Term of art: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{PropDel}}<br><br> | |||
{{subpages}} | |||
A '''term of art''' is a word or phrase that is in common use, but, in a particular context, has a precise meaning. It is the antithesis of [[jargon]], where an uncommon word or phrase is used to describe something very specific, but where the jargon term is incomprehensible outside the area of use. Terms of art and jargon sometimes are characterized as different forms of [[slang]]. | A '''term of art''' is a word or phrase that is in common use, but, in a particular context, has a precise meaning. It is the antithesis of [[jargon]], where an uncommon word or phrase is used to describe something very specific, but where the jargon term is incomprehensible outside the area of use. Terms of art and jargon sometimes are characterized as different forms of [[slang]]. | ||
"Term of art" probably first came into use in law. <ref name=GU-Law>{{citation | "Term of art" probably first came into use in law. <ref name=GU-Law>{{citation | ||
| url = http://www.ll.georgetown.edu/tutorials/definitions/term_art.html | | url = http://www.ll.georgetown.edu/tutorials/definitions/term_art.html | | ||
| publisher = Georgetown University Law Library | | publisher = Georgetown University Law Library | ||
| title = Term of Art}}</ref> Random House makes the nuanced distinction that "art" is not used as in "artist", but as the specialized usage of an "artisan's" vocabulary. <blockquote>An ordinary technical term for which there is no other word or phrase is not a term of art. That criterion would exclude "CPU" and "RAM" in the computer field and "Phillips screwdriver" in carpentry. But fields other than the law do have terms of art. Using these terms consistently makes it easier for members of the same field--the in-group--to understand one another. For example, according to Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, "blanch," commonly 'to whiten', is a term of art with particular meanings in horticulture, metallurgy, and cooking. But only a pathologist would be likely to recognize a "nutmeg" liver or a "chicken-fat" clot. <ref name=RH>{{citation | | title = Term of Art}}</ref> Random House makes the nuanced distinction that "art" is not used as in "artist", but as the specialized usage of an "artisan's" vocabulary. <blockquote>An ordinary technical term for which there is no other word or phrase is not a term of art. That criterion would exclude "CPU" and "RAM" in the computer field and "Phillips screwdriver" in carpentry. But fields other than the law do have terms of art. Using these terms consistently makes it easier for members of the same field--the in-group--to understand one another. For example, according to Random House Webster's Unabridged Dictionary, "blanch," commonly 'to whiten', is a term of art with particular meanings in horticulture, metallurgy, and cooking. But only a pathologist would be likely to recognize a "nutmeg" liver or a "chicken-fat" clot. <ref name=RH>{{citation | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
| publisher = Words @ Random}}</ref></blockquote> | | publisher = Words @ Random}}</ref></blockquote> | ||
The U.S. courts have given particular attention to the phrase.<ref name= | The U.S. courts have given particular attention to the phrase.<ref name=Wests>{{citation | ||
| url = http://www. | | url = http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3437704349.html | ||
| publisher = | | publisher = West's Encyclopedia of American Law | ||
| title = Technical terminology: term of art}}</ref> "According to the Court, punitive damages is a legal term of art that has a widely accepted common-law meaning under state law." <ref>{{cite court | | title = Technical terminology: term of art}}</ref> "According to the Court, punitive damages is a legal term of art that has a widely accepted common-law meaning under state law." <ref>{{cite court | ||
|litigants=Molzof v. United States | |litigants=Molzof v. United States | ||
| Line 21: | Line 23: | ||
|url=http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=502&invol=301 | |url=http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=502&invol=301 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist|2}} | ||
[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] | |||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 25 October 2024
| This article may be deleted soon. | ||
|---|---|---|
 A term of art is a word or phrase that is in common use, but, in a particular context, has a precise meaning. It is the antithesis of jargon, where an uncommon word or phrase is used to describe something very specific, but where the jargon term is incomprehensible outside the area of use. Terms of art and jargon sometimes are characterized as different forms of slang. "Term of art" probably first came into use in law. [1] Random House makes the nuanced distinction that "art" is not used as in "artist", but as the specialized usage of an "artisan's" vocabulary.
The U.S. courts have given particular attention to the phrase.[3] "According to the Court, punitive damages is a legal term of art that has a widely accepted common-law meaning under state law." [4] References
|
||
