Congressional Progressive Caucus: Difference between revisions
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "California" to "California (U.S. state)") |
Pat Palmer (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - "communications intelligence" to "communications intelligence") |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{PropDel}}<br><br> | |||
{{subpages}} | {{subpages}} | ||
{{TOC|right}} | {{TOC|right}} | ||
The '''Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC)''', is the largest caucus group within the Democratic Caucus. It was established in 1991, and is chaired by [[Raúl Grijalva]] ([[ | The '''Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC)''', is the largest caucus group within the Democratic Caucus. It was established in 1991, and is chaired by [[Raúl Grijalva]] ([[Democratic Party (United States)|D-]][[Arizona (U.S. state)|Arizona]]) and [[Lynn Woolsey]] ([[Democratic Party (United States)|D-]][[California (U.S. state)]]). | ||
It states four key principles: | It states four key principles: | ||
Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
===Immigration Reform=== | ===Immigration Reform=== | ||
===Domestic surveillance=== | ===Domestic surveillance=== | ||
CPC believes the [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act]] (FISA), with warrants issued by the [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]], is the sole authority for | CPC believes the [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act]] (FISA), with warrants issued by the [[Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court]], is the sole authority for communications intelligence in the United States or directed at United States citizens. It does not, however, require that foreign communications that, for technical reasons, have part of their route through the United States are subject to the FISA. It accepts that the FISA will periodically need modernization to keep up with technological developments. "Congress must have regular access to information about how many U.S. communications are being collected and the authority to require court orders when it becomes clear that a certain program or surveillance of a target is scooping up communications of U.S. persons."<ref name=CPC-FISA>{{citation | ||
| title = On Reforming the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and Protecting Our Civil Liberties | | title = On Reforming the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act and Protecting Our Civil Liberties | ||
| date = 5 October 2007 | | date = 5 October 2007 | ||
Line 30: | Line 31: | ||
===Iraq=== | ===Iraq=== | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]] |
Latest revision as of 07:33, 26 August 2024
This article may be deleted soon. | ||
---|---|---|
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC), is the largest caucus group within the Democratic Caucus. It was established in 1991, and is chaired by Raúl Grijalva (D-Arizona) and Lynn Woolsey (D-California (U.S. state)). It states four key principles:
News releasesHealth CareThe "Quad Caucus", of CPC, Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, Congressional Black Caucus, and Congressional Hispanic Caucus sent a letter, on 2 November 2009, to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, agreeing on the need for the public option in the House-passed H.R. 3962, but also asking that certain areas be strengthened: Ensure sufficiency ofsubsidies within the Health Exchange to provide affordability of premiums for those who do not currently have health insurance.
Formal positionsInternational Trade Reform and U.S. Trade PolicyImmigration ReformDomestic surveillanceCPC believes the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), with warrants issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, is the sole authority for communications intelligence in the United States or directed at United States citizens. It does not, however, require that foreign communications that, for technical reasons, have part of their route through the United States are subject to the FISA. It accepts that the FISA will periodically need modernization to keep up with technological developments. "Congress must have regular access to information about how many U.S. communications are being collected and the authority to require court orders when it becomes clear that a certain program or surveillance of a target is scooping up communications of U.S. persons."[1] IranIraqReferences
|