by assassinating high officials in the regime. The simplicity of such a view, as it appears to us today, is only a reflection of the lack of development of advanced social theory at the time. It did not seem unreasonable in a time and place where the head of state, the Tsar, wielded such absolute power and so completely dominated the political landscape. A signal difference between these terrorists and those of today is that the former specifically targeted those individuals whom they believed responsible for social ills, poor governance, and injustice. In a famous incident in 1905, a socialist revolutionary refused to throw a bomb at the carriage of the Tsar's uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, when he realized that the carriage also contained the Grand Duke's children, who were not guilty of any crime in the eyes of the terrorists. Albert Camus used this incident as the basis for his play Les Justes (usually translated as The Just Assassins, but more accurately The Just Ones). Also, these revolutionaries called themselves terrorists, giving this noun the particular moral quality exemplified in that 1905 incident. By contrast, the terrorists of today decline this label that is instead applied to them by others, and they do not as a rule in their actions distinguish between individuals who are "guilty" of specific political crimes and those who are not: for them, it suffices to be a member of a social category or simply to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Based on a survey of leading academics, there are at least 109 different definitions of terrorism (Schmid & Jongman 1988). A compiled analysis of this survey identified the following recurring elements:
Recurring elements of terrorism
|
Weinberg et al. (2004) explore why it is so hard to define terrorism. They emphasize the difficulties associated with all "essentially contested concepts," noting also such problems as conceptual "stretching" and "traveling." In an effort to solve these difficulties, they seek a consensus definition of terrorism by turning to an empirical analysis of how the term has been employed by academics over the years. Specifically, the well-known definition developed by Alex Schmid, based on responses to a questionnaire he circulated in 1985, is compared with the way the term was used by contributors to the major journals in the field: Terrorism: Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, and Terrorism and Political Violence. The 22 "definitional elements" of Schmid's definition are compared to the frequency with which they appear in these journals. If these elements appear frequently in both the Schmid definition and those employed by the journal contributors, they are then used to form a consensus definition of the concept. The most striking feature of this academic consensus over the meaning of terrorism is the virtual absence of references to the psychological element, heretofore widely thought to be at the heart of the concept.
The common elements of terrorism, as stated by Ganor (2002)[4], are “the use of, or threat to use, violence”; “the goal is to attain political objectives”; and “the targets of terrorism are civilians”. The most widely accepted legal definition is defined in Title 22 of the U.S. Code, Section 2656f(d), which states: "The term ‘terrorism’ means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against non-combatant targets by sub-national groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience."
Often the definition of terrorism varies among the various agencies of a country's government, an example of this is in the USA:
Agency | Definition |
---|---|
Department of Defense | The calculated use of unlawful violence to inculcate fear, intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological. [5] |
FBI | The unlawful use of force and violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives [6] |
State Department | Premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents, usually intended to influence an audience. [7] |
A very different definition was offered by the Director of International Relations Department of the International Progress Organisation, an international non-governmental organisation. According to this,
Terrorism is an act carried out to achieve an inhuman and corrupt objective, and involving threat to security of any kind, and violation of rights acknowledged by religion and mankind. [8]
State Sponsorship of Terrorism
There are basically three categories of state sponsorship of terrorism:
1. States supporting terrorism – “states that support terrorist organizations, providing financial aid, ideological support, military or operational assistance” (Ganor 2002) 2. States operating terrorism – “states that initiate, direct and perform terrorist activities through groups outside their own institutions” (Ganor 2002) 3. States perpetrating terrorism – “states perpetrating terrorist acts abroad through their own official bodies” (Ganor 2002) or perpetrating terrorist acts domestically (i.e. within its own borders). |
Throughout the 20th century, groups that engaged in terrorist activities were sponsored directly or indirectly by governments in furtherance of their political and economic aims. The Cuban Communist government of Fidel Castro was a notable supporter of insurgent groups in South America and Africa, often acting as a proxy for the Soviet Union. China under Mao tse Tung was a notably indiscriminate source of funding for some of the most violent groups, notably the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, which after gaining power, arrested, tortured and eventually executed anyone suspected of being "enemies", indiscriminately including professionals and intellectuals, ethnic Vietnamese, ethnic Chinese, Christians, Muslims, Buddhist monks and homosexuals. The apartheid Government of South Africa sponsored rebel terrorist groups in neighbouring Angola and Mozambique to destabilise their regimes. Under president Jimmy Carter, the USA sponsored the mujahideen in Afghanistan, including the Taliban, in their insurgent campaign against the Soviet-backed government of President Najibullah. The Taliban, the most extreme fundamentalist group among the mujahadeen, eventually took over Afghanistan, with widespread massacres of Hazaras, a mostly Shia ethnic group [9] Under President Ronald Reagan, the USA covertly funded the Contras, various armed guerilla groups that opposed Nicaragua's Frente Sandinista de Liberacion Nacional, the Sandinista Junta that ruled Nicaragua following the July 1979 overthrow of President Anastasio Somoza Debayle. Not ony the Sandinista government, but also groups such as [Amnesty International], Americas Watch and Witness for Peace frequently accused the Contras of indiscriminate attacks on civilians. Libya in the 1970's covertly funded the Provisional Irish Republican Army. Currently, Syria and Iran are supporters of Palestinian and Islamic fundamentalist groups whose tactics include attacks on civilians.
