HIV screening: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Clinical practice guidelines conflict on the which populations should be screened with the [[HIV test]]. The conflict is whether the underlying prevalence to justify screening is 1% or 0.2%.
{{subpages}}
[[Clinical practice guideline]]s conflict on which populations should be screened for [[Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1]] with the [[HIV test]]. The conflict is whether the underlying prevalence of [[Human Immunodeficiency Virus]] to justify screening is 1% or 0.2%.


The [[Centers for Disease Control]] states:<ref name="pmid16988643">{{cite journal |author=Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, ''et al'' |title=Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings |journal=MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control |volume=55 |issue=RR-14 |pages=1–17; quiz CE1–4 |year=2006 |pmid=16988643 |doi=|url=http://www.cdc.gov/mmwR/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5514a1.htm}}</ref>
The [[Centers for Disease Control]] states:<ref name="pmid16988643">{{cite journal |author=Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, ''et al'' |title=Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings |journal=MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control |volume=55 |issue=RR-14 |pages=1–17; quiz CE1–4 |year=2006 |pmid=16988643 |doi=|url=http://www.cdc.gov/mmwR/preview/mmwrhtml/rr5514a1.htm}}</ref>
Line 5: Line 6:
:"Routine, rapid HIV testing is recommended for all adults except in settings where there is evidence that the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection is below 0.2%."
:"Routine, rapid HIV testing is recommended for all adults except in settings where there is evidence that the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection is below 0.2%."


The [[US Preventive Services Task Force| U.S. Preventive Services Task Force]] states:<ref name="pmid15998753">{{cite journal |author= |title=Screening for HIV: recommendation statement |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=143 |issue=1 |pages=32–7 |year=2005 |pmid=15998753 |doi=|url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/143/1/32}}</ref>
The [[U.S. Preventive Services Task Force| U.S. Preventive Services Task Force]] states:<ref name="pmid15998753">{{cite journal |author=US Preventive Services Task Force |title=Screening for HIV: recommendation statement |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=143 |issue=1 |pages=32–7 |year=2005 |pmid=15998753 |doi=|url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/143/1/32}}</ref>
:"strongly recommends that clinicians screen for HIV all adolescents and adults at increased risk for HIV infection". Regarding the definition of increased risk, the Task Force states "High-prevalence settings are defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as those known to have a 1% or greater prevalence of infection "<ref name="pmid15998753"/>
:"strongly recommends that clinicians screen for HIV all adolescents and adults at increased risk for HIV infection". Regarding the definition of increased risk, the Task Force states "High-prevalence settings are defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as those known to have a 1% or greater prevalence of infection "<ref name="pmid15998753"/>


A subsequent cost analysis supported the threshold of 0.2%.<ref name="pmid17146064">{{cite journal |author=Paltiel AD, Walensky RP, Schackman BR, ''et al'' |title=Expanded HIV screening in the United States: effect on clinical outcomes, HIV transmission, and costs |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=145 |issue=11 |pages=797–806 |year=2006 |pmid=17146064 |doi=|url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/145/11/797}}</ref>
A subsequent [[cost-benefit analysis]] supported the threshold of 0.2%.<ref name="pmid17146064">{{cite journal |author=Paltiel AD, Walensky RP, Schackman BR, ''et al'' |title=Expanded HIV screening in the United States: effect on clinical outcomes, HIV transmission, and costs |journal=Ann. Intern. Med. |volume=145 |issue=11 |pages=797–806 |year=2006 |pmid=17146064 |doi=|url=http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/full/145/11/797}}</ref>


== Human rights ==
== Human rights ==
Line 17: Line 18:


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]
 
[[Category:CZ Live]] [[Category:Health Sciences Workgroup]]

Latest revision as of 16:00, 24 August 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Clinical practice guidelines conflict on which populations should be screened for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 with the HIV test. The conflict is whether the underlying prevalence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus to justify screening is 1% or 0.2%.

The Centers for Disease Control states:[1]

"HIV screening is recommended for patients in all health-care settings after the patient is notified that testing will be performed unless the patient declines (opt-out screening)"
"Routine, rapid HIV testing is recommended for all adults except in settings where there is evidence that the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection is below 0.2%."

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force states:[2]

"strongly recommends that clinicians screen for HIV all adolescents and adults at increased risk for HIV infection". Regarding the definition of increased risk, the Task Force states "High-prevalence settings are defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) as those known to have a 1% or greater prevalence of infection "[2]

A subsequent cost-benefit analysis supported the threshold of 0.2%.[3]

Human rights

The UNAIDS/WHO policy statement on HIV Testing states that conditions under which people undergo HIV testing must be anchored in a human rights approach which pays due respect to ethical principles.[4] According to these principles, the conduct of HIV testing of individuals must be:

References

  1. Branson BM, Handsfield HH, Lampe MA, et al (2006). "Revised recommendations for HIV testing of adults, adolescents, and pregnant women in health-care settings". MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control 55 (RR-14): 1–17; quiz CE1–4. PMID 16988643[e]
  2. 2.0 2.1 US Preventive Services Task Force (2005). "Screening for HIV: recommendation statement". Ann. Intern. Med. 143 (1): 32–7. PMID 15998753[e]
  3. Paltiel AD, Walensky RP, Schackman BR, et al (2006). "Expanded HIV screening in the United States: effect on clinical outcomes, HIV transmission, and costs". Ann. Intern. Med. 145 (11): 797–806. PMID 17146064[e]
  4. UNAIDS/WHO policy statement on HIV Testing (PDF), accessed 5 Oct 2006.