User:Milton Beychok/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:TVA Cooling Towers.jpg|right|thumb|200px|{{#ifexist:Template:TVA Cooling Towers.jpg/credit|{{TVA Cooling Towers.jpg/credit}}<br/>|}}Figure 1: Power plant counterflow cooling tower (note water vapor plumes)]]
{{AccountNotLive}}
__NOTOC__
[[File:Crude oil-fired power plant.jpg|thumb|right|225px|Industrial air pollution source]]
Atmospheric dispersion modeling is the mathematical simulation of how air pollutants disperse in the ambient atmosphere. It is performed with computer programs that solve the mathematical equations and algorithms which simulate the pollutant dispersion. The dispersion models are used to estimate or to predict the downwind concentration of air pollutants emitted from sources such as industrial plants, vehicular traffic or accidental chemical releases.


[[Image:Crossflow Cooling Tower.jpg|right|thumb|200px|{{#ifexist:Template:Crossflow Cooling Tower.jpg/credit|{{Crossflow Cooling Tower.jpg/credit}}<br/>|}}Figure 2: Process plant crossflow cooling tower (offstream for maintenance, no water vapor plume)]]
Such models are important to governmental agencies tasked with protecting and managing the ambient air quality. The models are typically employed to determine whether existing or proposed new industrial facilities are or will be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the United States or similar regulations in other nations. The models also serve to assist in the design of effective control strategies to reduce emissions of harmful air pollutants. During the late 1960's, the Air Pollution Control Office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) initiated research projects to develop models for use by urban and transportation planners.<ref>J.C. Fensterstock et al, "Reduction of air pollution potential through environmental planning", ''JAPCA'', Vol. 21, No. 7, 1971.</ref>


'''Industrial cooling towers''' are heat rejection systems used primarily to provide circulating cooling water to large industrial facilities. The circulating cooling water absorbs heat by cooling and/or condensing the hot process streams or by cooling hot rotating machinery and other hot equipment within the industrial facilities. The cooling towers  then reject that absorbed heat by transferring it to the [[atmosphere]].  
Air dispersion models are also used by emergency management personnel to develop emergency plans for accidental chemical releases. The results of dispersion modeling, using worst case accidental releases and meteorological conditions, can provide estimated locations of impacted areas and be used to determine appropriate protective actions. At industrial facilities in the United States, this type of consequence assessment or emergency planning is required under the Clean Air Act (CAA) codified in Part 68 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.


== How a cooling tower works ==
The dispersion models vary depending on the mathematics used to develop the model, but all require the input of data that may include:


Basically, a cooling tower intimately contacts a flow of warm water with a flow of ambient air which is not saturated with water vapor (i.e, air which contains less water vapor than it is capable of containing). That causes part of the warm water to evaporate and the air absorbs that evaporated water. The heat required to evaporate  part of the water is derived from the water itself and thus causes the water to cool. This process is known as [[evaporative cooling]].<ref>{{cite book|author=Larry Drbal, Kayla Westra and Pat Boston|title=Power Plant Engineering|edition=1st Edition |publisher=Springer|year=1996|id=ISBN 0-412-06401-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Robert H. Perry (deceased), Don W. Green and James O. Maloney (Editors)|title=[[Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook]]|edition=6th Edition|publisher=McGraw-Hill|year=1984 |id=ISBN 0-07-049479-7}}</ref> The net result is that the air leaving the tower is saturated with water vapor and the unevaporated water leaving the cooling tower has been cooled.
* Meteorological conditions such as wind speed and direction, the amount of atmospheric turbulence (as characterized by what is called the "stability class"), the ambient air temperature, the height to the bottom of any inversion aloft that may be present, cloud cover and solar radiation.
* The emission parameters such the type of source (i.e., point, line or area), the mass flow rate, the source location and height, the source exit velocity, and the source exit temperature.
* Terrain elevations at the source location and at receptor locations, such as nearby homes, schools, businesses and hospitals.
* The location, height and width of any obstructions (such as buildings or other structures) in the path of the emitted gaseous plume as well as the terrain surface roughness (which may be characterized by the more generic parameters "rural" or "city" terrain).


An evaporative cooling tower is referred to as a ''wet cooling tower'' or simply a ''cooling tower''. Such towers can cool water to a temperature that approaches the [[wet-bulb temperature]] of the ambient air. The average ambient air wet-bulb temperature chosen as the design basis essentially determines the size of the cooling tower, and the size of a cooling tower is inversely proportional to the design wet-bulb temperature.  
Many of the modern, advanced dispersion modeling programs include a pre-processor module for the input of meteorological and other data, and many also include a post-processor module for graphing the output data and/or plotting the area impacted by the air pollutants on maps. The plots of areas impacted usually include isopleths showing areas of pollutant concentrations that define areas of the highest health risk. The isopleths plots are useful in determining protective actions for the public and first responders.


To achieve better performance (more cooling), a media called ''fill'' is used to increase the contact surface area between the air and water flows. ''Splash fill'' consists of material placed to interrupt the water flow causing splashing. ''Film fill'' is composed of thin sheets of material upon which the water flows.<ref>[http://spxcooling.com/en/profiles/cooling-tower-fill/ Cooling tower fill]</ref> Most fill in modern cooling towers is plastic material.
The atmospheric dispersion models are also known as atmospheric diffusion models, air dispersion models, air quality models, and air pollution dispersion models.