Characteristics of Terrorist attacks
Planning and organization
Terrorist attacks are planned to ensure the largest amount of publicity to spread their cause to the general population. An example is the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya, which took al-Qaeda nearly five years to plan.
When planning a major attack, the terrorists gather intelligence on the intended target such as its defenses and vulnerabilities. Logistics specialists assemble the weapons, communications equipment, and arrange transportation and escape routes for the team that will carry out the attack. Once all the preparations are complete, the terrorist team will execute the plan. Usually separate teams carry out each step for security reasons so if one team is captured, they can't tell about the other team.
Terrorist groups usually keep their plans secret, operating underground and away from the public and government authorities. Terrorists are often organized into small groups called terror cells which are part of a larger terrorist network and several cells can work together to plan a terrorist attack. Members of one cell usually only know about an adjacent cell, but aren't aware of any other cells. This means that if members of one cell are captured, the entire network will not be discovered.
Targets
He [the revolutionary] is damned always to do that which is most repugnant to him: to become a slaughterer, to sacrifice lambs so that no more lambs may be slaughtered, to whip people with knouts so that they may learn not to let themselves by whipped, to strip himself of every scruple in the name of a higher scrupulousness, and to challenge the hatred of mankind because of his love for it - an abstract and geometric love." Arthur Koestler [10]
The main targets of terrorism are civilians, because they are easy to attack and these attacks create an atmosphere of fear, leading to political discontent. Other terrorist attacks target specific targets such as diplomats or their facilities such as embassies and consulates; military bases; police; business executives and corporate offices; water supply and pipelines; power facilities such as power plants, dams and power grids; and transportation facilities such as airplanes and airports, subways, trains and train stations, and buses and bus terminals. Buildings of political and economic importance are targeted as shown during the 9-11 Attacks in 2001 when the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were hit, and the US Capitol Building was also targeted, though never attacked. [11] Most attacks on buildings are usually used to draw attention to the terrorist group rather than to cause death and destruction; though this is caused nonetheless.
Weapons
Bombing is a common terrorist tactic because of its simplicity and lack of the need of skill to create, plant, and detonate a crude bomb. Assassination, kidnapping, and assaults against well-defended targets require more sophisticated organization, planning, and weaponry. These bombs can consist of commercially produced explosives such as black powder, TNT, plastic explosives; or commercially available materials made into homemade explosives, such as fertilizer (ammonium nitrate) mixed with diesel fuel; these homemade explosives are called "Improvised Explosive Devices" (IEDs). [12] Bombs can be either explosive or incendiary and the most effective bombs usually employ a shaped charge that moves the force of the blast in a specific direction. Bombs can be detonated by time-delay detonators which rely on clocks, watches, and other timing devices; remote-control detonators which use radio or other electronic signals; command-wire detonators use a button which is pressed to trigger the explosion.
