Talk:Panic of 1907: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones (Connecting the dots) |
imported>Richard Jensen (headings) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==Connecting the Dots: An Agenda?== | ==Connecting the Dots: An Agenda?== | ||
The Panic of 1907 is a start point. The Federal Reserve is the end point. The article shows how the Panic caused the Aldrich-Vreeland Act and the National Monetary Commission. But jumped over the Election of 1912 and Pujo Committee, which I think were also important on the way to the Federal Reserve. --[[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 20:23, 17 November 2007 (CST) | The Panic of 1907 is a start point. The Federal Reserve is the end point. The article shows how the Panic caused the Aldrich-Vreeland Act and the National Monetary Commission. But jumped over the Election of 1912 and Pujo Committee, which I think were also important on the way to the Federal Reserve. --[[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 20:23, 17 November 2007 (CST) | ||
::Good points. They should get separate articles. But that is only one story line involved here--tyhere were other effects as well. For example, The Antitrust issue is a separate and quite important one. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 20:58, 17 November 2007 (CST) | |||
::True; and the article should point to them. RDJ [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] 15:47, 18 November 2007 (CST) | |||
:::OK, I added some. next I'll add some headings to divide up the text. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 19:41, 18 November 2007 (CST) | |||
==Style sheet== | |||
Russell, There is no style sheet except what is recommended in the chicago manual of style. Since different journals use different styles this might not be much use either. The {{tl|citation}} template might be useful if you want to be consistent with other CZ articles. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] [[User talk:Chris Day|(talk)]] 20:43, 17 November 2007 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:41, 18 November 2007
|
| Metadata here |
Connecting the Dots: An Agenda?
The Panic of 1907 is a start point. The Federal Reserve is the end point. The article shows how the Panic caused the Aldrich-Vreeland Act and the National Monetary Commission. But jumped over the Election of 1912 and Pujo Committee, which I think were also important on the way to the Federal Reserve. --Russell D. Jones 20:23, 17 November 2007 (CST)
- Good points. They should get separate articles. But that is only one story line involved here--tyhere were other effects as well. For example, The Antitrust issue is a separate and quite important one. Richard Jensen 20:58, 17 November 2007 (CST)
- True; and the article should point to them. RDJ Russell D. Jones 15:47, 18 November 2007 (CST)
- OK, I added some. next I'll add some headings to divide up the text. Richard Jensen 19:41, 18 November 2007 (CST)
Style sheet
Russell, There is no style sheet except what is recommended in the chicago manual of style. Since different journals use different styles this might not be much use either. The {{citation}} template might be useful if you want to be consistent with other CZ articles. Chris Day (talk) 20:43, 17 November 2007 (CST)