==Applications==
==Atmospheric layers==


The primary use of large, industrial cooling towers is to remove the heat absorbed in the circulating cooling water systems used in industrial facilities such as [[Petroleum refining processes|petroleum refineries]],  [[petrochemical]] and [[chemical plant]]s, [[Natural gas processing|natural gas processing plants]] and [[power plants]].
Discussion of the layers in the Earth's atmosphere is needed to understand where airborne pollutants disperse in the atmosphere. The layer closest to the Earth's surface is known as the ''troposphere''. It extends from sea-level up to a height of about 18 km and contains about 80 percent of the mass of the overall atmosphere. The ''stratosphere'' is the next layer and extends from 18 km up to about 50 km. The third layer is the ''mesosphere'' which extends from 50 km up to about 80 km. There are other layers above 80 km, but they are insignificant with respect to atmospheric dispersion modeling.


The circulation rate of cooling water in a typical 700 [[MW]] coal-fired power plant with a cooling tower amounts to about 71,600 [[cubic metre]]s an hour (315,000 [[U.S. gallon]]s per minute)<ref> [http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/presentations/maulbetsch.pdf  Cooling System Retrofit Costs] EPA Workshop on Cooling Water Intake Technologies, John Maulbetsch and Kent Zammit, May 2003</ref> and the system requires a supply water make-up rate of perhaps 5 percent (i.e., 3,600 cubic metres an hour).
The lowest part of the troposphere is called the ''atmospheric boundary layer (ABL)'' or the ''planetary boundary layer (PBL)'' and extends from the Earth's surface up to about 1.5 to 2.0 km in height. The air temperature of the atmospheric boundary layer decreases with increasing altitude until it reaches what is called the ''inversion layer'' (where the temperature increases with increasing altitude) that caps the atmospheric boundary layer. The upper part of the troposphere (i.e., above the inversion layer) is called the ''free troposphere'' and it extends up to the 18 km height of the troposphere.


If that same plant had no cooling tower and used once-through cooling water, it would require  about 100,000 cubic metres an hour <ref>[http://204.154.137.14/technologies/coalpower/ewr/pubs/IEP_Power_Plant_Water_R&D_Final_1.pdf United States Department of Energy] (Office of Fossil Energy's Power Plant Water Management R&D Program)</ref> and that amount of water would have to be continuously returned to the ocean, lake or river from which it was obtained and continuously re-supplied to the plant. Furthermore, discharging large amounts of hot water may raise the temperature of the receiving river or lake to an unacceptable level for the local ecosystem. A cooling tower serves to dissipate the heat into the atmosphere instead and wind and air diffusion spreads the heat over a much larger area than hot water can distribute heat in a body of water.
The ABL is the most important layer with respect to the emission, transport and dispersion of airborne pollutants. The part of the ABL between the Earth's surface and the bottom of the inversion layer is known as the ''mixing layer''. Almost all of the airborne pollutants emitted into the ambient atmosphere are transported and dispersed within the mixing layer. Some of the emissions penetrate the inversion layer and enter the free troposphere above the ABL.


Some coal-fired and nuclear power plants located in coastal areas do make use of once-through ocean water. But even there, the offshore discharge water outlet requires very careful design to avoid environmental problems.
In summary, the layers of the Earth's atmosphere from the surface of the ground upwards are: the ABL made up of the mixing layer capped by the inversion layer; the free troposphere; the stratosphere; the mesosphere and others. Many atmospheric dispersion models are referred to as ''boundary layer models'' because they mainly model air pollutant dispersion within the ABL. To avoid confusion, models referred to as ''mesoscale models'' have dispersion modeling capabilities that can extend horizontally as much as  a few hundred kilometres. It does not mean that they model dispersion in the mesosphere.


Petroleum refineries also have very large cooling tower systems. A typical large refinery processing 40,000 [[metric tonne]]s of crude oil per day (300,000 [[Barrel (unit)|barrels]] per day) circulates about 80,000 cubic metres of water per hour through its cooling tower system.
==Gaussian air pollutant dispersion equation==


This article is devoted to the large-scale cooling towers used in industrial facilities. However, much smaller cooling towers of various types are used in the air-conditioning of office buildings, hotels, sports arenas, food storage facilities and many other commercial establishments.
The technical literature on air pollution dispersion is quite extensive and dates back to the 1930s and earlier. One of the early air pollutant plume dispersion equations was derived by Bosanquet and Pearson.<ref>C.H. Bosanquet and J.L. Pearson, "The spread of smoke and gases from chimneys", ''Trans. Faraday Soc.'', 32:1249, 1936.</ref> Their equation did not assume Gaussian distribution nor did it include the effect of ground reflection of the pollutant plume.


== Cooling tower operational variables ==
Sir Graham Sutton derived an air pollutant plume dispersion equation in 1947<ref>O.G. Sutton, "The problem of diffusion in the lower atmosphere", ''QJRMS'', 73:257, 1947.</ref><ref>O.G. Sutton, "The theoretical distribution of airborne pollution from factory chimneys", ''QJRMS'', 73:426, 1947.</ref> which did include the assumption of Gaussian distribution for the vertical and crosswind dispersion of the plume and also included the effect of ground reflection of the plume.


Quantitatively, the material balance around a wet, evaporative  cooling tower system is governed by the operational variables of makeup flow rate, [[evaporation]] and drift losses, blowdown rate, and the concentration cycles:<ref name=Beychok>{{cite book | author=Beychok, Milton R. | title=[[Aqueous Wastes from Petroleum and Petrochemical Plants]] |edition=1st Edition | publisher=John Wiley and Sons | year=1967|id=[[Library of Congress Control Number|LCCN 67019834]]}} (available in many university libraries)</ref>
Under the stimulus provided by the advent of stringent environmental control regulations, there was an immense growth in the use of air pollutant plume dispersion calculations between the late 1960s and today. A great many computer programs for calculating the dispersion of air pollutant emissions were developed during that period of time and they were commonly called "air dispersion models". The basis for most of those models was the '''Complete Equation For Gaussian Dispersion Modeling Of Continuous, Buoyant Air Pollution Plumes''' shown below:<ref name=Beychok>{{cite book|author=M.R. Beychok|title=Fundamentals Of Stack Gas Dispersion|edition=4th Edition| publisher=author-published|year=2005|isbn=0-9644588-0-2}}.</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=D. B. Turner| title=Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates: an introduction to dispersion modeling| edition=2nd Edition |publisher=CRC Press|year=1994|isbn=1-56670-023-X}}.</ref>