Many terrorists use automatic firearms such as assault rifles, pistols, machine guns and submachine guns or rifles with sniper sights. Some terrorist weapons are made outside legal arms factories, these include the Soviet AK-47 Kalashnikov assault rifle and the U.S. manufactured M60 machine gun, which are manufactured in the northwest of the Indian subcontinent. These illegally manufactured arms are called "improvised firearms." Terrorists have also used both small-sized and heavy-calibre mortars and rocket-propelled grenades or RPGs; the most widely used model being the RPG-7. [13] The RPG-7 can penetrate up to 12 inches of the ceramic and reinforced steel layers of armor that protects military and police vehicles. Another favorite weapon of terrorists is the hand grenade and incendiary weapons like the "molotov cocktail" (a glass bottle of gasoline).
Fear of terrorist use of chemical and biological weapons increased after the 1995 sarin nerve gas attack on a Tokyo subway [14] and the 2001 discovery of anthrax spores mailed in the United States. [15] Chemical weapons contain toxic chemical compounds, like dioxin or nerve gas, while biological weapons use living organisms or toxins like anthrax spores.
History
Early examples of terrorism were the actions of the Jewish Zealots. Known to the Romans as sicarii or dagger-men, the Zealots engaged in violent attacks on Roman occupation forces and fellow Hebrews who were accused of collaboration with the Romans. The next group to show characteristics of terrorism were the Assassins. The Assassins were a breakaway faction of Shia Islam called Nizari Ismalis who used the tactic of assassination of enemy leaders. The tactics used by the Assassins involved sending a lone man to kill an enemy leader at the cost of his own life, instilling fear in the enemy.
During Reconstruction after the American Civil War the Ku Klux Klan was formed by defiant Southerners waged a campaign of violence and intimidation against freed former slaves and supporters of Reconstruction. In the late 19th century, small groups of revolutionary anarchists were formed. These anarchists assassinated heads of state from Russia, France, Spain, Italy, and the USA. But their lack of organization and refusal to cooperate with other social movements made anarchism ineffective as a political movement. However, Communism was just beginning as an ideological basis for revolution, and the 20th century would bring about many new developments in terrorism in support of political aims.
The Growth of Nationalism
Nationalism intensified around the world during the early 20th century and it became a powerful force in the various peoples of colonial empires. Native peoples in Egypt and Vietnam rebelled against the colonial regimes, using dramatic acts which were described as terrorism. [16] The Black Hand was a group active before World War I that was involved in the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, Archduke of Austria which was considered an act of terrorism that started the First World War. [17] After World War I terrorism became an official policy in states such as Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union. Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin, the leaders of these states, used arrest, torture, imprisonment, and execution to bring fear to the people of the country so they would not question their actions.
Algeria
Perhaps the first example of a modern terrorist movement was Algeria's Front de libération nationale (FLN) which killed random French civilians in a campaign to win independence for Algeria from colonial rule by France. In 1956 France executed two Algerian rebels, which caused the FLN to kill 49 French civilians in three days, bombing beachside cafes and eventually raising the price of colonialism to levels too high for many colonial empires. By the end of the war in 1962, about 300,000 people had died.
The war was accompanied by extreme brutality on both sides. Terrorist attacks killed many thousands of French Algerians, other Europeans and Moslem "traitors", women and children were murdered indiscriminately in incidents that shocked public opinion in France. The French antiterrorist actions in response were ruthless: more than 8,000 villages were destroyed, and torture, summary execution and political assassination became widespread, systematic, and largely approved by the French government. The French repression included concentration camps like the "Ferme Ameziane," through which over 100,000 Algerians passed, and during the Battle of Algiers alone, over 3,000 suspects in Algiers police custody "disappeared." [18]. However, this repression merely led to increasing support for the independence movement and for insurrection and to a bitter anger against the French, and after the end of the war, the FLN slaughtered thousands of the "harkas", the Algerian soldiers who had fought with the French.
The FLN's success inspired rebel groups around the world to adopt terrorist tactics, including Basque separatists, Palestinian and Irish nationalists, and Marxist African and Latin American cabals. In all cases, the tactical message from the FLN was that terrorist attacks on civilians, by promoting public outrage could lead to vicious counter-terrorism, that would bring increasing number of recruits to the insurgency cause, leading, after a cycle of increasing violence and destruction, to eventual victory.
