CZ:Why should experts join CZ?: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
(Add answer. plus another question+answer)
imported>Gareth Leng
(Trimmed, but candidate for deletion?)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Sorry, this page isn't yet written.'''
* Why community service of this sort; creating a free, online, encyclopaedia?
 
Folks, we need a page that addresses this question.  It should answer the following concerns (draft answers included for some):
 
* Why community service of this sort?
** Many experts (especially academic experts) have as one of their primary roles the dispersal of their knowledge. Citizendium is a way to do this, and reach a world-wide audience.
** Many experts (especially academic experts) have as one of their primary roles the dispersal of their knowledge. Citizendium is a way to do this, and reach a world-wide audience.


* Can I get any academic credit for my work here?  How?
* Wikipedia has taken over the world.  If I want to work on an online encyclopaedia that has a real-world impact, shouldn't I be working there?
** We are currently in the final stages of discussing a number of different proposals to allow people to be credited for the content they create (or help create) on Citizendium. We expect to have an initial policy out soon, which will allow primary authors of articles to be listed.
** Wikipedia has many critics, who have a number of complaints with a great deal of validity to them: you can't ''trust'' the contents of articles there (although most are usually fine); the articles often aren't well written (quick, un-considered 'drive-by' editing often degrades an article, rather than improving it); articles on contentious topics are always in a state of siege; etc. Don't get us wrong, Wikipedia was a fantastic 'first try' in the creation of a free online encyclopaedia; but it has major problems, problems that are probably too fundamental to the very nature of the Wikipedia community to be able to fix them. Citizendium is based on the Wikipedia experience, and tries to correct as many of the problems experience has revealed there as we can. Besides, once you have written content here, it can easily be copied to Wikipedia, if anyone wants to.  
 
* Wikipedia has taken over the world.  If I want to work on a wiki that has a real-world impact, shouldn't I be working there?
** Wikipedia has many critics, who have complaints with a great deal of validity to them: you can't ''trust'' the contents of articles there (although most are usually fine); the articles often aren't well written; articles on contentious topics are always in a state of siege; etc. Don't get us wrong, Wikipedia was a fantastic 'first try' in the creation of a free online encyclopaedia; but it has major problems, problems that are too fundamental to the very nature of the Wikipedia community to be able to fix. Citizendium is based heavily on the Wikipedia experience, and tries to correct as many of the problems as we can. Citizendium is not very big at the moment, but it has exactly the same feel that Wikipedia did in its early days (and there are a number of long-time Wikipedians here, who recognize the atmosphere) - it's an idea whose time has come.
 
* As an expert, why should I work here, rather than Wikipedia, which is much better known?
** For one, you will be able to get academic credit for your work here (see above). For another, we expect many experts will find Citizendium a more congenial place to work; in addition to the reasons listed below, our 'real names' policy seems to produce more more pleasant interaction among our contributors.


* Why is Citizendium better for experts, anyway?
* Why is Citizendium better for experts?
** Experts often find Wikipedia a less than welcoming environment, for a variety of reasons, among them the extreme egalitarianism. Again, despite years of people pointing out the scale of the problem, and how much Wikipedia loses because of this, the problem hasn't been fixed, because doing so would be too major a change to the very nature of the Wikipedia community. While Citizendium enthusiastically welcomes everyone (and, in fact, many of our major contributors are in fact technically 'amateurs' at some of the fields in which they contribute here), we ''all'' understand that experts ''do'' usually know more - and should be listened to carefully.
** Experts often find Wikipedia a less than welcoming environment, for a variety of reasons, among them the extreme egalitarianism. While Citizendium enthusiastically welcomes everyone (and, in fact, a number of our major contributors are in fact technically 'amateurs' at some of the fields in which they contribute here), we ''all'' understand that experts ''do'' usually know more - and should be listened to carefully.


{{Editor Policy}}
{{Editor Policy}}

Latest revision as of 13:14, 9 December 2010

  • Why community service of this sort; creating a free, online, encyclopaedia?
    • Many experts (especially academic experts) have as one of their primary roles the dispersal of their knowledge. Citizendium is a way to do this, and reach a world-wide audience.
  • Wikipedia has taken over the world. If I want to work on an online encyclopaedia that has a real-world impact, shouldn't I be working there?
    • Wikipedia has many critics, who have a number of complaints with a great deal of validity to them: you can't trust the contents of articles there (although most are usually fine); the articles often aren't well written (quick, un-considered 'drive-by' editing often degrades an article, rather than improving it); articles on contentious topics are always in a state of siege; etc. Don't get us wrong, Wikipedia was a fantastic 'first try' in the creation of a free online encyclopaedia; but it has major problems, problems that are probably too fundamental to the very nature of the Wikipedia community to be able to fix them. Citizendium is based on the Wikipedia experience, and tries to correct as many of the problems experience has revealed there as we can. Besides, once you have written content here, it can easily be copied to Wikipedia, if anyone wants to.
  • Why is Citizendium better for experts?
    • Experts often find Wikipedia a less than welcoming environment, for a variety of reasons, among them the extreme egalitarianism. While Citizendium enthusiastically welcomes everyone (and, in fact, a number of our major contributors are in fact technically 'amateurs' at some of the fields in which they contribute here), we all understand that experts do usually know more - and should be listened to carefully.


Citizendium Editor Policy
The Editor Role | Approval Process | Article Deletion Policy
See also: Citizendium Council | Content Policy | Help for Editors
How to Edit
Getting Started Organization Technical Help
Policies Content Policy
 
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=CZ:Why_should_experts_join_CZ%3F&oldid=436823"