[[Image:Cooling Tower.png|left|thumb|249px|{{#ifexist:Template:Cooling Tower.png/credit|{{Cooling Tower.png/credit}}<br/>|}}Figure 3: Fan-induced draft counterflow cooling tower]]


Referring to Figure 3, water pumped from the cooling tower basin is the cooling water routed through the process stream cooling and condensing [[heat exchanger]]s in an industrial facility. The cool water absorbs heat from the hot process streams which need to be cooled or condensed, and the absorbed heat warms the circulating water (C).
<math>C = \frac{\;Q}{u}\cdot\frac{\;f}{\sigma_y\sqrt{2\pi}}\;\cdot\frac{\;g_1 + g_2 + g_3}{\sigma_z\sqrt{2\pi}}</math>


The warm water returns to the top of the cooling tower and trickles downward over the fill material inside the tower. As it trickles down, it contacts the fan-induced upward flow of ambient air. That contact causes a portion of the water (E) to evaporate into water vapor that exits the tower as part of the water saturated air. A small amount of the water also exits as entrained liquid water called ''drift losses'' (D). The heat required to evaporate  the water is derived from the water itself, which cools the water back to the original basin water temperature and the water is then ready to recirculate.
{| border="0" cellpadding="2"
 
|-
The evaporated water leaves its dissolved [[salt]]s behind in the bulk of the water which has not been evaporated, thus raising the salt concentration in the circulating cooling water. To prevent the salt concentration of the water from becoming too high, a portion of the water, referred to as ''blowdown'' (B) is drawn off for disposal. Fresh water makeup (M) is supplied to the tower basin to compensate for the loss of evaporated water, the drift loss water and the blowdown water.
|align=right|where:
 
|&nbsp;
Defining the various terms:
|-
 
!align=right|<math>f</math>  
{| border="0" cellpadding="2"
|align=left|= crosswind dispersion parameter
|-
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= <math>\exp\;[-\,y^2/\,(2\;\sigma_y^2\;)\;]</math>
|-
!align=right|<math>g</math>
|align=left|= vertical dispersion parameter = <math>\,g_1 + g_2 + g_3</math>
|-
!align=right|<math>g_1</math>
|align=left|= vertical dispersion with no reflections
|-
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= <math>\; \exp\;[-\,(z - H)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]</math>
|-
!align=right|<math>g_2</math>
|align=left|= vertical dispersion for reflection from the ground
|-
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= <math>\;\exp\;[-\,(z + H)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]</math>
|-
!align=right|<math>g_3</math>
|align=left|= vertical dispersion for reflection from an inversion aloft
|-
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= <math>\sum_{m=1}^\infty\;\big\{\exp\;[-\,(z - H - 2mL)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]</math>
|-
|-
|align=right| '''M'''
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= Make-up water in m³/hr
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <math>+\, \exp\;[-\,(z + H + 2mL)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]</math>
|-
|-
|align=right| '''C'''
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= Circulating water in m³/hr
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <math>+\, \exp\;[-\,(z + H - 2mL)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]</math>
|-
|-
|align=right| '''B'''
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= Blowdown water in m³/hr
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; <math>+\, \exp\;[-\,(z - H + 2mL)^2/\,(2\;\sigma_z^2\;)\;]\big\}</math>
|-
|-
|align=right| '''E'''
!align=right|<math>C</math>
|align=left|= Evaporated water in m³/hr
|align=left|= concentration of emissions, in g/, at any receptor located:
|-
|-
|align=right| '''D'''
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= Drift loss of water in m³/hr
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; x meters downwind from the emission source point
|-
|-
|align=right| '''X'''
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= Concentration in [[ppmw]] (of any completely soluble salts … usually [[chlorides]])
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; y meters crosswind from the emission plume centerline
|-
|-
|align=right| '''X<sub>M</sub>'''
!align=right|&nbsp;
|align=left|= Concentration of chlorides in make-up water (M), in ppmw
|align=left|&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; z meters above ground level
|-
|-
|align=right| '''X<sub>C</sub>'''
!align=right|<math>Q</math>
|align=left|= Concentration of chlorides in circulating water (C), in ppmw
|align=left|= source pollutant emission rate, in g/s
|-
|-
|align=right| '''Cycles'''
!align=right|<math>u</math>
|align=left|= Cycles of concentration = X<sub>C</sub> / X<sub>M</sub> (dimensionless)
|align=left|= horizontal wind velocity along the plume centerline, m/s
|-
|-
|align=right| '''ppmw'''
!align=right|<math>H</math>
|align=left|= parts per million by weight
|align=left|= height of emission plume centerline above ground level, in m
|}
A water balance around the entire system is:
 
:M = E + D + B
 
Since the evaporated water (E) has no salts, a chloride balance around the system is:
 
:M (X<sub>M</sub>) = D (X<sub>C</sub>) + B (X<sub>C</sub>) = X<sub>C</sub> (D + B)
 
and, therefore:<ref name=Beychok/>
 
:'''X<sub>C</sub> / X<sub>M</sub> = Cycles of concentration = M ÷ (D + B) = M ÷ (M – E) = 1 + [E ÷ (B + W)]'''
 