Ireland
In Ireland, the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) was founded to try to end Northern Ireland's status as part of the United Kingdom, and to establish a single united all-Ireland socialist state by armed force. The organisation was made illegal in both the UK and in the Republic of Ireland, but was extensively financed by sympathisers in the USA [19]. The Provisional IRA's strategy during The Troubles, as they were known, was to use violence to cause the collapse of the Northern Ireland administration, and to cause so many casualties among the British security forces that British public opinion would force the government to withdraw those forces, against the will of the majority Unionist community in Northern Ireland. Initially a small group with little support even among the nationalist Irish community, the Provisional IRA benefited hugely from the decision of the British government in 1971 to introduce internment in Northern Ireland. Internment - detention of terrorist suspects without trial, was a response of the Government to intimidation of witnesses in court proceedings, but the internment camps, in which large numbers of suspects were held indefinitely, became training and indoctrination camps for the inmates, and the lack of legal process provoked widespread discontent amongst the Nationalist community, and lost the British Government the "moral high ground" [20] Between 1971 and 1994, the armed campaign mainly targeted the British Army, the Royal Ulster Constabulary, the Ulster Defence Regiment, and economic targets in Northern Ireland, but it also included sectarian killings such as the Kingsmill massacre of 1976.
The IRA also took its campaign to England, including planting bombs in pubs in Birmingham, Guildford, Warrington, Brighton, London's docklands and elsewhere, and they targeted British government officials, politicians, judges, and police officers. The armed campaign ended in 2005, allowing the political wing of the Republiican movement, Sinn Féin, to enter into a power-sharing agreement with the Unionist political parties. During the campaign, it is estimated that the provisional IRA were responsible for about 1,800 deaths including 1,100 members of the security forces and about 600 civilians.[21] While the Provisional IRA has disarmed, splinter groups such as the Real IRA and Continuity IRA remain a threat.
The Middle East
In the years surrounding the formation of the modern state of Israel, Jewish paramilitary groups used terrorist tactics both to expel the British authorities (who then ruled Palestine) and to drive the Arab civilian population from their homes and villages in an attempt to create a territory within which Jewish settlers would be the majority. Prominent among these groups was the Irgun Zvai Leumi (IZL). In February 1944, Menachim Begin, then a commander of the IZL, announced the start of an underground campaign against the British authorities.[2], a campaign that included bombing the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, which killed 91 people. [22] After Israel achieved independence, Begin entered the political mainstream; he was to become its sixth Prime Minister, and a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize.
The Irgun campaign involved conquest and occupation of territory then occupied by Arabs. One typical target was the small Arab settlement of Deier Yassin.[23] In April 1948, Irgun fighters entered the village to expel the inhabitants, and, when they met some resistance, killed a large number of the villagers (exactly how many is disputed). This event, the so-called "Massacre of Deier Yassin", greatly added to the fear of the Palestinians, leading them to flee their homes and villages in increasing numbers, so accomplishing Irgun's objectives. In the process a large population of Palestinian Arab were made refugees, and indeed became "stateless".
In the refugee camps, anger and resentment, in continuing conditions of poverty and insecurity, provided the seeds for a resistance movement that itself turned to terror as a tactic. Yasser Arafat's Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) committed many dramatic acts of terrorism, including the massacre of 11 Israeli athletes during the 1972 Munich Olympics. But since the PLO's goals were political, rather than religious, Arafat distanced himself from terrorism. However, while the PLO itself turned from violence towards conventional political activity, other groups, particularly extremist groups of Islamic fundamentalists became active. Islamic fundamentalism spread throughout the Middle East, spawning groups such as al-Qaeda and Hamas. Hamas, the "Liberation Tigers" of Tamil Eelam, and other groups adopted suicide bombing tactics, not just to inflict damage, but for religious motivation. Many Muslims thought that the USA stood for immoral values, and many terrorists, such as Osama bin Laden, made the USA their primary target. These terrorists thought that destroying the USA would be doing the work of God.
