Talk:Natural language: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer (adding article checklist) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
==Purpose of this article== | |||
It seems that a lot of this overlaps with other articles such as [[Linguistics]]. When I think of the phrase 'natural language', the links with computational linguistics and constructed/artificial languages come to mind. I think this should be emphasised; other passages could be moved elsewhere. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 04:34, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
:I still think this, for the record. :-) In my experience of linguistics, 'natural language' is only ever used in reference to computation and artificial language. I think this article should emphasise these two fields. The rest can go on [[language]] - rewritten so it's not from Wikipedia. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 19:44, 31 October 2007 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 01:36, 11 November 2007
Purpose of this article
It seems that a lot of this overlaps with other articles such as Linguistics. When I think of the phrase 'natural language', the links with computational linguistics and constructed/artificial languages come to mind. I think this should be emphasised; other passages could be moved elsewhere. John Stephenson 04:34, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
- I still think this, for the record. :-) In my experience of linguistics, 'natural language' is only ever used in reference to computation and artificial language. I think this article should emphasise these two fields. The rest can go on language - rewritten so it's not from Wikipedia. John Stephenson 19:44, 31 October 2007 (CDT)