Talk:Natural family planning: Difference between revisions
imported>Nancy Sculerati |
imported>Nancy Sculerati |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Barron ML. Fehring RJ. Basal body temperature assessment: is it useful to couples seeking pregnancy?. [Review] [36 refs] [Journal Article. Review] MCN, American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing. 30(5):290-6; quiz 297-8, 2005 Sep-Oct. UI: 16132004 - "How Can Women Find out When They Ovulate? | Barron ML. Fehring RJ. Basal body temperature assessment: is it useful to couples seeking pregnancy?. [Review] [36 refs] [Journal Article. Review] MCN, American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing. 30(5):290-6; quiz 297-8, 2005 Sep-Oct. UI: 16132004 - "How Can Women Find out When They Ovulate? | ||
There are two methods usually used to teach women to understand when they are ovulating: prospective methods and retrospective methods. These methods are essentially different. Prospective methods rely on preovulation events and reflect the presence or absence of a developing follicle, estrogen dominance, and/or an LH surge. Examples of prospective methods include the presence of cervical mucus (which at its peak looks like egg white), use of urinary LH detection kits, or the Clearblue Fertility Monitor (a hand-held electronic device designed to detect urinary metabolites of the preovulatory estrogen rise and the LH surge) (Bigelow et al., 2004). Retrospective methods rely on postovulation events, namely the presence of a corpus luteum with progesterone dominance. The most common retrospective method of indicating ovulation is measurement of BBT. Assessment of when cervical mucus has ended can also be considered a retrospective method of ovulation (Barron & Daly, 2001)....The most accurate method of estimating the day of ovulation is performed by a healthcare professional: serial ultrasound of the developing follicles and detection of the day of ovulation (US-DO) by visualizing the day of follicular collapse and fluid in the cul-de-sac (Ecochard, Boehringer, Rabilloud, & Marret, 2001)...Over the last 30 years the vast majority of researchers have concluded that BBT is not a reliable marker of ovulation. Interrater reliability in interpretation of temperature curves ranges from 25% to 50% depending on the day of the cycle being studied (Guermandi et al., 2001). There are many reasons for this, including the technique of the patient, confounding factors such as alcohol intake or timing of temperature taking, or the woman’s physiologic hormonal milieu....Rather than suggest BBT, APNs might consider recommending a low-technology method such as cervical mucus charting (Bigelow et al., 2004). For more accuracy but also more expense, use of the Clearblue Fertility Monitor can be recommended to identify the fertile window to appropriately time intercourse." | There are two methods usually used to teach women to understand when they are ovulating: prospective methods and retrospective methods. These methods are essentially different. Prospective methods rely on preovulation events and reflect the presence or absence of a developing follicle, estrogen dominance, and/or an LH surge. Examples of prospective methods include the presence of cervical mucus (which at its peak looks like egg white), use of urinary LH detection kits, or the Clearblue Fertility Monitor (a hand-held electronic device designed to detect urinary metabolites of the preovulatory estrogen rise and the LH surge) (Bigelow et al., 2004). Retrospective methods rely on postovulation events, namely the presence of a corpus luteum with progesterone dominance. The most common retrospective method of indicating ovulation is measurement of BBT. Assessment of when cervical mucus has ended can also be considered a retrospective method of ovulation (Barron & Daly, 2001)....The most accurate method of estimating the day of ovulation is performed by a healthcare professional: serial ultrasound of the developing follicles and detection of the day of ovulation (US-DO) by visualizing the day of follicular collapse and fluid in the cul-de-sac (Ecochard, Boehringer, Rabilloud, & Marret, 2001)...Over the last 30 years the vast majority of researchers have concluded that BBT is not a reliable marker of ovulation. Interrater reliability in interpretation of temperature curves ranges from 25% to 50% depending on the day of the cycle being studied (Guermandi et al., 2001). There are many reasons for this, including the technique of the patient, confounding factors such as alcohol intake or timing of temperature taking, or the woman’s physiologic hormonal milieu....Rather than suggest BBT, APNs might consider recommending a low-technology method such as cervical mucus charting (Bigelow et al., 2004). For more accuracy but also more expense, use of the Clearblue Fertility Monitor can be recommended to identify the fertile window to appropriately time intercourse." | ||
Historical interest: | |||