From a simplified heat balance around the cooling tower:<ref name=Beychok/>
 
:'''E = C · ΔT · c<sub>p</sub> ÷ H<sub>V</sub>'''
 
{| border="0" cellpadding="2"
|-
|-
|align=right|where:
!align=right|<math>\sigma_z</math>
|&nbsp;
|align=left|= vertical standard deviation of the emission distribution, in m
|-
|-
|align=right| '''H<sub>V</sub>'''
!align=right|<math>\sigma_y</math>
|align=left|= latent heat of vaporization of water = ca. 2260 kJ / kg
|align=left|= horizontal standard deviation of the emission distribution, in m
|-
|-
|align=right| '''ΔT'''
!align=right|<math>L</math>
|align=left|= water temperature difference from tower top to tower bottom, in °C
|align=left|= height from ground level to bottom of the inversion aloft, in m
|-
|-
|align=right| '''c<sub>p</sub>'''
!align=right|<math>\exp</math>
|align=left|= specific heat of water = ca. 4.184 kJ / (kg<math>\cdot</math>°C)
|align=left|= the exponential function
|}
|}


Modern cooling towers have demisters known as ''drift eliminators'' to reduce the amount of drift losses (D) from large-scale industrial cooling towers. However, some older cooling towers have no drift eliminators. In the absence of manufacturer's data, drift losses may be assumed to be:
The above equation not only includes upward reflection from the ground, it also includes downward reflection from the bottom of any inversion lid present in the atmosphere.


:'''D''' = 0.3 to 1.0 percent of C for a natural draft cooling tower without drift eliminators
The sum of the four exponential terms in <math>g_3</math> converges to a final value quite rapidly. For most cases, the summation of the series with '''''m''''' = 1, '''''m''''' = 2 and '''''m''''' = 3 will provide an adequate solution.
:'''D''' = 0.1 to 0.3 percent of C for an induced draft cooling tower without drift eliminators
:'''D''' = about 0.005 percent of C (or less) if the cooling tower has drift eliminators


Cycles of concentration represents the accumulation of dissolved minerals in the recirculating cooling water. Blowdown of a portion of the circulating water (from the tower basin) is the principal means of controlling the buildup of these minerals.  
<math>\sigma_z</math> and <math>\sigma_y</math> are functions of the atmospheric stability class (i.e., a measure of the turbulence in the ambient atmosphere) and of the downwind distance to the receptor. The two most important variables affecting the degree of pollutant emission dispersion obtained are the height of the emission source point and the degree of atmospheric turbulence. The more turbulence, the better the degree of dispersion.


The chemistry of the makeup water including the amount of dissolved minerals can vary widely. Makeup waters low in dissolved minerals such as those from surface water supplies (lakes, rivers etc.) tend to be aggressive to metals (corrosive). Makeup waters from ground water supplies (wells) are usually higher in minerals and tend to be scaling (deposit minerals).  
Whereas older models rely on stability classes for the determination of <math>\sigma_y</math> and <math>\sigma_z</math>, more recent models increasingly rely on Monin-Obukhov similarity theory to derive these parameters.


As the cycles of concentration increase, the water may not be able to hold the minerals in solution. When the [[solubility]] of these minerals have been exceeded they can [[precipitate]] out as mineral solids and cause fouling and heat exchange problems in the cooling tower or the [[heat exchangers]]. The temperatures of the recirculating water, piping and heat exchange surfaces determine if and where minerals will precipitate from the recirculating water. Often a professional water treatment consultant will evaluate the makeup water and the operating conditions of the cooling tower and recommend an appropriate range for the cycles of concentration. The use of water treatment chemicals, pretreatment such as [[water softening]], [[pH]] adjustment, and other techniques can affect the acceptable range of cycles of concentration.
==Briggs plume rise equations==
                                     
Concentration cycles in the majority of cooling towers usually range from 3 to 7. In the United States the majority of water supplies are well waters and have significant levels of dissolved solids. On the other hand one of the largest water supplies, New York City, has a surface supply quite low in minerals and cooling towers in that city are often allowed to concentrate to 7 or more cycles of concentration.


Besides treating the circulating cooling water in large industrial cooling tower systems to minimize [[scaling]] and [[fouling]], the water should be [[Filter (water)|filtered]] and also be dosed with [[biocide]]s and [[algaecide]]s to prevent growths that could interfere with the continuous flow of the water.<ref name=Beychok/> Corrosion inhibitors may also be used, but caution should be taken to meet local environmental regulations as some inhibitors use [[chromate]]s.
The Gaussian air pollutant dispersion equation (discussed above) requires the input of ''H'' which is the pollutant plume's centerline height above ground level. ''H'' is the sum of ''H''<sub>s</sub> (the actual physical height of the pollutant plume's emission source point) plus Δ''H'' (the plume rise due the plume's buoyancy).


== Types of cooling towers ==
[[File:Gaussian Plume.png|thumb|right|333px|Visualization of a buoyant Gaussian air pollutant dispersion plume]]


