Talk:Quaternions: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Catherine Woodgold
(→‎The inscription: More detail about the bridge story?)
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = Quaternions
|                cat1 = Mathematics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 3
|        underlinked = n
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Rilson Versuri|Versuri]] 06:10, 22 April 2007 (CDT)
}}


== The inscription ==
== The inscription ==
Line 16: Line 6:


:I like the bridge story.  It has dramatic appeal.  As I remember and as it was told to me, what he wrote was "<math>i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = -1</math>".  I think it would be good to put this, perhaps in parentheses, right into the sentence of the article where it talks about him writing it -- or at the very least in a footnote (if someone can verify that that's what he wrote).  Did the incription stay up long?  Is there a plaque at the bridge talking about it?  It would be nice to get a bit more detail.  --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 19:38, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
:I like the bridge story.  It has dramatic appeal.  As I remember and as it was told to me, what he wrote was "<math>i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = -1</math>".  I think it would be good to put this, perhaps in parentheses, right into the sentence of the article where it talks about him writing it -- or at the very least in a footnote (if someone can verify that that's what he wrote).  Did the incription stay up long?  Is there a plaque at the bridge talking about it?  It would be nice to get a bit more detail.  --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 19:38, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
::John Baez wrote a bit about it at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/octonions/node24.html . -- [[User:Jitse Niesen|Jitse Niesen]] 20:20, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
:::Nice.  Could we put a link from the article to that web page?  --[[User:Catherine Woodgold|Catherine Woodgold]] 07:56, 1 May 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 14:52, 13 November 2007

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Numbers of form a + bi + cj + dk, where a, b, c and d are real, and i2 = −1, j2 = −1 and k2 = −1. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

The inscription

The story of the famous bridge inscription is told at some length in Conway and Smith (see Complex number#Further reading for a full reference) where it is described as "one of the most famous acts of mathematical vandalism in history". Greg Woodhouse 11:14, 22 April 2007 (CDT)

I like the bridge story. It has dramatic appeal. As I remember and as it was told to me, what he wrote was "". I think it would be good to put this, perhaps in parentheses, right into the sentence of the article where it talks about him writing it -- or at the very least in a footnote (if someone can verify that that's what he wrote). Did the incription stay up long? Is there a plaque at the bridge talking about it? It would be nice to get a bit more detail. --Catherine Woodgold 19:38, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
John Baez wrote a bit about it at http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/octonions/node24.html . -- Jitse Niesen 20:20, 24 April 2007 (CDT)
Nice. Could we put a link from the article to that web page? --Catherine Woodgold 07:56, 1 May 2007 (CDT)