Attacks on the USA
Some of the deadliest terrorist attacks on US soil happened in the 1990s, including the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing and the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, when 168 people were killed and another 800 injured. Several other American targets overseas were attacked including military installations in Saudi Arabia in 1996 [24] and U.S. embassies in Kenya in 1998. In response to this attack, the United States attacked several terrorist targets in Afghanistan and Sudan with ship-launched cruise missiles.[25]
But the deadliest terrorist attacks to date were the 9-11 Attacks when al-Qaeda hijacked four American airliners in a suicide mission, crashing two into the World Trade Center and one into the Pentagon; the fourth crashed in rural Pennsylvania when the passengers attempted to take control of the plane. The attacks killed nearly 3,000 people. Shortly after these attacks US president George W. Bush declared a global war on terrorism in 2001. After 2001, terrorist attacks continued around the world, most notably the 2004 Madrid, Spain train bombings [26] and bombings in London, United Kingdom on one double-decker bus and three London Underground trains in 2005. [27]
Chechnya
Currently amongst the most active terrorist groups are Islamic fundamentalist groups linked to insurgents seeking the independence of Chechnya from Russia. Chechen separatists have deliberately attacked civilian targets; in 2004 an attack on a school in North Ossetia left 300 dead, mostly children, and in 2002, Chechen commandos attacked a theater in Moscow taking 700 civilians hostage. But not all Chechen insurgents are terrorists, and Western governments, including the USA, have said that Russia has tried to portray all Chechens as Islamist terrorists in order to justify the harsh measures used to try to crush Chechen resistance. The US State Department has criticised the Russian government, saying that “the lack of a political solution and the number of credible reports of massive human rights violations, we believe, contribute to an environment that is favorable toward terrorism.”[28]
Sri Lanka
In Sri Lanka, The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (the "Tamil Tigers") is a separatist group that seeks an independent state in areas of Sri Lanka that are inhabited by ethnic Tamils. The Tamil Tigers have used conventional, guerrilla, and terror tactics, including 200 suicide bombings, in a civil war that has claimed more than 60,000 lives and displaced hundreds of thousands of Sri Lankans since 1983; a ceasefire was negotiated in 2002, but fighting resumed in 2006. Notable victims of terrorist action include Rajiv Gandhi, Prime Minister of India, who was assassinated by Tamil Tigers in 1991, and Sri Lankan president Premadasa, who was assassinated in 1993 [29]
Pakistan
On 27th December 2007, Benazir Bhutto, the former Prime Minister of Pakistan and leader of the Pakistan People’s Party, was assassinated in Rawalpindi by a suicide bomber as she was leaving an election rally. At least 20 other people died in the attack. This event followed a series of similar attacks on security and government officials, and it was the second suicide attack against her in the run-up to elections, scheduled for January 2008. She had returned to Pakistan in October 2007 after years of self-imposed exile; on the day of her arrival, she led a motor cavalcade through the city of Karachi that was hit by a double suicide attack that left 138 dead. It is thought that miltant Islamic groups are responsible for these terrorist attacks. Benazir Bhutto herself, claimed that, before the first attack, she had passed intelligence details on to ruling General Musharraf, about four suicide squads roaming Karachi. She claimed that they came from the Pakistani Taliban, the Afghan Taliban, al-Qaida and "a fourth group from Karachi". [3]
Bio-terrorism and chemical terrorism
The possible threats of Bio Terrorism – the release of germs or viruses, such as anthrax, and Chemical Terrorism – the release of poisonous chemicals, have raised wide concern, but so far there have been few incidents of either. A prominent exception is the activities of Aum Shinrikyo (Supreme Truth) in Japan.
Aum Shinrikyo is a Japanese cult founded in 1984 by Shoko Asahara, who initially preached meditation and non violence. Asahara decided that Aum should field candidates for the 1990 Japanese parliamentary elections. However, when none of its candidates were elected, Asahara accused the Japanese government of rigging the elections. Around this time that he started justifying murder on spiritual grounds, in a doctrine called 'poa', and he began to preach to his followers about an approaching nuclear apocalypse, a war between Japan and the U.S., and the group prepared to commit terrorist attacks to hasten that Apocalypse.
In June 1993, the cult released anthrax spores from its Tokyo office building/laboratory, but as they unknowingly used a non-lethal vaccine strain of Anthrax, the attack was ineffective. In June 1994, Aum used sarin gas in an attack in Matsumoto city that killed seven and injuring 144. The targets were three judges hearing a lawsuit over a dispute in which Aum Shinrikyo was the defendant. In March 1995, Aum cultists released sarin nerve gas in Tokyo's subway, killing twelve and injuring more than 5,000. After the attack, Japanese police discovered that Aum Shinrikyo had accumulated enough chemicals to make enough sarin gas to kill millions of people.
