Missouri Compromise: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
The '''Missouri Compromise''' was a [[United States of America|U.S.]] law of 1820 that balanced desires of northern states to prevent expansion of slavery in the country with those of southern states to expand it. It admitted [[Missouri]] as a [[Slave states and free states|slave state]] and [[Maine#Statehood|Maine]] as a free state and declared a policy of prohibiting slavery in the remaining [[Louisiana Purchase]] lands north of the [[parallel 36°30′ north|36°30′ parallel]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hammond|first=John Craig|date=March 2019|title=President, Planter, Politician: James Monroe, the Missouri Crisis, and the Politics of Slavery|journal=Journal of American History|volume=105|issue=4|pages=843–867|doi=10.1093/jahist/jaz002}}</ref> The [[16th United States Congress]] passed the legislation on March 3, 1820, and President [[James Monroe]] signed it on March 6, 1820.<ref>Hammond, 2019<br />Dangerfield, 1966. p. 125<br />Wilentz, 2004. p. 382</ref>
The '''Missouri Compromise''' was a [[United States of America|U.S.]] law, passed in 1820 and in effect until 1854 (when the [[Kansas Nebraska Act]] overrode it), that balanced desires of northern states to prevent expansion of slavery in the U.S. with those of southern states to expand slavery. It admitted [[Missouri]] as a [[Slave states and free states|slave state]] and [[Maine#Statehood|Maine]] as a free state and declared a policy of prohibiting slavery in the remaining [[Louisiana Purchase]] lands north of the [[parallel 36°30′ north|36°30′ parallel]].<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Hammond|first=John Craig|date=March 2019|title=President, Planter, Politician: James Monroe, the Missouri Crisis, and the Politics of Slavery|journal=Journal of American History|volume=105|issue=4|pages=843–867|doi=10.1093/jahist/jaz002}}</ref> The [[16th United States Congress]] passed the legislation on March 3, 1820, and President [[James Monroe]] signed it on March 6, 1820.<ref>Hammond, 2019<br />Dangerfield, 1966. p. 125<br />Wilentz, 2004. p. 382</ref>


