Planned tactical nuclear attacks on Japan: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "OLYMPIC" to "Olympic")
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
  | isbn = 978-1-59114-316-1}}, pp. 201-203</ref>
  | isbn = 978-1-59114-316-1}}, pp. 201-203</ref>


This initiative came from General of the Army [[George C. Marshall]], [[Chief of Staff of the Army]]. He had recommended reassigning the cities still on the list, Niigata and Kokura, to conventional bombing. He expected 8 to 9 bombs would be available for targets on or near the invasion beaches. Each of the three initial invading [[corps]] would have three bombs allocated, "one or two, but probably one, as a preliminary, then the landing, than another one further inland against the immmediate suports, and then the third against any troops that might try to come through the mountains from up on the Inland Sea."
This initiative came from General of the Army [[George C. Marshall]], [[Chief of Staff of the Army]]. He had recommended reassigning the cities still on the list, Niigata and Kokura, to conventional bombing. He expected 8 to 9 bombs would be available for targets on or near the invasion beaches. Each of the three initial invading corps would have three bombs allocated, "one or two, but probably one, as a preliminary, then the landing, than another one further inland against the immmediate suports, and then the third against any troops that might try to come through the mountains from up on the Inland Sea."


The danger of radiation to troops, as well as to construction units building bases from earth contaminated with fallout, was not completely appreciated. It has been speculated that, had the months of delay before the planned November 1945 invasion had taken place, the U.S. might have intercepted enough [[communications intelligence]] about Japanese radiation casualties to have reconsidered sending troops through contamination, but this can only be guessed. The plan does support the idea that the U.S. had no specific idea of the radiation effects that were seen at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The danger of radiation to troops, as well as to construction units building bases from earth contaminated with fallout, was not completely appreciated. It has been speculated that, had the months of delay before the planned November 1945 invasion had taken place, the U.S. might have intercepted enough communications intelligence about Japanese radiation casualties to have reconsidered sending troops through contamination, but this can only be guessed. The plan does support the idea that the U.S. had no specific idea of the radiation effects that were seen at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.


Historian Edward Drea wrote, "...American GIs and Marines who would have landed on radioactive beaches - another hell, that of radiation poisoning, might well have been in store. In 1945 no one really grasped the implications of radioactive fallout, and the hellish effects would undoubtedly have persisted for decades after the explosions."<ref>{{citation
Historian Edward Drea wrote, "...American GIs and Marines who would have landed on radioactive beaches - another hell, that of radiation poisoning, might well have been in store. In 1945 no one really grasped the implications of radioactive fallout, and the hellish effects would undoubtedly have persisted for decades after the explosions."<ref>{{citation
Line 17: Line 17:
  | journal = MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History | date =  Spring 1995}}</ref>
  | journal = MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History | date =  Spring 1995}}</ref>
==References==
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{reflist}}[[Category:Suggestion Bot Tag]]

Latest revision as of 16:00, 4 October 2024

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.
For more information, see: Invasion of Japan.

While the actual nuclear attacks against Japan in World War Two in the Pacific were strategic bombing of military and civilian targets in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the evolving U.S. strategy was to reserve additional bombs for tactical use in Operation Olympic, the land invasion of Kyushu. [1]

This initiative came from General of the Army George C. Marshall, Chief of Staff of the Army. He had recommended reassigning the cities still on the list, Niigata and Kokura, to conventional bombing. He expected 8 to 9 bombs would be available for targets on or near the invasion beaches. Each of the three initial invading corps would have three bombs allocated, "one or two, but probably one, as a preliminary, then the landing, than another one further inland against the immmediate suports, and then the third against any troops that might try to come through the mountains from up on the Inland Sea."

The danger of radiation to troops, as well as to construction units building bases from earth contaminated with fallout, was not completely appreciated. It has been speculated that, had the months of delay before the planned November 1945 invasion had taken place, the U.S. might have intercepted enough communications intelligence about Japanese radiation casualties to have reconsidered sending troops through contamination, but this can only be guessed. The plan does support the idea that the U.S. had no specific idea of the radiation effects that were seen at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Historian Edward Drea wrote, "...American GIs and Marines who would have landed on radioactive beaches - another hell, that of radiation poisoning, might well have been in store. In 1945 no one really grasped the implications of radioactive fallout, and the hellish effects would undoubtedly have persisted for decades after the explosions."[2]

References

  1. D.M. Giangrego (2009), Hell to Pay: Operation Downfall and the Invasion of Japan, 1945-1947, United States Naval Institute Press, ISBN 978-1-59114-316-1, pp. 201-203
  2. Edward J. Drea (Spring 1995), "Previews of Hell", MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History