File talk:MOS 6502.jpg: Difference between revisions
imported>Eric M Gearhart (Image copyright) |
imported>Eric M Gearhart |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
note: see [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:MOS_6502AD_4585_top.jpg here] for the image in question on Wikimedia commons, and [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Image:MOS_6502.jpg&oldid=100076002 here] for my original citation of this image.<br/> | note: see [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:MOS_6502AD_4585_top.jpg here] for the image in question on Wikimedia commons, and [http://en.citizendium.org/wiki?title=Image:MOS_6502.jpg&oldid=100076002 here] for my original citation of this image.<br/> | ||
I don't see what the problem was with the way I cited this image's copyright. I clearly stated this file was uploaded originally to Wikimedia commons, and that it was licensed under the GFDL 1.2. The person who uploaded this file explicitly stated that images uploaded to Wikimedia commons were under this license. Why would I have had to go find this image somewhere else on the web and make another statement about his licensing conditions? He released the file under the GFDL on Wikimedia. If, for example he released the image into the public domain and then elsewhere on his personal site he had a different license, he still released that other image into | I don't see what the problem was with the way I cited this image's copyright. I clearly stated this file was uploaded originally to Wikimedia commons, and that it was licensed under the GFDL 1.2. The person who uploaded this file explicitly stated that images uploaded to Wikimedia commons were under this license. Why would I have had to go find this image somewhere else on the web and make another statement about his licensing conditions? He released the file under the GFDL on Wikimedia. If, for example he released the image into the public domain and then elsewhere on his personal site he had a different license, he still released that other image into the public domain | ||
--[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 03:45, 12 April 2007 (CDT) | --[[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 03:45, 12 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:46, 12 April 2007
Image copyright
note: see here for the image in question on Wikimedia commons, and here for my original citation of this image.
I don't see what the problem was with the way I cited this image's copyright. I clearly stated this file was uploaded originally to Wikimedia commons, and that it was licensed under the GFDL 1.2. The person who uploaded this file explicitly stated that images uploaded to Wikimedia commons were under this license. Why would I have had to go find this image somewhere else on the web and make another statement about his licensing conditions? He released the file under the GFDL on Wikimedia. If, for example he released the image into the public domain and then elsewhere on his personal site he had a different license, he still released that other image into the public domain --Eric M Gearhart 03:45, 12 April 2007 (CDT)