Earlier, in February 1819, Representative [[James Tallmadge Jr.]], a [[Democratic-Republican Party|Democratic-Republican]] (Jeffersonian Republican) from [[New York (state)|New York]], had submitted two amendments to Missouri's request for statehood that included restrictions on slavery. Southerners objected to any bill that imposed federal restrictions on slavery and believed that it was a state issue, as settled by the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]]. However, with the Senate evenly split at the opening of the debates, both sections possessing 11 states, the admission of Missouri as a slave state would give the South an advantage. Northern critics including [[Federalist Party|Federalists]] and Democratic-Republicans objected to the expansion of slavery into the [[Louisiana Purchase]] territory on the Constitutional inequalities of the [[Three-Fifths Compromise|three-fifths rule]], which conferred Southern representation in the federal government derived from a state's slave population.
Earlier, in February 1819, Representative [[James Tallmadge Jr.]], a [[Democratic-Republican Party|Democratic-Republican]] (Jeffersonian Republican) from [[New York (state)|New York]], had submitted two amendments to Missouri's request for statehood that included restrictions on slavery. Southerners objected to any bill that imposed federal restrictions on slavery and believed that it was a state issue, as settled by the [[United States Constitution|Constitution]]. However, with the Senate evenly split at the opening of the debates, both sections possessing 11 states, the admission of Missouri as a slave state would give the South an advantage. Northern critics including [[Federalist Party|Federalists]] and Democratic-Republicans objected to the expansion of slavery into the [[Louisiana Purchase]] territory on the Constitutional inequalities of the [[Three-Fifths Compromise|three-fifths rule]], which conferred Southern representation in the federal government derived from a state's slave population.
Line 8: Line 8:
When free-soil Maine offered its petition for statehood, the Senate quickly linked the Maine and Missouri bills, making Maine admission a condition for Missouri entering the Union as a slave state. Senator [[Jesse B. Thomas]] of Illinois added a compromise proviso that excluded slavery from all remaining lands of the Louisiana Purchase north of the [[Parallel 36°30′ north|36°&nbsp;30' parallel]]. The combined measures passed the Senate, only to be voted down in the House by Northern representatives who held out for a free Missouri. [[Speaker of the United States House of Representatives|Speaker of the House]] [[Henry Clay]] of [[Kentucky]], in a desperate bid to break the deadlock, divided the Senate bills. Clay and his pro-compromise allies succeeded in pressuring half of the anti-restrictionist House Southerners to submit to the passage of the Thomas proviso and maneuvered a number of restrictionist House northerners to acquiesce in supporting Missouri as a slave state.<ref>Brown, 1966. p. 25: "[Henry Clay], who managed to bring up the separate parts of the compromise separately in the House, enabling the Old Republicans [in the South] to provide him with a margin of victory on the closely contested Missouri [statehood] bill while saved their pride by voting against the Thomas Proviso."</ref><ref>Wilentz, 2004. p. 381</ref> While the Missouri question in the 15th Congress ended in stalemate on March 4, 1819, with the House sustaining its northern antislavery position and the Senate blocking a state that restricted slavery, it succeeded in the 16th Congress.
When free-soil Maine offered its petition for statehood, the Senate quickly linked the Maine and Missouri bills, making Maine admission a condition for Missouri entering the Union as a slave state. Senator [[Jesse B. Thomas]] of Illinois added a compromise proviso that excluded slavery from all remaining lands of the Louisiana Purchase north of the [[Parallel 36°30′ north|36°&nbsp;30' parallel]]. The combined measures passed the Senate, only to be voted down in the House by Northern representatives who held out for a free Missouri. [[Speaker of the United States House of Representatives|Speaker of the House]] [[Henry Clay]] of [[Kentucky]], in a desperate bid to break the deadlock, divided the Senate bills. Clay and his pro-compromise allies succeeded in pressuring half of the anti-restrictionist House Southerners to submit to the passage of the Thomas proviso and maneuvered a number of restrictionist House northerners to acquiesce in supporting Missouri as a slave state.<ref>Brown, 1966. p. 25: "[Henry Clay], who managed to bring up the separate parts of the compromise separately in the House, enabling the Old Republicans [in the South] to provide him with a margin of victory on the closely contested Missouri [statehood] bill while saved their pride by voting against the Thomas Proviso."</ref><ref>Wilentz, 2004. p. 381</ref> While the Missouri question in the 15th Congress ended in stalemate on March 4, 1819, with the House sustaining its northern antislavery position and the Senate blocking a state that restricted slavery, it succeeded in the 16th Congress.


The Missouri Compromise was very controversial, and many worried that the country had become lawfully divided along sectarian lines. The [[Kansas–Nebraska Act]] effectively repealed the bill in 1854, and the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in ''[[Dred Scott v. Sandford]]'' (1857), both of which increased tensions over slavery and contributed to the [[American Civil War]]. The compromise both delayed the Civil War and sowed its seeds; [[Thomas Jefferson]] writing contemporaneously predicted the line it had drawn would someday tear the Union apart. 40 years later, the [[Union (American Civil War)|North]] and [[Confederate States of America|South]] would split closely along the 36°30′ parallel and fight for four bloody years.
The Missouri Compromise was very controversial, and many worried that the country had become lawfully divided along sectarian lines. The [[Kansas Nebraska Act]] effectively repealed the bill in 1854, and the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in ''[[Dred Scott v. Sandford]]'' (1857), both of which increased tensions over slavery and contributed to the [[American Civil War]]. The compromise both delayed the Civil War and sowed its seeds; [[Thomas Jefferson]] writing contemporaneously predicted the line it had drawn would someday tear the Union apart. 40 years later, the [[Union (American Civil War)|North]] and [[Confederate States of America|South]] would split closely along the 36°30′ parallel and fight for four bloody years.


