Dmitry Sklyarov: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sandy Harris
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
'''Dmitry Sklyarov''' is a Russian programmer who was arrested in the US after giving a presentation at the [[Defcon]] conference after demonstrating that various products for securing electronic books were [[Snake oil (cryptography)|extremely weak]].<ref>{{citation
'''Dmitry Sklyarov''' is a Russian programmer who was arrested in the US after giving a presentation at the [[Defcon]] conference after demonstrating that various products for securing electronic books were [[Snake (animal) oil (cryptography)|extremely weak]].<ref>{{citation
| url = http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Adobe/Gallery/ds-defcon/sld001.htm
| url = http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/Adobe/Gallery/ds-defcon/sld001.htm
| author = Dmitry Sklyarov
| author = Dmitry Sklyarov
Line 17: Line 17:


==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 06:00, 8 August 2024

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Dmitry Sklyarov is a Russian programmer who was arrested in the US after giving a presentation at the Defcon conference after demonstrating that various products for securing electronic books were extremely weak.[1] He and his employer, Elcomsoft, were charged under the DMCA with distributing illegal tools to circumvent publishers' encryption technology. Both he and the publisher were eventually found not guilty on all charges.[2]

Sklyarov was the first person to be charged under the DMCA.[3] The case became a cause celebre for opponents of the DMCA, and more generally for critics of DRM technology. There was a web site,[4] a mailing list, calls to action,[5] [6] demonstrations and lectures,[7] even a "Boycott Adobe" campaign since it was Adobe who were behind the charges.

The case got extensive coverage in the computer industry press,[8] and quite a bit in mainstream media.[9]

References