Hamdi v. Rumsfeld/Related Articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Parent topics== | ==Parent topics== | ||
{{r|Supreme Court of the United States}} | {{r|Supreme Court of the United States of America}} | ||
{{r|Lawful combatant}} | {{r|Lawful combatant}} | ||
==Subtopics== | ==Subtopics== | ||
{{r|Yaser Esam Hamdi}} | {{r|Yaser Esam Hamdi}} | ||
| Line 14: | Line 13: | ||
{{r|Hamdan v. Rumsfeld|''Hamdan v. Rumsfeld''}} | {{r|Hamdan v. Rumsfeld|''Hamdan v. Rumsfeld''}} | ||
{{r|Posse Comitatus Act}} | {{r|Posse Comitatus Act}} | ||
==Articles related by keyphrases (Bot populated)== | |||
{{r|Ex parte Quirin}} | |||
{{r|Hamdan v. Rumsfeld}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:00, 25 August 2024
- See also changes related to Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, or pages that link to Hamdi v. Rumsfeld or to this page or whose text contains "Hamdi v. Rumsfeld".
Parent topics
- Supreme Court of the United States of America [r]: Add brief definition or description
- Lawful combatant [r]: A person who meets the qualifications of the Geneva Conventions to be entitled to prisoner of war status [e]
Subtopics
- Detainee Treatment Act [r]: A 2005 Congressional act specifying explicit standards for prisoners in the custody of the U.S. military [e]
- Ex parte Quirin [r]: A 1942 Supreme Court of the United States ruling that affirmed the right to try captured enemy personnel, who operated in civilian clothing, by a Presidentially appointed secret military tribunal [e]
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [r]: A 2006 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, stating that there was no basis for trying, by U.S. military commission, a person captured in combat with U.S. allies on foreign soil, and turned over to U.S. forces [e]
- Posse Comitatus Act [r]: U.S. law, enacted in 1878 during Reconstruction, which forbids the use of U.S. Army forces for civilian law enforcement; it does not prohibit their use in disaster relief defined by the Stafford Act, or in situations of martial law; the greatest controversies surround the role of military forces in dealing with terrorism on U.S. soil [e]
- Ex parte Quirin [r]: A 1942 Supreme Court of the United States ruling that affirmed the right to try captured enemy personnel, who operated in civilian clothing, by a Presidentially appointed secret military tribunal [e]
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld [r]: A 2006 decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, stating that there was no basis for trying, by U.S. military commission, a person captured in combat with U.S. allies on foreign soil, and turned over to U.S. forces [e]