User:Daniel Mietchen/Talks/COASP 2010/Obstacles: Difference between revisions
< User:Daniel Mietchen | Talks | COASP 2010
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Daniel Mietchen m (started) |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{AccountNotLive}} | |||
{{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}} | {{:User/Daniel_Mietchen/COASP2010/Template}} | ||
__NOTOC__ | |||
;;;<blockquote>''While scientists have gloried in the disruptive effect that the Web is having on publishers and libraries, with many fields strongly pushing open publication models, we are much more resistant to letting it be a disruptive force in the practice of our disciplines. — [http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MIS.2007.93 James Hendler]''</blockquote> | |||
==Obstacles to using wikis in scholarly publishing== | ==Obstacles to using wikis in scholarly publishing== | ||
===Technical=== | |||
*Few, e.g. integration with reference managers (particularly for items not available online), or automated XML2wiki | |||
===Social=== | |||
====Habits==== | |||
*Scholars are used to type their manuscripts in Word processors for an end product designed for print | |||
*Publishers have an opportunity to initiate change here | |||
====Attitudes==== | |||
*recognition problem by funders, tenure committees and scientists in general | *recognition problem by funders, tenure committees and scientists in general | ||
**similar problems affected online publications, open data and open access long before, and their initial adoption heavily depended on model projects | **similar problems affected online publications, open data and open access long before, and their initial adoption heavily depended on model projects | ||
*scholars not ready to have their writings peer-edited | *scholars not ready to have their writings peer-edited | ||
Latest revision as of 02:41, 22 November 2023
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
The account of this former contributor was not re-activated after the server upgrade of March 2022.
Wikis as platforms for Open Access publishing · Prototypes · Editorial policies · Guided tour ·
Obstacles · Alternatives · Outlook · Summary · Slides · Video · Q & A · Demo
While scientists have gloried in the disruptive effect that the Web is having on publishers and libraries, with many fields strongly pushing open publication models, we are much more resistant to letting it be a disruptive force in the practice of our disciplines. — James Hendler
Obstacles to using wikis in scholarly publishing
Technical
- Few, e.g. integration with reference managers (particularly for items not available online), or automated XML2wiki
Social
Habits
- Scholars are used to type their manuscripts in Word processors for an end product designed for print
- Publishers have an opportunity to initiate change here
Attitudes
- recognition problem by funders, tenure committees and scientists in general
- similar problems affected online publications, open data and open access long before, and their initial adoption heavily depended on model projects
- scholars not ready to have their writings peer-edited