Talk:Special function: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day (is the list in catalogs redundant?) |
imported>Peter Schmitt |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Catalogs/list== | ==Catalogs/list== | ||
Is there a distinction between the related articles page and the [[Special function/Catalogs/List|list]] under the catalogs tab? They seem to serve the same function and should probably be merged. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 20:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | Is there a distinction between the related articles page and the [[Special function/Catalogs/List|list]] under the catalogs tab? They seem to serve the same function and should probably be merged. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 20:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
: This is a completely undeveloped cluster. I moved the Related Articles of the former Catalog to the list (without revising its content) because a list of special functions may be useful, but Related Articles should be more selective in order to give useful recommandations, not just a list. [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 21:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::So should we just delete the list? That would seem to make more sense. [[User:Chris Day|Chris Day]] 21:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: I don't think so. It does not hurt, but it may be useful if someone starts to work on this article. [[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 13:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 07:15, 9 December 2009
Catalogs/list
Is there a distinction between the related articles page and the list under the catalogs tab? They seem to serve the same function and should probably be merged. Chris Day 20:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- This is a completely undeveloped cluster. I moved the Related Articles of the former Catalog to the list (without revising its content) because a list of special functions may be useful, but Related Articles should be more selective in order to give useful recommandations, not just a list. Peter Schmitt 21:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- So should we just delete the list? That would seem to make more sense. Chris Day 21:42, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think so. It does not hurt, but it may be useful if someone starts to work on this article. Peter Schmitt 13:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)