Global warming/Bibliography

Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.

• In 2009, a book defending the skeptical view was published by the Heartland Institute,S. Fred Singer and Craig Idso, Climate Change Reconsidered Climate Change Reconsidered Heartland Institute, June 2009, ISBN-13 – 978-1-934791-28-8, (The Heartland Institute takes a partisan position against what they call "myths of global warming").

• Amstrup, SC; et al. (2006). "Recent observations of intraspecific predation and cannibalism among polar bears in the southern Beaufort Sea". Polar Biol 29: 997–1002.

• Association of British Insurers (2005-06). Financial Risks of Climate Change. 
• Barnett, TP; et al. (2005). "Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions". Nature 438: 303–9.

• Behrenfeld, MJ; et al. (2006). "Climate-driven trends in contemporary ocean productivity". Nature 444: 752–5.

• Choi, O; Fisher A (2005). "The Impacts of Socioeconomic Development and Climate Change on Severe Weather Catastrophe Losses: Mid-Atlantic Region (MAR) and the U.S.". Climate Change 58: 149–70.

• Doran, PT (2010). "Examining the scientific consensus on climate change". Eos 90: 21-2.

• Dyurgerov, MB; MF Meier (2005). Glaciers and the Changing Earth System: a 2004 Snapshot. Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research Occasional Paper #58. 
• Emanuel, KA (2005). "Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones over the past 30 years". Nature 436: 686–8.

• Hansen, J; et al. (2005). "Earth's energy imbalance: confirmation and implications". Science 308: 1431–5.

• Hinrichs, Kai-Uwe; et al. (2003). "Molecular fossil record of elevated methane Levels in late Pleistocene coastal waters". Science 299: 1214–7.

• Hirsch, T. Plants revealed as methane source, BBC, 2006.

• Hoyt, DV; KH Schatten (1993). "A discussion of plausible solar irradiance variations, 1700–1992". J Geophys Res 98: 18,895–18,906.

• Kenneth, JP; et al. (2003-02-14). Methane Hydrates in Quaternary Climate Change: The Clathrate Gun Hypothesis. American Geophysical Union. 
• Keppler, F, et al.. Global Warming - The Blame Is not with the Plants, Max Planck Society, 2006.

• Kurzweil R (2006–07). "Nanotech Could Give Global Warming a Big Chill". Forbes / Wolfe Nanotech Report 5.

• Lean, JL; et al. (2002). "The effect of increasing solar activity on the Sun's total and open magnetic flux during multiple cycles: Implications for solar forcing of climate". Geophys Res Lett 29.

• Lerner, KL; Brenda Wilmoth Lerner (2006). Environmental issues : essential primary sources. Thomson Gale. ISBN 1414406258. 
• McLaughlin, JB; et al. (2005). "Outbreak of Vibrio parahaemolyticus gastroenteritis associated with Alaskan oysters". New Eng J Med 353: 1463–70.

• Muscheler, R; et al. (2005). "Climate: How unusual is today's solar activity?". Nature 436: 1084–1087.

• Oerlemans, J (2005). "Extracting a Climate Signal from 169 Glacier Records". Science 308: 675–7.

• Oreskes, N (2004). "Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change". Science 306: 1686.

• Purse, BV; et al. (2005). "Climate change and the recent emergence of bluetongue in Europe". Nature Rev Microbiol 3: 171-81.

• Revkin, AC. Rise in Gases Unmatched by a History in Ancient Ice, The New York Times, 2005.

• Ruddiman, WF (2005). Earth's Climate Past and Future. New York: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-7167-3741-8. 
• Ruddiman, WF (2005). Plows, Plagues, and Petroleum: How Humans Took Control of Climate. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-12164-8. 
• Schneider, SH; et al. (2010). "Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change". IPCC: 779-810.

• Solanki, SK; et al. (2004). "Unusual activity of the Sun during recent decades compared to the previous 11,000 years.". Nature 431: 1084–7.

• {{cite journal | last = Solanki | first = SK | coauthors = et al. | date = 2005 | title = Climate: How unusual is today's solar activity? (Reply)| journal = Nature|pages = E4-5 | url = http://cc.oulu.fi/%7Eusoskin/personal/sola_nature05.pdf
• Sowers, T (2006). "Late Quaternary Atmospheric CH₄ Isotope Record Suggests Marine Clathrates Are Stable". Science 311: 838–40.

• Svensmark, H; et al. (2007). "Experimental evidence for the role of ions in particle nucleation under atmospheric conditions". Proc R Soc A 463: 385–96.

• United Nations Environment Programme (2012, November 27). Thawing of permafrost expected to cause significant additional global warming, not yet accounted for in climate predictions. ScienceDaily. Retrieved November 27, 2012.
• Walter, KM; et al. (2006). "Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming". Nature 443: 71–75.

• Wang, Y-M; et al. (2005). "Modeling the sun's magnetic field and irradiance since 1713". Astrophys J 625: 522–38.

• http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm Climate Sensitivity Reconsidered], Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, Forum on Physics & Society of the American Physical Society, July 2008. Here, Christopher Monckton, a critic of anthropogenic causes of global warming, takes issue with the 2007 IPCC report. Monckton is a British journalist and was assisted during the preparation of his APS Forum contribution by physicists, meteorologists and others at Harvard University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Imperial College (London, England), St. Andrews University (Scotland) and other universities. The major point made by Monckton is that the IPCC's estimated climate sensitivity of 3.26 °C is much too high. Using the same methodology and the same physical effect parameters as did the IPCC, but estimating his own values of those parameters, Monckton obtains a climate sensitivity of 0.58 °C. In other words, Monckton predicts that when the atmospheric CO₂ concentration reaches 556 ppm (expected later this century), the Earth's surface temperature will be only 0.58 °C higher than it was in 1750.Monckton documents and references his calculations in much detail. Although Monckton is a journalist, and his calculations include numerous arbitrary assumptions (such as reducing widely accepted values of certain parameters by an assumed factor of three), his work should not be discounted simply because it appeared only in the APS's Forum (that is not peer-reviewed). Monckton's short article summarizes ideas current among the climate skeptics.