Union: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Pinch (layout) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{subpages}} | |||
In [[set theory]], '''union''' (denoted as ∪) is a set operation between two sets that forms a set containing the elements of both sets. | In [[set theory]], '''union''' (denoted as ∪) is a set operation between two sets that forms a set containing the elements of both sets. | ||
Line 32: | Line 33: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
* {{cite book | author=Paul Halmos | authorlink=Paul Halmos | title=Naive set theory | series=The University Series in Undergraduate Mathematics | publisher=[[Van Nostrand Reinhold]] | year=1960 }} | * {{cite book | author=Paul Halmos | authorlink=Paul Halmos | title=Naive set theory | series=The University Series in Undergraduate Mathematics | publisher=[[Van Nostrand Reinhold]] | year=1960 }} Section 4. | ||
* {{cite book | author=Keith J. Devlin | authorlink=Keith Devlin | title=Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory | series=Universitext | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | year=1979 | isbn=0-387-90441-7 }} | * {{cite book | author=Keith J. Devlin | authorlink=Keith Devlin | title=Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory | series=Universitext | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | year=1979 | isbn=0-387-90441-7 | pages=5,10 }} | ||
[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 16:01, 2 November 2024
In set theory, union (denoted as ∪) is a set operation between two sets that forms a set containing the elements of both sets.
Formally, union A ∪ B means that if a ∈ A ∪ B, then a ∈ A ∨ a ∈ B, where ∨ - is logical or. We see this connection between ∪ and ∨ symbols.
Properties
The union operation is:
- associative - (A ∪ B) ∪ C = A ∪ (B ∪ C)
- commutative - A ∪ B = B ∪ A.
General unions
Finite unions
The union of any finite number of sets may be defined inductively, as
Infinite unions
The union of a general family of sets Xλ as λ ranges over a general index set Λ may be written in similar notation as
We may drop the indexing notation and define the union of a set to be the set of elements of the elements of that set:
In this notation the union of two sets A and B may be expressed as
See also
References
- Paul Halmos (1960). Naive set theory. Van Nostrand Reinhold. Section 4.
- Keith J. Devlin (1979). Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory. Springer-Verlag, 5,10. ISBN 0-387-90441-7.