Wet cooling towers may be categorized by their method of generating air flow, by their air-to-water flow arrangement and by their physical shape.
To determine Δ''H'', many if not most of the air dispersion models developed between the late 1960s and the early 2000s used what are known as "the Briggs equations." G.A. Briggs first published his plume rise observations and comparisons in 1965.<ref>G.A. Briggs, "A plume rise model compared with observations", ''JAPCA'', 15:433–438, 1965.</ref> In 1968, at a symposium sponsored by CONCAWE (a Dutch organization), he compared many of the plume rise models then available in the literature.<ref>G.A. Briggs, "CONCAWE meeting: discussion of the comparative consequences of different plume rise formulas", ''Atmos. Envir.'', 2:228–232, 1968.</ref> In that same year, Briggs also wrote the section of the publication edited by Slade<ref>D.H. Slade (editor), "Meteorology and atomic energy 1968", Air Resources Laboratory, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1968.</ref> dealing with the comparative analyses of plume rise models.  That was followed in 1969 by his classical critical review of the entire plume rise literature,<ref>G.A. Briggs, "Plume Rise", ''USAEC Critical Review Series'', 1969.</ref> in which he proposed a set of plume rise equations which have become widely known as "the Briggs equations".  Subsequently, Briggs modified his 1969 plume rise equations in 1971 and in 1972.<ref>G.A. Briggs, "Some recent analyses of plume rise observation", ''Proc. Second Internat'l. Clean Air Congress'', Academic Press, New York, 1971.</ref><ref>G.A. Briggs, "Discussion: chimney plumes in neutral and stable surroundings", ''Atmos. Envir.'', 6:507–510, 1972.</ref>


=== Air flow generation methods ===
Briggs divided air pollution plumes into these four general categories:
* Cold jet plumes in calm ambient air conditions
* Cold jet plumes in windy ambient air conditions
* Hot, buoyant plumes in calm ambient air conditions
* Hot, buoyant plumes in windy ambient air conditions


With respect to generating air flow through the tower, there are three types of cooling towers:
Briggs considered the trajectory of cold jet plumes to be dominated by their initial velocity momentum, and the trajectory of hot, buoyant plumes to be dominated by their buoyant momentum to the extent that their initial velocity momentum was relatively unimportant.  Although Briggs proposed plume rise equations for each of the above plume categories, '''''it is important to emphasize that "the Briggs equations" which become widely used are those that he proposed for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes'''''.


*[[Flue gas stack#Flue gas stack draft (or draught)|''Natural draft'']],<ref name=Mungan>{{cite book|author=I. Mungan and U. Wittek (Editors)|title=Natural Draught Cooling Towers|edition=|publisher=Taylor & Francis Group|year=2004|id=ISBN 90-5809-642-4}}></ref>which uses the so-called ''stack effect'' of a tall [[flue gas stack]] or other enclosed structure where the warm inside air ''naturally'' rises due to the density differential between that inside warm air and the cooler outside air. Thus, the buoyancy of the inside air relative to the outside air induces a flow of air through the cooling tower.
In general, Briggs's equations for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes are based on observations and data involving plumes from typical combustion sources such as the flue gas stacks from steam-generating boilers burning fossil fuels in large power plants.  Therefore the stack exit velocities were probably in the range of 20 to 100 ft/s (6 to 30 m/s) with exit temperatures ranging from 250 to 500 °F (120 to 260 °C).


*''Mechanical draft'', which uses motor-driven fans to either force or draw air through the tower.
A logic diagram for using the Briggs equations<ref name=Beychok/> to obtain the plume rise trajectory of bent-over buoyant plumes is presented below:
**''Induced draft'', which uses a fan at the air exit from the cooling tower to pull or draw air through the tower. This produces low entering and high exiting air velocities, reducing the possibility  of the exit air  recirculating back into the air intake.
[[Image:BriggsLogic.png|none]]
**''Forced draft'': which uses a fan at the air intake to the cooling tower to push or force air through the tower. This produces high entering and low exiting air velocities. The low exiting velocity is more susceptible to recirculation. Also, a fan on the cold air intake more susceptible to complications due to freezing conditions than is a fan on the warm air exit.
:{| border="0" cellpadding="2"
|-
|align=right|where:
|&nbsp;
|-
!align=right| Δh
|align=left|= plume rise, in m
|-
!align=right| F<sup>&nbsp;</sup> <!-- The HTML is needed to line up characters. Do not remove.-->
|align=left|= buoyancy factor, in m<sup>4</sup>s<sup>−3</sup>
|-
!align=right| x
|align=left|= downwind distance from plume source, in m
|-
!align=right| x<sub>f</sub>
|align=left|= downwind distance from plume source to point of maximum plume rise, in m
|-
!align=right| u
|align=left|= windspeed at actual stack height, in m/s
|-
!align=right| s<sup>&nbsp;</sup> <!-- The HTML is needed to line up characters. Do not remove.-->
|align=left|= stability parameter, in s<sup>−2</sup>
|}
The above parameters used in the Briggs' equations are discussed in Beychok's book.<ref name=Beychok/>


[[Image:Crossflow Cooling Tower.png|right|thumb|194px|{{#ifexist:Template:Crossflow Cooling Tower.png/credit|{{Crossflow Cooling Tower.png/credit}}<br/>|}}Figure 4: Fan-induced draft crossflow cooling tower]]
==References==
 
{{reflist}}
=== Air-to-water flow arrangements ===
 
*''Counterflow'' is an arrangement, as in Figure 3, in which the air flows upward through the fill and the water flows downward through the fill. Figure 1 is a photograph of a fan-induced draft, counterflow cooling tower in a  power plant operated by the [[Tennessee Valley Authority]] (TVA).
 
*''Crossflow'' is an arrangement, as in Figure 4, in which the air flow is directed perpendicular to the water flow. Figure 2 is a photograph of a fan-induced draft, cross-flow cooling tower. Air flow enters one or more vertical faces of the cooling tower and flows horizontally through the fill material. Water flows downward (perpendicular to the air) through the fill.
 
Both crossflow and counterflow designs can be used in natural draft and mechanical draft cooling towers.