Asahara and other leaders of the sect were arrested, tried and found guilty. After Asahara’s imprisonment, Fumihiro Joyu became the new head of the organization. Aum changed its name to Aleph in 2000, forbid the use of poa, apologized for its past acts of terrorism and paid reparation to the victims of the Tokyo sarin attack.[30]
Types of Terrorism
- Bio Terrorism – the release of germs or viruses, such as anthrax
- Chemical Terrorism – the release of poisonous chemicals
- Cyber Terrorism – the electronic attack on critical computer infrastructure
- Nuclear Terrorism – the use of nuclear materials in a terrorist attack, either a nuclear bomb or a "dirty bomb" (highly radioactive chemicals spread by an ordinary exposive)
- Eco Terrorism - the use of acts of violence, sabotage, vandalism, property damage and intimidation committed in the name of environmentalism.
- Religious Terrorism - terrorism motivated by religion.
- Nationalist Terrorism -
Terrorist claims and statements
It is often said, especially by critics of the West and of capitalism, that terrorism is merely a label ascribed by those in power to those who do not accept their authority, and resist it with violent and unlawful means. On this view, whether someone is better described as a "terrorist" or instead as a "freedom-fighter" depends on whether the state's power is thought to be wielded lawfully and fairly. For example, the African National Congress (ANC) was characterised as a terrorist organisation by the apartheid South African government (and by the governments of the UK and USA), but strongly rejected that description. However, in 1963 Nelson Mandela, the leader of the military wing of the ANC Umkhonto we Sizwe ("Spear of the Nation"[31]), was sentenced to life imprisonment on terrorism charges. Mandela, at his trial, openly declared his involvement in planning sabotage:
"I do not deny that I planned sabotage. I planned it as a result of a calm and sober assessment of the political situation." Nelson Mandela, at his trial for terrorism in South Africa, 1963[32]
The policy of the ANC at the time was to attack military and government targets and to sabotage economic targets, and not to directly target civilians [33]. However civilians were occasionally victims of these actions; for example, in 1983, a car bomb in Pretoria outside the headquarters of the South African air force killed 16 people. [34] The ANC was legalised in 1990 and renounced violence; Nelson Mandela was released from prison in 1990, became a recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize in 1993, and was elected president of South Africa in 1994.
In marked contrast to the ANC, some other groups notably al-Qaeda[35], very deliberately target civilians. Terrorists typically try to justify their actions to nonbelievers as retaliation for perceived wrongs. Thus Usama bin Laden, leader of al-Qaeda, claimed,
"As for their accusations of terrorizing the innocent, the children, and the women, these are in the category of 'accusing others with their own affliction in order to fool the masses.' The evidence overwhelmingly shows America and Israel killing the weaker men, women and children in the Muslim world and elsewhere." Usama bin Laden, in Nida'ul Islam magazine, October-November 1996.
Usama bin Laden further reached back in time in 2004, claiming,
"God knows it did not cross our minds to attack the towers but after the situation became unbearable and we witnessed the injustice and tyranny of the American-Israeli alliance against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, I thought about it. And the events that affected me directly were that of 1982 and the events that followed -- when America allowed the Israelis to invade Lebanon, helped by the U.S. Sixth Fleet. As I watched the destroyed towers in Lebanon, it occurred to me punish the unjust the same way (and) to destroy towers in America so it could taste some of what we are tasting and to stop killing our children and women." Usama bin Laden, admitting responsibility for attacks of September 11, 2001, on videotape shown on Al Jazeera, October 29, 2004.
References
- ↑ The Definition of Terrorism Report to the UK Parliament, March 2007
- ↑ Online Etymology Dictionary - Terrorism
- ↑ Dr Marisa Linton, "The Terror in the French Revolution," p. 1, at [1].
- ↑ Ganor B (2002) Defining terrorism: Is one man’s terrorist another man’s freedom fighter? Police Practice and Research 3(4).