Lauritzen Ch. [Knaus' method. The calculation of female fertile and sterile days]. [German] [Biography. Historical Article. Journal Article] MMW - Munchener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 120(14):487-8, 1978 Apr 7. | |||
UI: 347274 | |||
== Primer == | == Primer == | ||
Revision as of 00:38, 11 May 2007
References
Stanford JB. Lemaire JC. Thurman PB. Women's interest in natural family planning. [Journal Article] Journal of Family Practice. 46(1):65-71, 1998 Jan. UI: 9451372
Visness CM. Kennedy KI. The frequency of coitus during breastfeeding. [Journal Article. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.] Birth. 24(4):253-7, 1997 Dec. UI: 9460317
Kambic RT. Lamprecht V. Calendar rhythm efficacy: a review. [Journal Article. Meta-Analysis. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.] Advances in Contraception. 12(2):123-8, 1996 Jun. UI: 8863907
Hilgers TW. Pregnancy and the timing of intercourse.[comment]. [Comment. Letter] New England Journal of Medicine. 334(19):1267; author reply 1267-8, 1996 May 9. UI: 8606727
Girard M. Natural family planning.[comment]. [Comment. Letter] Lancet. 346(8977):775; author reply 775-6, 1995 Sep 16. UI: 7658892
Barron ML. Fehring RJ. Basal body temperature assessment: is it useful to couples seeking pregnancy?. [Review] [36 refs] [Journal Article. Review] MCN, American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing. 30(5):290-6; quiz 297-8, 2005 Sep-Oct. UI: 16132004 - "How Can Women Find out When They Ovulate? There are two methods usually used to teach women to understand when they are ovulating: prospective methods and retrospective methods. These methods are essentially different. Prospective methods rely on preovulation events and reflect the presence or absence of a developing follicle, estrogen dominance, and/or an LH surge. Examples of prospective methods include the presence of cervical mucus (which at its peak looks like egg white), use of urinary LH detection kits, or the Clearblue Fertility Monitor (a hand-held electronic device designed to detect urinary metabolites of the preovulatory estrogen rise and the LH surge) (Bigelow et al., 2004). Retrospective methods rely on postovulation events, namely the presence of a corpus luteum with progesterone dominance. The most common retrospective method of indicating ovulation is measurement of BBT. Assessment of when cervical mucus has ended can also be considered a retrospective method of ovulation (Barron & Daly, 2001)....The most accurate method of estimating the day of ovulation is performed by a healthcare professional: serial ultrasound of the developing follicles and detection of the day of ovulation (US-DO) by visualizing the day of follicular collapse and fluid in the cul-de-sac (Ecochard, Boehringer, Rabilloud, & Marret, 2001)...Over the last 30 years the vast majority of researchers have concluded that BBT is not a reliable marker of ovulation. Interrater reliability in interpretation of temperature curves ranges from 25% to 50% depending on the day of the cycle being studied (Guermandi et al., 2001). There are many reasons for this, including the technique of the patient, confounding factors such as alcohol intake or timing of temperature taking, or the woman’s physiologic hormonal milieu....Rather than suggest BBT, APNs might consider recommending a low-technology method such as cervical mucus charting (Bigelow et al., 2004). For more accuracy but also more expense, use of the Clearblue Fertility Monitor can be recommended to identify the fertile window to appropriately time intercourse."
Historical interest: Lauritzen Ch. [Knaus' method. The calculation of female fertile and sterile days]. [German] [Biography. Historical Article. Journal Article] MMW - Munchener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 120(14):487-8, 1978 Apr 7. UI: 347274
Primer
Years ago I co-authored this Primer on natural family planning: [1]. It could be a source of information and links. (Not sure about copyright.) --Catherine Woodgold 13:11, 5 May 2007 (CDT)
Possible ways to structure the article
Possible ways to structure the article include:
- Following the history of NPF (Natural Family Planning)
- In order of the stages of a woman's life
- In order of the phases of the menstrual cycle (but these two woman-focussed structures could put too little emphasis on men's role)
- From most effective to least effective, or vice versa (there are problems with either structure)
- Divided up by purpose: avoiding pregancy, achieving pregnancy, health issues, religious issues etc.
- Other?
Perhaps of the above I prefer in order of the phases of the menstrual cycle, i.e. discussing calendar rhythm first, then mucus-only methods, then temperature methods, and miscellaneous other stuff afterwards, e.g. while breastfeeding, after coming off the pill, etc. But I'm open to other ideas about how to structure it. --Catherine Woodgold 09:29, 6 May 2007 (CDT)
Catherine -you are willing to actually work on the article by writing it, as an author. Nancy Sculerati 21:06, 6 May 2007 (CDT)