=== Physical shapes ===
== Further reading==
[[Image:Power Plant Hyperboloid Cooling Towers.jpg|right|thumb|200px|{{#ifexist:Template:Power Plant Hyperboloid Cooling Towers.jpg/credit|{{Power Plant Hyperboloid Cooling Towers.jpg/credit}}<br/>|}}Figure 5: Power plant hyperboloid cooling towers (note water vapor plumes)]]


Cooling towers may have a rectangular box shape as depicted in Figures 1 and 3. Most petroleum refineries, natural gas processing plants, and petrochemical or chemical plants use rectangular box shaped cooling towers.
*{{cite book | author=M.R. Beychok| title=Fundamentals Of Stack Gas Dispersion | edition=4th Edition | publisher=author-published | year=2005 | isbn=0-9644588-0-2}}


Cooling towers may also have a hyperboloid shape as shown in Figure 5.<ref name=Mungan/> [[Hyperboloid]] (or hyperbolic) cooling towers have become essentially the design standard for natural-draft cooling towers because of their structural strength and minimum usage of material. The air-to-water flow arrangement within  hyperboloid cooling towers may be counterflow or crossflow and the air flow may be fan assisted, just as in the rectangular box shaped cooling towers. The hyperbolic form is popularly associated with nuclear power plants. However, this association is misleading, as they are often used at large coal-fired power plants as well.
*{{cite book | author=K.B. Schnelle and P.R. Dey| title=Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling Compliance Guide  | edition=1st Edition| publisher=McGraw-Hill Professional | year=1999 | isbn=0-07-058059-6}}


Large rectangular box cooling towers can be up to 40 [[metres]] tall and 175 metres long. The hyperboloid cooling towers can be up to 200 metres tall. The cooling tower at the coal-fired power plant in [[Niederaussen]], [[Germany]] is 200 metres high and the water basin at the bottom of the tower has a diameter of 141 metres. It was said to be the largest cooling tower in the world as of 2004.<ref name=Mungan/>
*{{cite book | author=D.B. Turner| title=Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates: An Introduction to Dispersion Modeling | edition=2nd Edition | publisher=CRC Press | year=1994 | isbn=1-56670-023-X}}


==Some commonly used terms in the cooling tower industry==
*{{cite book | author= S.P. Arya| title=Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion | edition=1st Edition | publisher=Oxford University Press | year=1998 | isbn=0-19-507398-3}}


*Drift - Water droplets that are carried out of the cooling tower with the exhaust air. Drift droplets have the same concentration of impurities as the water entering the tower. The drift rate is typically reduced by devices, called drift eliminators, through which the air must travel after leaving the fill and water spray zones of the tower.
*{{cite book | author=R. Barrat| title=Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling | edition=1st Edition | publisher=Earthscan Publications | year=2001 | isbn=1-85383-642-7}}


*Plume - The stream of saturated exhaust air leaving the cooling tower. The plume is visible when the water vapor it contains condenses in contact with cooler ambient air. Under certain conditions, a cooling tower plume may present fogging or icing hazards to its surroundings.  
*{{cite book | author=S.R. Hanna and R.E. Britter| title=Wind Flow and Vapor Cloud Dispersion at Industrial and Urban Sites  | edition=1st Edition | publisher=Wiley-American Institute of Chemical Engineers | year=2002 | isbn=0-8169-0863-X}}


*Blow-down - The portion of the circulating water flow that is removed in order to maintain the amount of [[Total dissolved solids|dissolved solids]] and other impurities at an acceptable level.
*{{cite book | author=P. Zannetti| title=Air pollution modeling : theories, computational methods, and available software | edition= | publisher= Van Nostrand Reinhold | year=1990 | isbn=0-442-30805-1 }}
 
*Leaching - The loss of wood preservative chemicals by the washing action of the water flowing through a wood cooling tower structure.
 
*Approach - The approach is the difference in temperature between the cooled-water temperature and the wet-bulb temperature of the ambient air entering the tower. Since the cooling towers are based on the principles of evaporative cooling, the maximum cooling tower efficiency depends on the wet bulb temperature of the air.
 
*Range - The range is the temperature difference between the water inlet and water exit.
 
*Fill - Inside the tower, fills are added to increase the contact surface between the air and the water. Thus, they provide better heat transfer. The efficiency of the tower also depends on them.
 
== Legionnaires' disease ==
 
[[Legionellosis]] (referred to [[Legionnaires' disease]]) is a dangerous infectious disease caused by bacteria belonging to the genus [[Legionella]]. In many outbreaks of that disease, air-conditioning cooling towers have been found to be the source of the disease-causing bacteria.
 
Many governmental agencies, cooling tower manufacturers and industrial trade organizations have developed design and maintenance guidelines for preventing or controlling the growth of Legionella in cooling towers.<ref>[http://spxcooling.com/pdf/guide12.pdf SPX (Marley) Cooling Technologies] - ASHRAE Guideline 12-2000, Minimizing the Risk of Legionellosis</ref><ref>[http://www.ewgli.org/data/european_guidelines/eg_supplement1a.pdf EWGLI] - (European) Technical Guidelines for the Control and Prevention of Legionella in Water Systems</ref><ref>[http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqp/pdf/guidelines/Enviro_guide_03.pdf  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] - Procedure for Cleaning Cooling Towers and Related Equipment (pages 239 and 240)</ref><ref>
[http://www.cti.org/downloads/legion_2000.pdf Cooling Technology Institute] - Best Practices for Control of Legionella</ref>
 
==References==
{{reflist}}

Latest revision as of 03:25, 22 November 2023


The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.


Industrial air pollution source

Atmospheric dispersion modeling is the mathematical simulation of how air pollutants disperse in the ambient atmosphere. It is performed with computer programs that solve the mathematical equations and algorithms which simulate the pollutant dispersion. The dispersion models are used to estimate or to predict the downwind concentration of air pollutants emitted from sources such as industrial plants, vehicular traffic or accidental chemical releases.

