Talk:History of processors: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Pat Palmer (more suggestions for future directions of this article) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| Line 17: | Line 7: | ||
==stored program and Von Neumann architecture ideas do not belong here== | ==stored program and Von Neumann architecture ideas do not belong here== | ||
I think these discussions go into [[computer architecture]] or [[history of computing]] because they address the overall interaction of all the components, not just the wiring and functionality of the central processing unit. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 13:53, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | I think these discussions go into [[computer architecture]] or [[history of computing]] because they address the overall interaction of all the components, not just the wiring and functionality of the central processing unit. Actually, ideas such as [[stored program]] and [[Von neumann architecture]] (program and data in the same physical memory) deserve (sub)articles of their own. [[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] 13:53, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:29, 3 November 2007
brought from CPU article
I just split this stuff out of the CPU article, which was becoming too long. This should integrate closely, somehow, with history of computing and computer architecture (or maybe history of computer architecture. Pat Palmer 13:44, 14 May 2007 (CDT)
stored program and Von Neumann architecture ideas do not belong here
I think these discussions go into computer architecture or history of computing because they address the overall interaction of all the components, not just the wiring and functionality of the central processing unit. Actually, ideas such as stored program and Von neumann architecture (program and data in the same physical memory) deserve (sub)articles of their own. Pat Palmer 13:53, 14 May 2007 (CDT)