== Provenance ==
== Provenance ==

Latest revision as of 08:20, 11 September 2023

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

The Missouri Compromise was a U.S. law, passed in 1820 and in effect until 1854 (when the Kansas Nebraska Act overrode it), that balanced desires of northern states to prevent expansion of slavery in the U.S. with those of southern states to expand slavery. It admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state and declared a policy of prohibiting slavery in the remaining Louisiana Purchase lands north of the 36°30′ parallel.[1] The 16th United States Congress passed the legislation on March 3, 1820, and President James Monroe signed it on March 6, 1820.[2]

Earlier, in February 1819, Representative James Tallmadge Jr., a Democratic-Republican (Jeffersonian Republican) from New York, had submitted two amendments to Missouri's request for statehood that included restrictions on slavery. Southerners objected to any bill that imposed federal restrictions on slavery and believed that it was a state issue, as settled by the Constitution. However, with the Senate evenly split at the opening of the debates, both sections possessing 11 states, the admission of Missouri as a slave state would give the South an advantage. Northern critics including Federalists and Democratic-Republicans objected to the expansion of slavery into the Louisiana Purchase territory on the Constitutional inequalities of the three-fifths rule, which conferred Southern representation in the federal government derived from a state's slave population.

Jeffersonian Republicans in the North ardently maintained that a strict interpretation of the Constitution required that Congress act to limit the spread of slavery on egalitarian grounds. "[Northern] Republicans rooted their antislavery arguments, not on expediency, but in egalitarian morality."[3] "The Constitution [said northern Jeffersonians], strictly interpreted, gave the sons of the founding generation the legal tools to hasten [the] removal [of slavery], including the refusal to admit additional slave states."[4]

When free-soil Maine offered its petition for statehood, the Senate quickly linked the Maine and Missouri bills, making Maine admission a condition for Missouri entering the Union as a slave state. Senator Jesse B. Thomas of Illinois added a compromise proviso that excluded slavery from all remaining lands of the Louisiana Purchase north of the 36° 30' parallel. The combined measures passed the Senate, only to be voted down in the House by Northern representatives who held out for a free Missouri. Speaker of the House Henry Clay of Kentucky, in a desperate bid to break the deadlock, divided the Senate bills. Clay and his pro-compromise allies succeeded in pressuring half of the anti-restrictionist House Southerners to submit to the passage of the Thomas proviso and maneuvered a number of restrictionist House northerners to acquiesce in supporting Missouri as a slave state.[5][6] While the Missouri question in the 15th Congress ended in stalemate on March 4, 1819, with the House sustaining its northern antislavery position and the Senate blocking a state that restricted slavery, it succeeded in the 16th Congress.

The Missouri Compromise was very controversial, and many worried that the country had become lawfully divided along sectarian lines. The Kansas Nebraska Act effectively repealed the bill in 1854, and the Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional in Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), both of which increased tensions over slavery and contributed to the American Civil War. The compromise both delayed the Civil War and sowed its seeds; Thomas Jefferson writing contemporaneously predicted the line it had drawn would someday tear the Union apart. 40 years later, the North and South would split closely along the 36°30′ parallel and fight for four bloody years.

Provenance

Some content on this page may previously have appeared on Wikipedia.

Notes

  1. Hammond, John Craig (March 2019). "President, Planter, Politician: James Monroe, the Missouri Crisis, and the Politics of Slavery". Journal of American History 105 (4): 843–867. DOI:10.1093/jahist/jaz002. Research Blogging.
  2. Hammond, 2019
    Dangerfield, 1966. p. 125
    Wilentz, 2004. p. 382
  3. Wilentz 2004. p. 387
  4. Wilentz 2004 p. 389
  5. Brown, 1966. p. 25: "[Henry Clay], who managed to bring up the separate parts of the compromise separately in the House, enabling the Old Republicans [in the South] to provide him with a margin of victory on the closely contested Missouri [statehood] bill while saved their pride by voting against the Thomas Proviso."
  6. Wilentz, 2004. p. 381