Such models are important to governmental agencies tasked with protecting and managing the ambient air quality. The models are typically employed to determine whether existing or proposed new industrial facilities are or will be in compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the United States or similar regulations in other nations. The models also serve to assist in the design of effective control strategies to reduce emissions of harmful air pollutants. During the late 1960's, the Air Pollution Control Office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) initiated research projects to develop models for use by urban and transportation planners.[1]

Air dispersion models are also used by emergency management personnel to develop emergency plans for accidental chemical releases. The results of dispersion modeling, using worst case accidental releases and meteorological conditions, can provide estimated locations of impacted areas and be used to determine appropriate protective actions. At industrial facilities in the United States, this type of consequence assessment or emergency planning is required under the Clean Air Act (CAA) codified in Part 68 of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

The dispersion models vary depending on the mathematics used to develop the model, but all require the input of data that may include:

  • Meteorological conditions such as wind speed and direction, the amount of atmospheric turbulence (as characterized by what is called the "stability class"), the ambient air temperature, the height to the bottom of any inversion aloft that may be present, cloud cover and solar radiation.
  • The emission parameters such the type of source (i.e., point, line or area), the mass flow rate, the source location and height, the source exit velocity, and the source exit temperature.
  • Terrain elevations at the source location and at receptor locations, such as nearby homes, schools, businesses and hospitals.
  • The location, height and width of any obstructions (such as buildings or other structures) in the path of the emitted gaseous plume as well as the terrain surface roughness (which may be characterized by the more generic parameters "rural" or "city" terrain).

Many of the modern, advanced dispersion modeling programs include a pre-processor module for the input of meteorological and other data, and many also include a post-processor module for graphing the output data and/or plotting the area impacted by the air pollutants on maps. The plots of areas impacted usually include isopleths showing areas of pollutant concentrations that define areas of the highest health risk. The isopleths plots are useful in determining protective actions for the public and first responders.

The atmospheric dispersion models are also known as atmospheric diffusion models, air dispersion models, air quality models, and air pollution dispersion models.

Atmospheric layers

Discussion of the layers in the Earth's atmosphere is needed to understand where airborne pollutants disperse in the atmosphere. The layer closest to the Earth's surface is known as the troposphere. It extends from sea-level up to a height of about 18 km and contains about 80 percent of the mass of the overall atmosphere. The stratosphere is the next layer and extends from 18 km up to about 50 km. The third layer is the mesosphere which extends from 50 km up to about 80 km. There are other layers above 80 km, but they are insignificant with respect to atmospheric dispersion modeling.

The lowest part of the troposphere is called the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) or the planetary boundary layer (PBL) and extends from the Earth's surface up to about 1.5 to 2.0 km in height. The air temperature of the atmospheric boundary layer decreases with increasing altitude until it reaches what is called the inversion layer (where the temperature increases with increasing altitude) that caps the atmospheric boundary layer. The upper part of the troposphere (i.e., above the inversion layer) is called the free troposphere and it extends up to the 18 km height of the troposphere.

The ABL is the most important layer with respect to the emission, transport and dispersion of airborne pollutants. The part of the ABL between the Earth's surface and the bottom of the inversion layer is known as the mixing layer. Almost all of the airborne pollutants emitted into the ambient atmosphere are transported and dispersed within the mixing layer. Some of the emissions penetrate the inversion layer and enter the free troposphere above the ABL.

In summary, the layers of the Earth's atmosphere from the surface of the ground upwards are: the ABL made up of the mixing layer capped by the inversion layer; the free troposphere; the stratosphere; the mesosphere and others. Many atmospheric dispersion models are referred to as boundary layer models because they mainly model air pollutant dispersion within the ABL. To avoid confusion, models referred to as mesoscale models have dispersion modeling capabilities that can extend horizontally as much as a few hundred kilometres. It does not mean that they model dispersion in the mesosphere.

Gaussian air pollutant dispersion equation

The technical literature on air pollution dispersion is quite extensive and dates back to the 1930s and earlier. One of the early air pollutant plume dispersion equations was derived by Bosanquet and Pearson.[2] Their equation did not assume Gaussian distribution nor did it include the effect of ground reflection of the pollutant plume.

Sir Graham Sutton derived an air pollutant plume dispersion equation in 1947[3][4] which did include the assumption of Gaussian distribution for the vertical and crosswind dispersion of the plume and also included the effect of ground reflection of the plume.

Under the stimulus provided by the advent of stringent environmental control regulations, there was an immense growth in the use of air pollutant plume dispersion calculations between the late 1960s and today. A great many computer programs for calculating the dispersion of air pollutant emissions were developed during that period of time and they were commonly called "air dispersion models". The basis for most of those models was the Complete Equation For Gaussian Dispersion Modeling Of Continuous, Buoyant Air Pollution Plumes shown below:[5][6]


where:  
= crosswind dispersion parameter
  =
= vertical dispersion parameter =
= vertical dispersion with no reflections
  =
= vertical dispersion for reflection from the ground
  =
= vertical dispersion for reflection from an inversion aloft
  =
           
           
           
= concentration of emissions, in g/m³, at any receptor located:
            x meters downwind from the emission source point
            y meters crosswind from the emission plume centerline
            z meters above ground level
= source pollutant emission rate, in g/s
= horizontal wind velocity along the plume centerline, m/s
= height of emission plume centerline above ground level, in m
= vertical standard deviation of the emission distribution, in m
= horizontal standard deviation of the emission distribution, in m
= height from ground level to bottom of the inversion aloft, in m
= the exponential function

The above equation not only includes upward reflection from the ground, it also includes downward reflection from the bottom of any inversion lid present in the atmosphere.

