Talk:Theories of Biblical inspiration: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce m (Talk:Theories of Biblical Inspiration moved to Talk:Theories of Biblical inspiration: I think that under standard CZ policy for article titles that "inspiration" should not be capped) |
imported>Michael Yates |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Subpages}} | {{Subpages}} | ||
== Needs a little more generalization; seems to be written purely from a Christian standpoint == | |||
"Scripture", in my mind, does not equate to "Bible". Do these theories apply to the New Testament alone? The Old Testament? | |||
That doesn't quite work, given the Apocrypha are included. | |||
In short, the lead needs to be much more general, and possibly with links to clarifying terms. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 12:53, 10 June 2008 (CDT) | |||
:Sounds like a good suggestion. I am totally unaware of Jewish beliefs on this issue, and the theories listed are primarily Christian ones. Generally, all but '''partial''' are applied only to the 66 book canon (Old and New Testament). [[User:Michael Yates|Michael Yates]] 14:06, 10 June 2008 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 13:07, 10 June 2008
Needs a little more generalization; seems to be written purely from a Christian standpoint
"Scripture", in my mind, does not equate to "Bible". Do these theories apply to the New Testament alone? The Old Testament?
That doesn't quite work, given the Apocrypha are included.
In short, the lead needs to be much more general, and possibly with links to clarifying terms. Howard C. Berkowitz 12:53, 10 June 2008 (CDT)
- Sounds like a good suggestion. I am totally unaware of Jewish beliefs on this issue, and the theories listed are primarily Christian ones. Generally, all but partial are applied only to the 66 book canon (Old and New Testament). Michael Yates 14:06, 10 June 2008 (CDT)