CZ:Featured article/Current: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Chunbum Park
imported>John Stephenson
(template)
 
(111 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== '''[[King cobra]]''' ==
{{:{{FeaturedArticleTitle}}}}
----
<small>
The '''King cobra''' (''Ophiophagus hannah''), also sometimes referred to as '''Hamadryad''', is the world’s largest venomous snake, capable of growing up to {{convert|5.5|m|ft}}, is rare, but has wide a distribution. This monotypic [[genus]] of the family [[Elapidae]] is considered as a species complex, as the species varies in colouration, scalation and body proportion. The King cobra is distributed in [[India]], [[Nepal]], [[Bangladesh]], [[Bhutan]], [[Myanmar]], [[People's Republic of China|China]], and most parts of [[Southeast Asia]] including [[Indonesia]] and the [[Philippines]]. The King cobra is listed under Schedule II of the ''Indian Wildlife Protection Act 1972''; Appendix II of CITES; and in the Vulnerable category by IUCN (2010).This is a very elusive species, rarely seen and rarely bites humans, when it does, however, the mortality rate is generally low.
==Footnotes==
 
==Taxonomy and etymology==
The king cobra is the sole member of genus ''Ophiophagus'', while most other cobras are members of the genus ''Naja''. They can be distinguished from other cobras by size and hood. King cobras are generally larger than other cobras, and the stripe on the neck is like the symbol "^" instead of a double or single eye shape that may be seen in most of the other Asian cobras. Moreover, the hood  of the king cobra is narrower and longer.<ref name=vs>O'Shea, Mark. (2005). ''Venomous Snakes of the World''. UK: New Holland Publishers. ISBN 0-691-12436-1</ref> A foolproof method of identification is if on the head, clearly visible, is the presence of a pair of large scales known as [[Occipital scales|occipitals]], at the back of the top of the head. These are behind the usual "nine-plate" arrangement typical of colubrids and elapids, and are unique to the king cobra.
 
''[[King cobra|.... (read more)]]''
 
{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed" style="width: 90%; float: center; margin: 0.5em 1em 0.8em 0px;"
|-
! style="text-align: center;" | &nbsp;[[King cobra#Cited references|notes]]
|-
|
{{reflist|2}}
{{reflist|2}}
|}
</small>

Latest revision as of 09:19, 11 September 2020

The Mathare Valley slum near Nairobi, Kenya, in 2009.

Poverty is deprivation based on lack of material resources. The concept is value-based and political. Hence its definition, causes and remedies (and the possibility of remedies) are highly contentious.[1] The word poverty may also be used figuratively to indicate a lack, instead of material goods or money, of any kind of quality, as in a poverty of imagination.

Definitions

Primary and secondary poverty

The use of the terms primary and secondary poverty dates back to Seebohm Rowntree, who conducted the second British survey to calculate the extent of poverty. This was carried out in York and was published in 1899. He defined primary poverty as having insufficient income to “obtain the minimum necessaries for the maintenance of merely physical efficiency”. In secondary poverty, the income “would be sufficient for the maintenance of merely physical efficiency were it not that some portion of it is absorbed by some other expenditure.” Even with these rigorous criteria he found that 9.9% of the population was in primary poverty and a further 17.9% in secondary.[2]

Absolute and comparative poverty

More recent definitions tend to use the terms absolute and comparative poverty. Absolute is in line with Rowntree's primary poverty, but comparative poverty is usually expressed in terms of ability to play a part in the society in which a person lives. Comparative poverty will thus vary from one country to another.[3] The difficulty of definition is illustrated by the fact that a recession can actually reduce "poverty".

Causes of poverty

The causes of poverty most often considered are:

  • Character defects
  • An established “culture of poverty”, with low expectations handed down from one generation to another
  • Unemployment
  • Irregular employment, and/or low pay
  • Position in the life cycle (see below) and household size
  • Disability
  • Structural inequality, both within countries and between countries. (R H Tawney: “What thoughtful rich people call the problem of poverty, thoughtful poor people call with equal justice a problem of riches”)[4]

As noted above, most of these, or the extent to which they can be, or should be changed, are matters of heated controversy.

Footnotes

  1. Alcock, P. Understanding poverty. Macmillan. 1997. ch 1.
  2. Harris, B. The origins of the British welfare state. Palgrave Macmillan. 2004. Also, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography.
  3. Alcock, Pt II
  4. Alcock, Preface to 1st edition and pt III.