The sum of the four exponential terms in converges to a final value quite rapidly. For most cases, the summation of the series with m = 1, m = 2 and m = 3 will provide an adequate solution.

and are functions of the atmospheric stability class (i.e., a measure of the turbulence in the ambient atmosphere) and of the downwind distance to the receptor. The two most important variables affecting the degree of pollutant emission dispersion obtained are the height of the emission source point and the degree of atmospheric turbulence. The more turbulence, the better the degree of dispersion.

Whereas older models rely on stability classes for the determination of and , more recent models increasingly rely on Monin-Obukhov similarity theory to derive these parameters.

Briggs plume rise equations

The Gaussian air pollutant dispersion equation (discussed above) requires the input of H which is the pollutant plume's centerline height above ground level. H is the sum of Hs (the actual physical height of the pollutant plume's emission source point) plus ΔH (the plume rise due the plume's buoyancy).

Visualization of a buoyant Gaussian air pollutant dispersion plume

To determine ΔH, many if not most of the air dispersion models developed between the late 1960s and the early 2000s used what are known as "the Briggs equations." G.A. Briggs first published his plume rise observations and comparisons in 1965.[7] In 1968, at a symposium sponsored by CONCAWE (a Dutch organization), he compared many of the plume rise models then available in the literature.[8] In that same year, Briggs also wrote the section of the publication edited by Slade[9] dealing with the comparative analyses of plume rise models. That was followed in 1969 by his classical critical review of the entire plume rise literature,[10] in which he proposed a set of plume rise equations which have become widely known as "the Briggs equations". Subsequently, Briggs modified his 1969 plume rise equations in 1971 and in 1972.[11][12]

Briggs divided air pollution plumes into these four general categories:

  • Cold jet plumes in calm ambient air conditions
  • Cold jet plumes in windy ambient air conditions
  • Hot, buoyant plumes in calm ambient air conditions
  • Hot, buoyant plumes in windy ambient air conditions

Briggs considered the trajectory of cold jet plumes to be dominated by their initial velocity momentum, and the trajectory of hot, buoyant plumes to be dominated by their buoyant momentum to the extent that their initial velocity momentum was relatively unimportant. Although Briggs proposed plume rise equations for each of the above plume categories, it is important to emphasize that "the Briggs equations" which become widely used are those that he proposed for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes.

In general, Briggs's equations for bent-over, hot buoyant plumes are based on observations and data involving plumes from typical combustion sources such as the flue gas stacks from steam-generating boilers burning fossil fuels in large power plants. Therefore the stack exit velocities were probably in the range of 20 to 100 ft/s (6 to 30 m/s) with exit temperatures ranging from 250 to 500 °F (120 to 260 °C).

A logic diagram for using the Briggs equations[5] to obtain the plume rise trajectory of bent-over buoyant plumes is presented below:

BriggsLogic.png
where:  
Δh = plume rise, in m
F  = buoyancy factor, in m4s−3
x = downwind distance from plume source, in m
xf = downwind distance from plume source to point of maximum plume rise, in m
u = windspeed at actual stack height, in m/s
s  = stability parameter, in s−2

The above parameters used in the Briggs' equations are discussed in Beychok's book.[5]

References

  1. J.C. Fensterstock et al, "Reduction of air pollution potential through environmental planning", JAPCA, Vol. 21, No. 7, 1971.
  2. C.H. Bosanquet and J.L. Pearson, "The spread of smoke and gases from chimneys", Trans. Faraday Soc., 32:1249, 1936.
  3. O.G. Sutton, "The problem of diffusion in the lower atmosphere", QJRMS, 73:257, 1947.
  4. O.G. Sutton, "The theoretical distribution of airborne pollution from factory chimneys", QJRMS, 73:426, 1947.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 M.R. Beychok (2005). Fundamentals Of Stack Gas Dispersion, 4th Edition. author-published. ISBN 0-9644588-0-2. .
  6. D. B. Turner (1994). Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates: an introduction to dispersion modeling, 2nd Edition. CRC Press. ISBN 1-56670-023-X. .
  7. G.A. Briggs, "A plume rise model compared with observations", JAPCA, 15:433–438, 1965.
  8. G.A. Briggs, "CONCAWE meeting: discussion of the comparative consequences of different plume rise formulas", Atmos. Envir., 2:228–232, 1968.
  9. D.H. Slade (editor), "Meteorology and atomic energy 1968", Air Resources Laboratory, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, 1968.
  10. G.A. Briggs, "Plume Rise", USAEC Critical Review Series, 1969.
  11. G.A. Briggs, "Some recent analyses of plume rise observation", Proc. Second Internat'l. Clean Air Congress, Academic Press, New York, 1971.
  12. G.A. Briggs, "Discussion: chimney plumes in neutral and stable surroundings", Atmos. Envir., 6:507–510, 1972.

Further reading

  • M.R. Beychok (2005). Fundamentals Of Stack Gas Dispersion, 4th Edition. author-published. ISBN 0-9644588-0-2. 
  • K.B. Schnelle and P.R. Dey (1999). Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling Compliance Guide, 1st Edition. McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 0-07-058059-6. 
  • D.B. Turner (1994). Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates: An Introduction to Dispersion Modeling, 2nd Edition. CRC Press. ISBN 1-56670-023-X. 
  • S.P. Arya (1998). Air Pollution Meteorology and Dispersion, 1st Edition. Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-507398-3. 
  • R. Barrat (2001). Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling, 1st Edition. Earthscan Publications. ISBN 1-85383-642-7. 
  • S.R. Hanna and R.E. Britter (2002). Wind Flow and Vapor Cloud Dispersion at Industrial and Urban Sites, 1st Edition. Wiley-American Institute of Chemical Engineers. ISBN 0-8169-0863-X. 
  • P. Zannetti (1990). Air pollution modeling : theories, computational methods, and available software. Van Nostrand Reinhold. ISBN 0-442-30805-1.