imported>Joe Quick |
imported>Pat Palmer |
| (689 intermediate revisions by 52 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Archive box|auto=long}} | | {{Archive box|auto=long|box-width=30em}} |
| {{Usertime-text|Milt}}{{Template:Utc|-7}}<br><BR><BR><br> | | {{Usertime-text|Milt}}{{Template:Utc|-8 }}<br><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR> |
| | ==Milt== |
| | Milt was a great contributor to our project who invested a lot of his own knowledge and time in it; Citizendium is much poorer without him. He was highly trusted and respected, previously serving as the project's Treasurer and on the elected Management and Editorial Councils. However, we were a small part of a long life: Milt completed his degree in 1944, but his graduation was delayed while he saw action in Europe during the Second World War. Decades of experience in both chemical and environmental engineering followed, and he would become a well-published authority on various aspects of these fields, as recognized by his Fellowship of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. His daughter also tells me he liked to apply his engineering approach to everyday life by collecting recipes and carefully replicating dishes he'd enjoyed. Milt stood firm against pseudoscience and other nonsense, as we at Citizendium can attest, and was a strong proponent of the science and the facts. I am sure I speak for those who knew him here when I say that we will miss him. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] ([[User talk:John Stephenson|talk]]) 12:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC) |
| | :RIP Milt. He was a nice gent. [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] ([[User talk:Ro Thorpe|talk]]) 14:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC) |
| | :RIP Milt. [[User:JeromeDelacroix|Jérôme Delacroix]] ([[User talk:JeromeDelacroix|talk]]) 18:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC+1) |
| | :RIP Milt. You embodied the true spirit of Citizendium at its best.[[User:Roger A. Lohmann|Roger A. Lohmann]] ([[User talk:Roger A. Lohmann|talk]]) 04:11, 1 March 2015 (UTC) |
| | :RIP MIlt. As a collaborator and colleague, he will be missed. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] ([[User talk:Russell D. Jones|talk]]) 16:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| | Milt had an abundance of wisdom, passion and knowledge. He was with Citizendium from the early days, and embraced fully the spirit and idealism with which Citizendium was launched. He made an enormous contribution to the project. [[User:Gareth Leng|Gareth Leng]] ([[User talk:Gareth Leng|talk]]) 21:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| == I just archived the last batch of postings ==
| | I have missed Milt ever since he needed to leave the project, and I will always remember him fondly.[[User:Pat Palmer|Pat Palmer]] ([[User talk:Pat Palmer|talk]]) 01:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC) |
|
| |
|
| That is why this page looks rather empty at this moment. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 18:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
| | == Milt's productivity as chemical engineer == |
|
| |
|
| == an article of interest (maybe) ==
| | Let us temper our sadness in the passing of our esteemed colleague with a celebration of his achievements in his field of endeavor. Google Scholar has tabulated 111 articles he published between 1951 and 2005, with links to them and to all the articles that cited them. |
|
| |
|
| Would [http://www.microbialcellfactories.com/content/4/1/24 this article] be useful to you for any of the subjects you've been working on around here? It is licensed under a Creative Commons attribution license, which means that its contents may be reused as long as credit is given. I assume that goes for the photos and diagrams too, which might be of some use. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 14:18, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
| | See: [https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=kBHMSC4AAAAJ&hl=en&oi=sra MR Beychok] |
|
| |
|
| :Joe, that article would indeed be a good one for CZ and would work for inclusion in the Engineering and/or the Biology Workroups as well as the Chemical Engineering subgroup. However, it is a part of Chemical Engineering and/or Biochemical Engineering (see [[Chemical engineering]]) in which I have no no expertise or experience. I would be reluctant to just copy an article in a field I know practically nothing about.
| | [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] ([[User talk:Anthony.Sebastian|talk]]) 22:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC) |
| | |
| :Perhaps someone in the Biology Workgroup (like Chris Day, who is a Biology Editor) would be qualified to work on that article? [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 15:29, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Cryptography ==
| |
| Thank you for becoming an approving editor on [[brute force attack]]. There's been discussion and some change to the article since it was proposed. Please have a look, see if you can still support.
| |
| | |
| There's a [[User_talk:Howard_C._Berkowitz#Approvals.3F | long list]] of crypto articles that I think are near approval. One thing I'd really like is for someone who isn't in the field to look through [[Block_cipher#Principles_and_techniques]] and see if it makes sense. I think it should, but I don't really know. Would you have time for that? [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 08:53, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :Yes, I stiil support the nomination. See my comment on the article's talk page. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 14:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Thanks==
| |
| Hi Milt. Thanks for the response you posted on Larry's talk page. [[User:Hendra I. Nurdin|Hendra I. Nurdin]] 05:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ==Chemical Corps==
| |
| Sure. I think I created it at a time when someone was on a lower case rampage and I was tired of the changing. As the Brits say, capital idea.
