Template talk:Approved: Difference between revisions
imported>David Still (→Approval templates Looks useful to me: Reply.) |
imported>ZachPruckowski |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:Forum topic [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,682.msg5486.html#new here], if you're wondering. :) And yes, we can set a template to have an absolute position on the page, such as inline with an article title. [[User:David Still|David Still]] 05:23, 23 March 2007 (CDT) | :Forum topic [http://forum.citizendium.org/index.php/topic,682.msg5486.html#new here], if you're wondering. :) And yes, we can set a template to have an absolute position on the page, such as inline with an article title. [[User:David Still|David Still]] 05:23, 23 March 2007 (CDT) | ||
I feel like we should have at least the workgroup noticeable on the template, even if it just says "This is an approved Biology article". I also think this would lead to our needing to make a protected subpage to list the approval details. -- [[User:ZachPruckowski|ZachPruckowski]] ([[User_talk:ZachPruckowski|Speak to me]]) 08:52, 23 March 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 07:52, 23 March 2007
Please make this purty. --Larry Sanger 19:24, 12 December 2006 (CST)
Alternative
With the current Approved template on any given article, I'm barely able to read the entire first paragraph without having to scroll down on my 12" laptop screen. I suggest a smaller format, something like this:
This is an Approved article! |
Or:
This is an Approved article! (What does this mean?) |
Or even:
This is an Approved article! [more] |
The above template could be placed in the top-left corner of the screen, sitting just above the underline beneath the article's Header (ie, inline with the title of the article). It can be kept very simple: all that needs to be said is that the article has been approved: that's the central point that's being made. The "What does this mean?" think could then point to one of two places:
- The template page itself, as in the above example. <noinclude> and similar tags allow us to alter the template so that it appears as above when placed on an article, but when viewed directly provide a thorough explanation of Approval.
- A section at the bottom of the page, providing the same information. This possibility has the additional advantage that providing a link to the article's draft page would be trivial.
What do people think of this? My iBook would certainly appreciate the change. -- David Still 00:02, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
Approval templates Looks useful to me
What you might do is raise it on the forums. Chris Day would be interested I think. He's into that kind of stuff. Space is valuable! The middle one gets my no 1 vote David Tribe 01:24, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
I like the second or third one. Is there a way to place it to the right of the article title? --Joe Quick (Talk) 03:28, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
- Forum topic here, if you're wondering. :) And yes, we can set a template to have an absolute position on the page, such as inline with an article title. David Still 05:23, 23 March 2007 (CDT)
I feel like we should have at least the workgroup noticeable on the template, even if it just says "This is an approved Biology article". I also think this would lead to our needing to make a protected subpage to list the approval details. -- ZachPruckowski (Speak to me) 08:52, 23 March 2007 (CDT)