File talk:AnnCoulter01.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen
No edit summary
imported>Stephen Ewen
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
We need to find out whether this image actually can be used here.  The fact that it's a publicity image by itself doesn't mean it's copyright-free.  It's one thing for the press to use a press image; it's another for an online encyclopedia to use a press image. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:13, 29 March 2007 (CDT)
We need to find out whether this image actually can be used here.  The fact that it's a publicity image by itself doesn't mean it's copyright-free.  It's one thing for the press to use a press image; it's another for an online encyclopedia to use a press image. --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 10:13, 29 March 2007 (CDT)


:Coultler strictly copyrights her articles. The images at her site, however, carry no such notice. The pictures there include screenshots of herself on CNN. These are ''definitely'' implied to be for fair use.  How ''we'' take that is...to be determined.  [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 11:46, 29 March 2007 (CDT)
:Coultler strictly copyrights her articles. The images at her site, however, carry no such notice. The pictures there include screenshots of herself on CNN. The images are ''definitely'' implied to be for fair use.  How ''we'' take that is...to be determined.  [[User:Stephen Ewen|Stephen Ewen]] 11:46, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 22:47, 28 March 2007

We need to find out whether this image actually can be used here. The fact that it's a publicity image by itself doesn't mean it's copyright-free. It's one thing for the press to use a press image; it's another for an online encyclopedia to use a press image. --Larry Sanger 10:13, 29 March 2007 (CDT)

Coultler strictly copyrights her articles. The images at her site, however, carry no such notice. The pictures there include screenshots of herself on CNN. The images are definitely implied to be for fair use. How we take that is...to be determined. Stephen Ewen 11:46, 29 March 2007 (CDT)