| |
| | |
| Interesting thought: is that, as well as the chemical weapon/warfare material, appropriate to come under chemical engineering? [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :I have renamed it to Chemical Corps. As for it coming under the Chemical Engineering Subgroup, I think that is borderline okay for this one article. Maybe also borderline okay for the Chemistry Workgroup. In general, I think it and all related articles should be kept under the Military Workgroup. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 01:56, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Timing ==
| |
| | |
| Milton your clock is two hours behind. It seems that the CZ timing went completely crazy, I tried to edit the talk page of vapor pressure and it seems to have done somewhere in the past with the net effect that my edits are lost.--[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 17:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Approval ==
| |
| | |
| Hi Milton, I approved all three now. I considered the process smooth sailing, I hope you did too. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 23:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :It was smooth sailing indeed! Thanks very much. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 23:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :Hi Milt, I made a few changes to [[Specific heat ratio]]. Please take a look. --[[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] 10:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Vapor pressure approved, April 14th -- Congratulations ==
| |
| | |
| Hi, Milton, the [[Vapor pressure]] article has been approved and protected! Congrats! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 04:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Relative volatility approved, April 15th, Congratulations! ==
| |
| | |
| Hi, Milt, your article has been Approved -- you can see it at [[Relative volatility]]. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 16:29, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == adding a null space ==
| |
| | |
| Hmmm, I see that I guess I have to add the null space to the Draft version of the article in question rather than to the Waiting for Approvals page, which is where I tried doing it. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 16:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Congratulations again! ==
| |
| | |
| I've just Approved the [[Specific heat ratio]] article. But this time I'm not gonna waste any of my time trying to "jog" the flippin' Metadata -- let someone else do it, hehe! [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 18:26, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Thank you for unveiling the engineer's mind. ==
| |
| | |
| Smart nerds, those engineers, thank you for sharing this with me. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 23:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Gasoline nominated for approval ==
| |
| Milton, I nominated '''Gasoline''' for approval. Thanks for the rewording of the stability section. [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 17:35, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == pillars ==
| |
| | |
| [[Image:Mining2.gif|thumb|right|Updated figure showing pillars in an old vs modern mine]]
| |
| Milt, did you notice I upgraded the hand drawing. If it is still the old one empty your cache and then look at it. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 16:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| :If it is useful and you want some modifcations i can make changes for you. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 16:46, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ::Chris, I replaced the hand-drawn sketches with a much better diagram from the Kentucky Geological Survey (KGS). At the time that I did that, the old hand-drawn sketchs were still in the article. I did not realize that you had updated the sketches until you just notified me. In fact, the History page of the article still shows the old sketchs.
| |
| | |
| ::In any event, I think that the KGS diagram is probably all we need for that article. Thanks, [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 17:34, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :::No problem, i like the one you added. Note, I only upgraded the pillar one. i did not do the drift vs open vs shaft mining figure. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 17:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Malt, Milton, and God ==
| |
| | |
| Milton, truly, Housman had it right, "Malt does more than Milton can to justify God's ways to man." But he also wrote, "Ale, man, ale's the stuff to drink for fellows whom it hurts to think."
| |
| | |
| If you quote Housman, don´t you think you should write a CZ article on him? Even if it hurts to think. WP has one. [[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 02:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :Anthony, I didn't make that quote ... it was Hayford Pierce. I was just an innocent bystander who happened to be named Milton. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 02:30, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ::That happens to be my favorite poem. About the only one in the world, I guess, aside from other Housman poems, that I can understand. And that rhyme.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:32, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| == Do you know the new guy? ==
| |
| | |
| [[User:Richard_C_Mason]] <br>It seems like there would be a lot of overlap with what you two would be interested in working on. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 04:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| :Yes, I read his bio and I hope that he will be active. I'll keep my fingers crossed. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 05:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| ::Maybe you could invite him to contribute to an article you've worked on. Personal contact from peers or others with similar interests always seems best for encouraging new people to become active contributors. --[[User:Joe Quick|Joe Quick]] 20:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
| |
Archive 1,
Archive 2,
Archive 3,
Archive 4,
Archive 5,
Archive 6,
Archive 7,
Archive 8,
Archive 9,
Archive 10,
Archive 11,
Archive 12
Where Milt lives it is approximately: 08:18
Milt
Milt was a great contributor to our project who invested a lot of his own knowledge and time in it; Citizendium is much poorer without him. He was highly trusted and respected, previously serving as the project's Treasurer and on the elected Management and Editorial Councils. However, we were a small part of a long life: Milt completed his degree in 1944, but his graduation was delayed while he saw action in Europe during the Second World War. Decades of experience in both chemical and environmental engineering followed, and he would become a well-published authority on various aspects of these fields, as recognized by his Fellowship of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers. His daughter also tells me he liked to apply his engineering approach to everyday life by collecting recipes and carefully replicating dishes he'd enjoyed. Milt stood firm against pseudoscience and other nonsense, as we at Citizendium can attest, and was a strong proponent of the science and the facts. I am sure I speak for those who knew him here when I say that we will miss him. John Stephenson (talk) 12:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- RIP Milt. He was a nice gent. Ro Thorpe (talk) 14:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
- RIP Milt. Jérôme Delacroix (talk) 18:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC+1)
- RIP Milt. You embodied the true spirit of Citizendium at its best.Roger A. Lohmann (talk) 04:11, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- RIP MIlt. As a collaborator and colleague, he will be missed. Russell D. Jones (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Milt had an abundance of wisdom, passion and knowledge. He was with Citizendium from the early days, and embraced fully the spirit and idealism with which Citizendium was launched. He made an enormous contribution to the project. Gareth Leng (talk) 21:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
I have missed Milt ever since he needed to leave the project, and I will always remember him fondly.Pat Palmer (talk) 01:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Milt's productivity as chemical engineer
Let us temper our sadness in the passing of our esteemed colleague with a celebration of his achievements in his field of endeavor. Google Scholar has tabulated 111 articles he published between 1951 and 2005, with links to them and to all the articles that cited them.
See: MR Beychok
Anthony.Sebastian (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Where Milt lives it is approximately: 08:18