- ↑ United States Department of Defense, Office of Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Publication 1-02: Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms Washington , DC : United States Department of Defense, 12 April 2001 – As amended through 5 June 2003, p. 531.
- ↑ Counterterrorism Threat Assessment and Warning Unit, National Security Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Terrorism in the United States 1999: 30 Years of Terrorism – A Special Retrospective Edition (Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice, 1999), p. i.
- ↑ Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism, Patterns of Global Terrorism 2002 US Department of State Publication 11038 ( Washington , DC : State Department, April 2003), p. 13. This document further states: “For purposes of this definition, the term “noncombatant” is interpreted to include, in addition to civilians, military personnel who at the time of the incident are unarmed and/or not on duty.”
- ↑ Definition of Terrorism. The given definition, according to its author, excludes: acts of national resistance exercised against occupying forces, colonizers and usurpers; resistance of peoples against cliques imposed on them by the force of arms; rejection of dictatorships and other forms of despotism and efforts to undermine their institutions; resistance against racial discrimination and attacks on the latter's strongholds; retaliation against any aggression if there is no other alternative. but includes: acts of piracy on land, air and sea; all colonialist operations including wars and military expeditions; all dictatorial acts against peoples and all forms of protection of dictatorships; all military methods contrary to human practice, such as the use of chemical weapons, the shelling of civilian populated areas, the blowing up of homes, the displacement of civilians, etc.; all types of pollution of geographical, cultural and informational environment. Indeed, intellectual terrorism may be one of the most dangerous types of terrorism; all moves that undermine adversely affect the condition of international or national economy, adversely affect the condition of the poor and the deprived, deepen up nations with the shackles of socio-economic gaps, and chain up nations with the shackles of exorbitant debts; all conspiratorial acts aimed at crushing the determination of nations for liberation and independence, and imposing disgraceful pacts on them.
- ↑ Massacres of Hazaras in Afghanistan Human Rights Watch
- ↑ Arthur Koestler (1984) Darkness at Noon Bantam ISBN 978-0553265958
- ↑ Congressional Record - Senate (September 10, 2002)
- ↑ United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC), Terrorist Weapons
- ↑ Terrorist Weapons - Firearms
- ↑ Policastro, Anthony Gordon, Susanna The Use of Technology In Preparing Subway Systems for Chemical/Biological Terrorism April, 1999
- ↑ "The Anthrax Letters" Albion Monitor, August 16, 2002
- ↑ Greenberg, David Is Terrorism New?. History News Network (October 21, 2001)
- ↑ Edgerton, Keith How Did World War I Begin?. History News Network (October 17, 2001)
- ↑ The torture of Algiers Algerie-Watch website
- ↑ BBC News Rich friends in New York 26 September 2001
- ↑ Army 'warned against internment'BBC News 1 January, 2002
- ↑ Conflict and Politics in Northern Ireland (1968 to the Present) University of Ulster CAIN project
- ↑ The Bombing of the King David Hotel from the Irgun site
- ↑ NY Times Op-Ed article written by prominent American Jews (including Albert Einstein) critical of Menahem Begin's visit to the States, Dec. 2, 1948
- ↑ Chris Hellman, CDI Senior Analyst Victoria Garcia, CDI Research Intern [Chronology of Major Terrorist Attacks Against U.S. Targets (Nov. 16, 2001)
- ↑ Chris Hellman, CDI Senior Analyst Victoria Garcia, CDI Research Intern Chronology of Major Terrorist Attacks Against U.S. Targets (Nov. 16, 2001)
- ↑ CNN Madrid Bombings In-Depth Special
- ↑ BBC 7, July Bombings Overview
- ↑ Chechnya-based Terrorists Council on Foreign Relations website
- ↑ Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam Council for Foreign Relations
- ↑ Aum Shinrikyo MIPT Terrorism knowledge base
- ↑ Umkhonto we Sizwe (Military wing of the African National Congress): We are at War! Manifesto, December 16, 1961
- ↑ Medal of Honor for a terrorist Pittsbugh-Tribune Review, July 27, 2003
- ↑ African National Congress MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base
- ↑ 1983: Car bomb in South Africa kills 16 BBC
- ↑ al-Qaeda MIPT Terrorism knowledge base